Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | CLBT | 18.6% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4% |
| Value | CLBT | PEG 0.62 vs 1.74 |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs CLBT's 16.5% |
| Stability / Safety | CLBT | Beta 0.83 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AAPL | 0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; CLBT pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AAPL | +9.7% vs CLBT's -28.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs CLBT's 8.3%, ROIC 64.5% vs 18.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Cellebrite provides digital intelligence solutions for legally sanctioned investigations by law enforcement and government agencies. It generates revenue primarily from software licenses and maintenance fees for its forensic data extraction and analysis platforms — including its Universal Forensic Extraction Device and DI platform — which help investigators access and analyze digital evidence from locked, encrypted, or deleted sources. The company's key advantage is its deep technical expertise in overcoming device security barriers and its established relationships with government agencies worldwide, creating high switching costs in a specialized, regulated market.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AAPL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLBT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 915.8x CLBT's $476M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLBT's 16.5%.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $476M | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $78M | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $78M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $160M | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.2% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.1% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 35.4x trailing earnings, AAPL trades at a 18% valuation discount to CLBT's 43.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CLBT offers better value at 0.73x vs AAPL's 1.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.03x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 36.25x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.33x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.86x | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.88x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.34x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $16 for CLBT. CLBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.3% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,549 for CLBT. Over the past 12 months, AAPL leads with a +9.7% total return vs CLBT's -28.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLBT at 29.4% vs AAPL's 21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.2% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.1% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.9% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.5% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.1% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.4% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs CLBT's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.86 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.76 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.0% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.9 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CLBT as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.9% upside for CLBT (target: $21) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.67 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 100 | 154.24 | +54.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 220.02 | +120.0% |
Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT)'s +25%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | $172M | $476M | +176.8% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -1.1% | 16.5% | +1608.5% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 340.8 | 58.2 | -82.9% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Cellebrite DI Ltd. has traded in a 7x–341x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -0.01 | 0.31 | +3200.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Cellebrite DI Ltd. generated $160M FCF in 2025 (+474% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
CLBT vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLBT or AAPL a better buy right now?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) offers the better valuation at 35.4x trailing P/E (31.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLBT or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the cheapest at 35.4x versus Cellebrite DI Ltd. at 43.0x. On forward P/E, Apple Inc. is actually cheaper at 31.1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cellebrite DI Ltd. wins at 0.62x versus Apple Inc.'s 1.74x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLBT or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to +25.5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus CLBT's +38.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLBT or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 55% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — CLBT or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 16.5% for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 14.0% for CLBT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CLBT or AAPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.62x versus Apple Inc.'s 1.74x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Apple Inc. (AAPL) trades at 31.1x forward P/E versus 36.3x for Cellebrite DI Ltd. — 5.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLBT: 54.9% to $20.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — CLBT or AAPL?
In this comparison, AAPL (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. CLBT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CLBT or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28), +1027% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1027%, CLBT: +38.1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CLBT and AAPL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.