Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) vs Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EXE | 187.2% revenue growth vs CRK's -19.9% |
| Value | EXE | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 22.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | CRK | 17.8% net margin vs EXE's 15.0% |
| Stability / Safety | EXE | Beta 0.49 vs CRK's 1.04 |
| Dividends | EXE | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; CRK pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | EXE | +11.8% vs CRK's +9.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EXE | 6.4% ROA vs CRK's 5.6%, ROIC 7.4% vs -2.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Comstock Resources is an independent energy company focused on natural gas exploration and production in the Haynesville Shale region of North Louisiana and East Texas. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales — which account for over 90% of production — with the remainder from oil and natural gas liquids. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost position within the prolific Haynesville Shale, one of North America's most productive natural gas basins.
Expand Energy Corporation is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on unconventional natural gas resources in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales — with additional contributions from oil and natural gas liquids — through its extensive portfolio of approximately 5,000 wells across key shale plays like the Marcellus and Haynesville formations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-scale, low-cost position in premier natural gas basins and its operational expertise in unconventional resource development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
CRK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). EXE leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EXE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 5.5x CRK's $2.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 17.8% (CRK) to 15.0% (EXE). On growth, CRK holds the edge at +115.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.3B | $5.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $396M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$84M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.5% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.5% | +63.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.1% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EXE's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRK's 14.0x.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.7B | $25.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.80x | 14.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.97x | 12.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.96x | 5.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.57x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.41x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRK delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXE scores 8/9 vs CRK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.4% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$616M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $616M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.87x | 9.91x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CRK five years ago would be worth $33,951 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,500 for EXE. Over the past 12 months, EXE leads with a +11.8% total return vs CRK's +9.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRK at 18.3% vs EXE's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.1% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.7% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.5% | +185.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +399.6% | +197.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRK's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXE currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs CRK's 62.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.17 | $126.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.65 | $91.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.9% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CRK as "Hold" and EXE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for EXE (target: $138) vs -5.7% for CRK (target: $19). EXE is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | CRKComstock Resource… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.50 | $137.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 39 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3182.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | 100 | 369.63 | +269.6% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 104.37 | 249.86 | +139.4% |
Comstock Resources,… (CRK) returned +240% over 5 years vs Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE)'s +185%. A $10,000 investment in CRK 5 years ago would be worth $33,951 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | $176M | $1.3B | +613.5% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | $7.9B | $12.1B | +54.0% |
Expand Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $7.9B (2016) to $12.1B (2025) — a 4.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | -76.9% | -17.5% | +77.3% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -55.8% | 15.0% | +126.9% |
Expand Energy Corporation's net margin went from -56% (2016) to 15% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | 15.8 | 11.6 | -26.6% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 1.2 | 14.6 | +1116.7% |
Comstock Resources, Inc. has traded in a 3x–16x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-26x. Expand Energy Corporation has traded in a 1x–15x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comstock Resources,… (CRK) | -11.52 | -0.76 | +93.4% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -1,278 | 7.57 | +100.6% |
Expand Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $-1278.00 (2016) to $7.57 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Comstock Resources, Inc. generated $-477M FCF in 2024 (-381% vs 2021). Expand Energy Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+75% vs 2021).
CRK vs EXE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRK or EXE a better buy right now?
Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) offers the better valuation at 14.3x trailing P/E (12.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRK or EXE?
On forward P/E, Expand Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 12.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRK or EXE?
Over the past 5 years, Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK) delivered a total return of +239.5%, compared to +185.0% for Expand Energy Corporation (EXE). A $10,000 investment in CRK five years ago would be worth approximately $34K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRK returned +399.6% versus EXE's +197.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRK or EXE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus Comstock Resources, Inc.'s 1.04β — meaning CRK is approximately 111% more volatile than EXE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — CRK or EXE?
Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the more profitable company, earning 15.0% net margin versus -17.5% for Comstock Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXE leads at 16.8% versus -13.5% for CRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXE leads at 80.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CRK or EXE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) trades at 12.0x forward P/E versus 22.0x for Comstock Resources, Inc. — 9.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXE: 27.7% to $137.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — CRK or EXE?
In this comparison, EXE (100.0% yield) pays a dividend. CRK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CRK or EXE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 100.0% yield, +197.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXE: +197.4%, CRK: +399.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CRK and EXE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: CRK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXE is a mid-cap deep-value stock. EXE pays a dividend while CRK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.