Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare DLocal Limited (DLO) vs Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAFRM38.8% revenue growth vs DLO's 14.7%
ValueDLOLower P/E (14.0x vs 43.6x)
Quality / MarginsDLO17.8% net margin vs AFRM's 9.7%
Stability / SafetyDLOBeta 1.29 vs AFRM's 2.41, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DLO+33.5% vs AFRM's -26.8%
Efficiency (ROA)DLO12.1% ROA vs AFRM's 2.2%, ROIC 59.4% vs -0.7%
Bottom line: DLO leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Affirm Holdings, Inc. is the better choice for growth and revenue expansion. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

DLODLocal Limited
Technology

DLocal operates a cross-border payments platform that enables global merchants to accept payments and make payouts in emerging markets. It generates revenue primarily from transaction fees — taking a percentage of each payment processed through its platform — with additional income from foreign exchange spreads and other financial services. The company's key advantage is its deep local infrastructure in high-growth emerging markets, allowing it to navigate complex regulatory environments and payment methods that global competitors struggle to penetrate.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
Technology

Affirm operates a buy-now-pay-later platform that enables consumers to split purchases into installment payments at online and physical retailers. It generates revenue primarily from merchant fees — typically 3-6% of transaction value — and interest income from longer-term loans to consumers. Its key advantage is a transparent, fee-free model that builds consumer trust and a growing merchant network that creates a two-sided marketplace effect.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DLODLocal Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

DLO 4AFRM 1
Financial MetricsDLO4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsDLO4/5 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyDLO8/9 metrics
Total ReturnsAFRM4/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityDLO2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

DLO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). AFRM leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

AFRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 3.0x DLO's $960M. DLO is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFRM's 9.7%. On growth, DLO holds the edge at +52.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$960M$2.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$223M$420M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$171M$282M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$152M$619M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.6%+59.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+20.8%+7.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.8%+9.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.8%+21.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+52.1%-62.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.1%+60.9%
DLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 31.4x trailing earnings, DLO trades at a 90% valuation discount to AFRM's 313.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DLO's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 158.0x.

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Market CapShares × price$2.0B$15.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.7B$21.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS31.38x313.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.96x43.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.50x158.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.72x4.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.64x5.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.38x
DLO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DLO delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $8 for AFRM. DLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AFRM scores 6/9 vs DLO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+33.9%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+12.1%+2.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+59.4%-0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.5%-0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x2.56x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$371M$6.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$425M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$54M$7.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.06x1.49x
DLO leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $5,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,941 for DLO. Over the past 12 months, DLO leads with a +33.5% total return vs AFRM's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFRM at 51.1% vs DLO's -5.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.0%-36.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.5%-26.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.6%+244.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%-48.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%-51.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.1%+51.1%
AFRM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

DLO is the less volatile stock with a 1.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DLO currently trades 72.9% from its 52-week high vs AFRM's 47.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x2.41x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.78$100.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.61$30.90
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+72.9%+47.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.434.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M5.3M
DLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates DLO as "Buy" and AFRM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.7% upside for AFRM (target: $84) vs 38.9% for DLO (target: $17).

MetricDLODLocal LimitedAFRMAffirm Holdings, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$84.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts1332
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.0%+1.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockJun 21Feb 26Change
DLocal Limited (DLO)10042.67-57.3%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10090.67-9.3%

Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) returned -49% over 5 years vs DLocal Limited (DLO)'s -61%.

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20192025Change
DLocal Limited (DLO)$55M$746M+1249.2%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)$264M$3.2B+1119.7%

Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $264M (2019) to $3.2B (2025) — a 51.7% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20192025Change
DLocal Limited (DLO)28.2%16.1%-42.8%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)-45.6%1.6%+103.6%

Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from -46% (2019) to 2% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years

Stock20212024Change
DLocal Limited (DLO)137.328.9-79.0%

DLocal Limited has traded in a 29x–137x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~31x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20192025Change
DLocal Limited (DLO)0.050.39+631.7%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)-0.470.15+131.9%

Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.47 (2019) to $0.15 (2025).

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$60M
$-213M
2022
$167M
$-274M
2023
$275M
$-109M
2024
$-55M
$291M
2025
$602M
DLocal Limited (DLO)Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)

DLocal Limited generated $-55M FCF in 2024 (-192% vs 2021). Affirm Holdings, Inc. generated $602M FCF in 2025 (+382% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

DLO vs AFRM: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DLO or AFRM a better buy right now?

DLocal Limited (DLO) offers the better valuation at 31.4x trailing P/E (14.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DLocal Limited (DLO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DLO or AFRM?

On trailing P/E, DLocal Limited (DLO) is the cheapest at 31.4x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 313.2x. On forward P/E, DLocal Limited is actually cheaper at 14.0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DLO or AFRM?

Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) delivered a total return of -48.6%, compared to -60.6% for DLocal Limited (DLO). A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth approximately $5K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AFRM returned -51.7% versus DLO's -60.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DLO or AFRM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DLocal Limited (DLO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.29β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc.'s 2.41β — meaning AFRM is approximately 87% more volatile than DLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DLocal Limited (DLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — DLO or AFRM?

DLocal Limited (DLO) is the more profitable company, earning 16.1% net margin versus 1.6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DLO leads at 18.8% versus -2.7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AFRM leads at 67.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is DLO or AFRM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, DLocal Limited (DLO) trades at 14.0x forward P/E versus 43.6x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 29.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AFRM: 79.7% to $84.40.

07

Which pays a better dividend — DLO or AFRM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is DLO or AFRM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, DLocal Limited (DLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.29)). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2.41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DLO: -60.6%, AFRM: -51.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between DLO and AFRM?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📈
Stocks Like

DLO

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
📊
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat DLO and AFRM on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(DLO: 52.1% · AFRM: -62.1%)
Net Margin>
%
(DLO: 17.8% · AFRM: 9.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(DLO: 31.4x · AFRM: 313.2x)