Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) vs GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) vs Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GEV | 8.9% revenue growth vs ELLO's -17.1% |
| Value | CEG | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | GEV | 12.8% net margin vs ELLO's 2.6% |
| Stability / Safety | ELLO | Beta 0.47 vs CEG's 1.70 |
| Dividends | CEG | 0.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs GEV's 0.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | GEV | +161.0% vs CEG's +32.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GEV | 7.8% ROA vs ELLO's 0.1%, ROIC 27.9% vs 1.2% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Ellomay Capital is a renewable energy developer and operator focused on solar photovoltaic plants, hydroelectric storage, and anaerobic digestion facilities across Israel, Spain, and the Netherlands. It generates revenue primarily through electricity sales from its operational power plants—including solar farms, a dual-fuel power plant, and developing pumped storage hydro—with additional income from project development and green gas production. The company's competitive advantage lies in its diversified renewable energy portfolio across multiple geographies and technologies, providing resilience against regional regulatory changes and weather-dependent generation risks.
GE Vernova is a diversified energy technology company that provides power generation equipment and grid solutions across multiple energy sources. It makes money primarily through three segments: Power (gas, nuclear, and hydro turbines), Wind (onshore and offshore wind turbines), and Electrification (grid equipment and power conversion systems). The company's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive energy portfolio—spanning traditional and renewable technologies—and its deep expertise in large-scale power infrastructure projects.
Constellation Energy is a major clean energy company that generates and sells electricity—primarily from nuclear, wind, and solar assets—across multiple U.S. power regions. It makes money by selling electricity and natural gas to utilities, municipalities, and commercial/industrial customers, with its nuclear fleet providing stable baseload power. The company's key advantage is its massive, low-carbon generation portfolio—including the nation's largest nuclear fleet—which gives it scale and operational efficiency in the transition to clean energy.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 3 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GEV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CEG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $38.1B annually — 867.3x ELLO's $44M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 12.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ELLO's 2.6%. On growth, ELLO holds the edge at +22.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $38.1B | $25.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $2.3B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $4.9B | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $3.7B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +19.9% | +75.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +3.7% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +12.8% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +9.7% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.4% | +3.8% | +1.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +85.1% | +6.7% | -49.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 44.6x trailing earnings, CEG trades at a 10% valuation discount to GEV's 49.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CEG's 26.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 101.1x.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $332M | $235.5B | $103.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $898M | $226.6B | $108.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.05x | 49.38x | 44.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 61.04x | 28.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.43x | 101.12x | 26.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.95x | 6.19x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 19.61x | 6.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.45x | 80.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $1 for ELLO. CEG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.61x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ELLO's 4.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CEG scores 7/9 vs ELLO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.6% | +39.7% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | +7.8% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +27.9% | +11.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +6.6% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.03x | — | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $480M | -$8.8B | $5.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $8.8B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $521M | $0 | $9.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | — | 6.04x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in CEG five years ago would be worth $79,651 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,801 for ELLO. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +161.0% total return vs CEG's +32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 88.2% vs ELLO's 24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.9% | +28.6% | -9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.1% | +161.0% | +32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.7% | +566.7% | +345.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.0% | +566.7% | +696.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +203.9% | +566.7% | +696.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.4% | +88.2% | +64.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ELLO is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CEG's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ELLO's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.59x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.34 | $894.93 | $412.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.00 | $252.25 | $161.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.4% | +97.6% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.9 | 73.4 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3K | 2.5M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", CEG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.1% upside for CEG (target: $416) vs -4.5% for GEV (target: $835). For income investors, CEG offers the higher dividend yield at 0.47% vs GEV's 0.11%.
| Metric | ELLOEllomay Capital L… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | CEGConstellation Ene… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $834.72 | $415.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | 100 | 161.91 | +61.9% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 108.21 | 575.22 | +431.6% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 100 | 145.65 | +45.7% |
Constellation Energ… (CEG) returned +697% over 5 years vs Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO)'s -22%. A $10,000 investment in CEG 5 years ago would be worth $79,651 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | $12M | $40M | +230.6% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | $29.7B | $38.1B | +28.4% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | $17.8B | $25.5B | +43.8% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | -4.7% | -16.1% | -243.0% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -9.2% | 12.8% | +239.1% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 2.7% | 9.1% | +233.9% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | 78.2 | 87.9 | +12.4% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 23.3 | 47.7 | +104.7% |
Ellomay Capital Ltd. has traded in a 17x–88x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-40x. Constellation Energy Corporation has traded in a 19x–48x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~45x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) | -0.06 | -0.51 | -793.2% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -10.06 | 17.69 | +275.8% |
| Constellation Energ… (CEG) | 1.48 | 7.4 | +400.0% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Ellomay Capital Ltd. generated $-67M FCF in 2024 (+0% vs 2021). GE Vernova Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+692% vs 2022).
ELLO vs GEV vs CEG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ELLO or GEV or CEG a better buy right now?
Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) offers the better valuation at 44.6x trailing P/E (28.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ELLO or GEV or CEG?
On trailing P/E, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) is the cheapest at 44.6x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 49.4x. On forward P/E, Constellation Energy Corporation is actually cheaper at 28.1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ELLO or GEV or CEG?
Over the past 5 years, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) delivered a total return of +696.5%, compared to -22.0% for Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO). A $10,000 investment in CEG five years ago would be worth approximately $80K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CEG returned +696.5% versus ELLO's +203.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ELLO or GEV or CEG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.47β versus Constellation Energy Corporation's 1.70β — meaning CEG is approximately 261% more volatile than ELLO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 61% versus 4% for Ellomay Capital Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — ELLO or GEV or CEG?
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12.8% net margin versus -16.1% for Ellomay Capital Ltd. — meaning it keeps 12.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ELLO leads at 22.4% versus 3.6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CEG leads at 75.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ELLO or GEV or CEG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) trades at 28.1x forward P/E versus 61.0x for GE Vernova Inc. — 32.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CEG: 26.1% to $415.83.
07Which pays a better dividend — ELLO or GEV or CEG?
In this comparison, CEG (0.5% yield), GEV (0.1% yield) pay a dividend. ELLO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ELLO or GEV or CEG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ellomay Capital Ltd. (ELLO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.47), +203.9% 10Y return). Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG) carries a higher beta of 1.70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ELLO: +203.9%, CEG: +696.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ELLO and GEV and CEG?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.