Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | VRTX | 8.9% revenue growth vs FBIO's -31.8% |
| Value | VRTX | Lower P/E (25.7x vs 342.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | VRTX | 31.3% net margin vs FBIO's 6.4% |
| Stability / Safety | VRTX | Beta 0.44 vs FBIO's 0.65 |
| Dividends | FBIO | 1.0% yield; VRTX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FBIO | +117.8% vs VRTX's +3.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | VRTX | 14.8% ROA vs FBIO's 2.2%, ROIC 22.8% vs -6.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Fortress Biotech is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes pharmaceutical products across multiple therapeutic areas. It generates revenue primarily through sales of its marketed dermatology products — including treatments for acne and skin conditions — supplemented by milestone payments and potential future royalties from its extensive pipeline of late-stage and early-stage drug candidates. The company's key advantage lies in its diversified portfolio approach, which spreads risk across multiple development programs while leveraging partnerships to fund research and development.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals is a biotechnology company focused on developing and commercializing transformative medicines for serious diseases, with its flagship franchise targeting cystic fibrosis. It generates nearly all its revenue from CF therapies — primarily Trikafta/Kaftrio — while building a pipeline in pain, kidney disease, and type 1 diabetes. Its moat stems from deep scientific expertise in CFTR biology and a dominant, near-monopoly position in the CF treatment market.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
VRTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
VRTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 188.2x FBIO's $62M. VRTX is the more profitable business, keeping 31.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIO's 6.4%. On growth, FBIO holds the edge at +20.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $11.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$88M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $3.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | $3.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.8% | +86.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.2% | +34.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +31.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.5% | +4.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $95M | $126.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $124.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.27x | 32.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 342.00x | 25.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.91x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 10.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VRTX delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $6 for FBIO. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VRTX scores 5/9 vs FBIO's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +21.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +22.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -142.0% | +23.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.25x | 348.55x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth $23,616 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $588 for FBIO. Over the past 12 months, FBIO leads with a +117.8% total return vs VRTX's +3.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRTX at 19.6% vs FBIO's -33.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.1% | +9.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +117.8% | +3.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.4% | +71.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.1% | +136.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.0% | +481.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | +19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
VRTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIO's 0.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRTX currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs FBIO's 75.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.53 | $519.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.33 | $362.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.9 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 729K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIO as "Buy" and VRTX as "Buy". FBIO is the only dividend payer here at 0.98% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FBIOFortress Biotech,… | VRTXVertex Pharmaceut… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $545.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | 100 | 10.24 | -89.8% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 100 | 203.2 | +103.2% |
Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) returned +136% over 5 years vs Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO)'s -94%. A $10,000 investment in VRTX 5 years ago would be worth $23,616 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | $16M | $58M | +250.0% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | $1.7B | $12.0B | +605.1% |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's revenue grew from $1.7B (2016) to $12.0B (2025) — a 24.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | -3.3% | -79.8% | -2285.5% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | -6.6% | 32.9% | +600.4% |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's net margin went from -7% (2016) to 33% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | 144.1 | 29.6 | -79.5% |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated has traded in a 21x–144x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~32x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | -20.68 | -2.69 | +87.0% |
| Vertex Pharmaceutic… (VRTX) | -0.46 | 15.32 | +3430.4% |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated's EPS grew from $-0.46 (2016) to $15.32 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Fortress Biotech, Inc. generated $-95M FCF in 2024 (+28% vs 2021). Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+33% vs 2021).
FBIO vs VRTX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIO or VRTX a better buy right now?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) offers the better valuation at 32.4x trailing P/E (25.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIO or VRTX?
On forward P/E, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated is actually cheaper at 25.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIO or VRTX?
Over the past 5 years, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) delivered a total return of +136.2%, compared to -94.1% for Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO). A $10,000 investment in VRTX five years ago would be worth approximately $24K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VRTX returned +481.2% versus FBIO's -92.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIO or VRTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.44β versus Fortress Biotech, Inc.'s 0.65β — meaning FBIO is approximately 47% more volatile than VRTX relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — FBIO or VRTX?
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the more profitable company, earning 32.9% net margin versus -79.8% for Fortress Biotech, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VRTX leads at 39.1% versus -191.4% for FBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VRTX leads at 86.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FBIO or VRTX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) trades at 25.7x forward P/E versus 342.0x for Fortress Biotech, Inc. — 316.3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — FBIO or VRTX?
In this comparison, FBIO (1.0% yield) pays a dividend. VRTX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FBIO or VRTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.44), +481.2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VRTX: +481.2%, FBIO: -92.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FBIO and VRTX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. FBIO pays a dividend while VRTX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.