Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Genmab A/S (GMAB) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGMAB30.7% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
ValueGMABLower P/E (23.2x vs 31.1x), PEG 0.80 vs 1.74
Quality / MarginsGMAB46.8% net margin vs AAPL's 27.0%
Stability / SafetyGMABBeta 0.61 vs AAPL's 1.28, lower leverage
DividendsAAPL0.4% yield; 14-year raise streak; GMAB pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GMAB+29.8% vs AAPL's +9.7%
Efficiency (ROA)GMAB93.6% ROA vs AAPL's 31.1%, ROIC 22.2% vs 64.5%
Bottom line: GMAB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Apple Inc. is the better choice for dividend income and shareholder returns. They serve different portfolio roles — they are not true substitutes.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Valuation efficiency (growth/$)

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

GMABGenmab A/S
Healthcare

Genmab is a biotechnology company that develops and commercializes antibody-based therapies for cancer and other serious diseases. It generates revenue primarily through product sales of its marketed antibodies like DARZALEX and teprotumumab, plus significant royalties and milestone payments from partnerships with pharmaceutical companies like Johnson & Johnson. The company's key advantage is its proprietary antibody technology platforms — particularly its DuoBody bispecific antibody platform — which enable it to create differentiated therapies with improved efficacy and safety profiles.

AAPLApple Inc.
Technology

Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

GMABGenmab A/S

Segment breakdown not available.

AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

GMAB 1AAPL 1
Financial MetricsTie3/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsGMAB7/7 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyTie4/8 metrics
Total ReturnsAAPL5/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTie1/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

GMAB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AAPL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 31.0x GMAB's $14.0B. GMAB is the more profitable business, keeping 46.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AAPL's 27.0%. On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$14.0B$435.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.3B$152.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$6.6B$117.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.9B$123.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.3%+47.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.2%+32.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+46.8%+27.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.7%+28.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-81.6%+15.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-66.7%+18.3%
Evenly matched — GMAB and AAPL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 15.4x trailing earnings, GMAB trades at a 57% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GMAB offers better value at 0.53x vs AAPL's 1.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
Market CapShares × price$18.1B$3.88T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.7B$3.97T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.36x35.41x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.15x31.15x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.53x1.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.90x27.45x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.34x9.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.28x53.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.15x39.33x
GMAB leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $114 for GMAB. GMAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs GMAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+114.2%+133.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+93.6%+31.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+22.2%+64.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.3%+69.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x1.67x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8.8B$89.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9.9B$33.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$123.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense48.21x
Evenly matched — GMAB and AAPL each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $21,049 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,383 for GMAB. Over the past 12 months, GMAB leads with a +29.8% total return vs AAPL's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 21.9% vs GMAB's -7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.5%-2.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.8%+9.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-21.6%+81.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.2%+110.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+138.4%+1027.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.8%+21.9%
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GMAB is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AAPL's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 91.5% from its 52-week high vs GMAB's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.61x1.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$35.43$288.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.24$169.21
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.1%+91.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.357.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M40.9M
Evenly matched — GMAB and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates GMAB as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.6% upside for GMAB (target: $41) vs 14.7% for AAPL (target: $303). AAPL is the only dividend payer here at 0.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricGMABGenmab A/SAAPLApple Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.50$303.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts17109
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.5%+2.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
Genmab A/S (GMAB)100138.39+38.4%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100361.46+261.5%

Apple Inc. (AAPL) returned +110% over 5 years vs Genmab A/S (GMAB)'s -16%. A $10,000 investment in AAPL 5 years ago would be worth $21,049 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Genmab A/S (GMAB)$1.8B$21.5B+1085.3%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)$215.6B$416.2B+93.0%

Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Genmab A/S (GMAB)65.4%36.4%-44.3%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)21.2%26.9%+27.0%

Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Genmab A/S (GMAB)9.31.7-81.7%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)18.436.4+97.8%

Genmab A/S has traded in a 2x–9x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Genmab A/S (GMAB)1.9212.14+532.3%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)2.087.46+258.7%

Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$2B
$93B
2022
$4B
$111B
2023
$7B
$100B
2024
$8B
$109B
2025
$99B
Genmab A/S (GMAB)Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Genmab A/S generated $8B FCF in 2024 (+284% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

GMAB vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is GMAB or AAPL a better buy right now?

Genmab A/S (GMAB) offers the better valuation at 15.4x trailing P/E (23.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Genmab A/S (GMAB) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — GMAB or AAPL?

On trailing P/E, Genmab A/S (GMAB) is the cheapest at 15.4x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, Genmab A/S is actually cheaper at 23.2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Genmab A/S wins at 0.80x versus Apple Inc.'s 1.74x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — GMAB or AAPL?

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc. (AAPL) delivered a total return of +110.5%, compared to -16.2% for Genmab A/S (GMAB). A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus GMAB's +138.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — GMAB or AAPL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genmab A/S (GMAB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.61β versus Apple Inc.'s 1.28β — meaning AAPL is approximately 109% more volatile than GMAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genmab A/S (GMAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — GMAB or AAPL?

Genmab A/S (GMAB) is the more profitable company, earning 36.4% net margin versus 26.9% for Apple Inc. — meaning it keeps 36.4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32.0% versus 31.1% for GMAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GMAB leads at 95.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is GMAB or AAPL more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Genmab A/S (GMAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.80x versus Apple Inc.'s 1.74x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Genmab A/S (GMAB) trades at 23.2x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 8.0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GMAB: 37.6% to $40.50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — GMAB or AAPL?

In this comparison, AAPL (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. GMAB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is GMAB or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genmab A/S (GMAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.61), +138.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GMAB: +138.4%, AAPL: +1027%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between GMAB and AAPL?

These companies operate in different sectors (GMAB (Healthcare) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: GMAB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

💎
Stocks Like

GMAB

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat GMAB and AAPL on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(GMAB: -81.6% · AAPL: 15.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(GMAB: 46.8% · AAPL: 27.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(GMAB: 15.4x · AAPL: 35.4x)