Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) vs TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TKO | 68.9% revenue growth vs HOFV's -12.1% |
| Quality / Margins | TKO | 4.1% net margin vs HOFV's -366.2% |
| Stability / Safety | HOFV | Beta 0.23 vs TKO's 0.75 |
| Dividends | TKO | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; HOFV pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TKO | +50.1% vs HOFV's -62.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TKO | 1.3% ROA vs HOFV's -17.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs -6.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company operates a destination resort and entertainment complex anchored by the Pro Football Hall of Fame in Canton, Ohio. It generates revenue through hotel operations, event hosting, media production, and retail sales — with the Hall of Fame museum serving as the primary attraction. The company's exclusive licensing rights to the Pro Football Hall of Fame brand and its physical location create a unique, defensible position in sports tourism.
TKO Group Holdings is a sports and entertainment company that operates major professional wrestling promotions including WWE and UFC. It generates revenue primarily from media rights deals and content distribution (~60%), live event ticket sales and merchandise (~25%), and sponsorships and advertising (~15%). The company's moat lies in its ownership of iconic, globally recognized wrestling and mixed martial arts brands with decades of fan loyalty and extensive content libraries.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TKO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HOFV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 276.8x HOFV's $17M. TKO is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFV's -3.7%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +61.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.0% | -43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -158.0% | +17.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.5% | +26.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +61.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | -144.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $26.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $251M | $29.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 99.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 83.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.11x | 5.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 4.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TKO delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HOFV. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOFV's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TKO scores 5/9 vs HOFV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.7% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.9% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.45x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432,174 | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $249M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.04x | 8.95x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $44,052 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $69 for HOFV. Over the past 12 months, TKO leads with a +50.1% total return vs HOFV's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TKO at 40.0% vs HOFV's -67.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +8.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.0% | +50.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.5% | +174.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +340.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +1297.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -67.2% | +40.0% |
Risk & Volatility
HOFV is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKO's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TKO currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs HOFV's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.23x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.04 | $226.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.24 | $133.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.7% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 717K |
Analyst Outlook
TKO is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | HOFVHall of Fame Reso… | TKOTKO Group Holding… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $233.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Jan 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | 100 | 0.15 | -99.9% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 457.83 | +357.8% |
TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) returned +341% over 5 years vs Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV)'s -99%. A $10,000 investment in TKO 5 years ago would be worth $44,052 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | $6M | $21M | +269.8% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | $729M | $4.7B | +549.3% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $729M (2016) to $4.7B (2025) — a 23.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -170.8% | -2.6% | +98.5% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 4.6% | 11.3% | +142.5% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 72.8 | 92.5 | +27.1% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 15x–93x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~99x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall of Fame Resort… (HOFV) | -2.64 | -8.72 | -230.4% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 0.44 | 2.26 | +413.6% |
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $2.26 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company generated $-27M FCF in 2024 (+70% vs 2021). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+823% vs 2021).
HOFV vs TKO: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOFV or TKO a better buy right now?
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 99.1x trailing P/E (37.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — HOFV or TKO?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) delivered a total return of +340.5%, compared to -99.3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV). A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth approximately $44K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1297% versus HOFV's -99.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — HOFV or TKO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company (HOFV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.23β versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s 0.75β — meaning TKO is approximately 231% more volatile than HOFV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — HOFV or TKO?
TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is the more profitable company, earning 11.3% net margin versus -263.4% for Hall of Fame Resort & Entertainment Company — meaning it keeps 11.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 17.6% versus -139.9% for HOFV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOFV leads at 71.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — HOFV or TKO?
In this comparison, TKO (0.4% yield) pays a dividend. HOFV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is HOFV or TKO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.75), +1297% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1297%, HOFV: -99.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between HOFV and TKO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 30%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%