Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Samsara Inc. (IOT) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) vs MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) vs Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) vs Teradata Corporation (TDC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | PLTR | 56.2% revenue growth vs TDC's -4.5% |
| Value | TDC | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 36.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | PLTR | 36.3% net margin vs MDB's -3.1% |
| Stability / Safety | CLBT | Beta 0.83 vs PLTR's 1.97 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PLTR | +61.6% vs IOT's -39.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PLTR | 18.3% ROA vs MDB's -2.0%, ROIC 22.3% vs -8.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Samsara is a technology company that provides an IoT platform connecting physical operations data to its Connected Operations Cloud. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its cloud platform — which includes video-based safety, vehicle telematics, equipment monitoring, and site visibility applications — with over 90% of revenue coming from subscriptions. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated hardware-software ecosystem that creates high switching costs and network effects as customers deploy more devices across their operations.
Palantir Technologies builds and operates advanced data analytics platforms that help government agencies and large enterprises integrate, analyze, and act on complex data. It generates revenue primarily through government contracts—particularly with defense and intelligence agencies—and commercial enterprise software subscriptions, with government work historically representing the majority of its business. The company's key advantage lies in its deep expertise in handling sensitive, classified data and its proprietary software platforms that have been battle-tested in national security applications for nearly two decades.
MongoDB is a modern database platform company that offers a flexible, document-based database system as an alternative to traditional relational databases. It generates revenue primarily through its cloud-based MongoDB Atlas service — which accounts for over 60% of total revenue — along with its on-premise Enterprise Advanced licenses and professional services. The company's key advantage is its developer-friendly document model that enables faster application development and its first-mover position in the NoSQL database market.
Cellebrite provides digital intelligence solutions for legally sanctioned investigations by law enforcement and government agencies. It generates revenue primarily from software licenses and maintenance fees for its forensic data extraction and analysis platforms — including its Universal Forensic Extraction Device and DI platform — which help investigators access and analyze digital evidence from locked, encrypted, or deleted sources. The company's key advantage is its deep technical expertise in overcoming device security barriers and its established relationships with government agencies worldwide, creating high switching costs in a specialized, regulated market.
Teradata provides a connected multi-cloud data platform for enterprise analytics, enabling companies to manage and analyze data across hybrid cloud environments. It generates revenue primarily through subscription-based software licenses for its Teradata Vantage platform — roughly 80% of total revenue — with the remainder coming from consulting and support services. The company's key advantage is its decades of expertise in enterprise-scale data warehousing and analytics, giving it deep relationships with large organizations that rely on its proven platform for mission-critical workloads.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PLTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). TDC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PLTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.5B annually — 9.4x CLBT's $476M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 36.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MDB's -3.1%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +70.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $4.5B | $2.3B | $476M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$37M | $1.4B | -$121M | $78M | $274M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$42M | $1.6B | -$71M | $78M | $130M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $194M | $2.1B | $355M | $160M | $305M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +76.9% | +82.4% | +71.6% | +84.2% | +59.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +31.6% | -6.7% | +14.0% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +36.3% | -3.1% | +16.5% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +47.0% | +15.3% | +33.7% | +18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.2% | +70.0% | +18.7% | +18.1% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -90.3% | +6.7% | +81.0% | +2.7% | +46.2% |
Valuation Metrics
At 27.1x trailing earnings, TDC trades at a 88% valuation discount to PLTR's 217.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDC's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLTR's 216.8x.
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.8B | $313.4B | $26.7B | $3.3B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $312.2B | $26.3B | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -103.21x | 217.76x | -189.87x | 43.03x | 27.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.00x | 106.66x | 68.24x | 36.25x | 11.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 216.78x | — | 40.33x | 10.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.24x | 70.02x | 13.32x | 6.86x | 1.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.04x | 47.00x | 8.80x | 6.88x | 23.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 69.96x | 149.19x | 221.51x | 20.34x | 10.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDC delivers a 56.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $57 in annual profit, vs $-3 for IOT. MDB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TDC's 4.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs CLBT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | +21.7% | -2.5% | +16.2% | +56.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.8% | +18.3% | -2.0% | +8.3% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.8% | +22.3% | -8.6% | +18.5% | +54.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.8% | +21.6% | -8.4% | +13.8% | +25.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.03x | 0.01x | 0.05x | 4.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$147M | -$1.2B | -$454M | -$102M | $156M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $228M | $1.4B | $490M | $124M | $420M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80M | $229M | $37M | $23M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -9.95x | — | 7.25x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $55,296 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,474 for TDC. Over the past 12 months, PLTR leads with a +61.6% total return vs IOT's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 159.6% vs TDC's -8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.8% | -18.3% | -17.8% | -25.2% | +6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -39.4% | +61.6% | +22.8% | -28.1% | +32.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.5% | +1649.9% | +56.8% | +116.9% | -22.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +453.0% | -16.9% | +25.5% | -25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +1344.1% | +924.2% | +38.1% | +26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.2% | +159.6% | +16.2% | +29.4% | -8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CLBT is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTR's 1.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDC currently trades 75.4% from its 52-week high vs IOT's 59.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.97x | 1.68x | 0.83x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.66 | $207.52 | $444.72 | $20.86 | $41.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.38 | $66.12 | $140.78 | $11.76 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.4% | +66.1% | +73.9% | +64.0% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 42.3 | 43.7 | 43.9 | 51.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.4M | 39.1M | 1.2M | 1.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IOT as "Buy", PLTR as "Hold", MDB as "Buy", CLBT as "Buy", TDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 57.2% upside for IOT (target: $45) vs 11.1% for TDC (target: $35).
| Metric | IOTSamsara Inc. | PLTRPalantir Technolo… | MDBMongoDB, Inc. | CLBTCellebrite DI Ltd. | TDCTeradata Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $45.42 | $198.71 | $437.20 | $20.67 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 24 | 44 | 8 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | 100 | 106.92 | +6.9% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 797.41 | +697.4% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | 100 | 76.44 | -23.6% |
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 100 | 183.5 | +83.5% |
| Teradata Corporation (TDC) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) returned +453% over 5 years vs Teradata Corporation (TDC)'s -25%. A $10,000 investment in PLTR 5 years ago would be worth $55,296 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | $120M | $1.2B | +942.2% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | $595M | $4.5B | +651.7% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | $65M | $2.0B | +2974.0% |
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | $172M | $476M | +176.8% |
| Teradata Corporation (TDC) | $2.3B | $1.8B | -24.6% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | -187.9% | -12.4% | +93.4% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | -97.4% | 36.3% | +137.3% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | -112.6% | -6.4% | +94.3% |
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -1.1% | 16.5% | +1608.5% |
| Teradata Corporation (TDC) | 5.4% | 6.5% | +21.0% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 188.1 | 282.1 | +50.0% |
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | 340.8 | 58.2 | -82.9% |
| Teradata Corporation (TDC) | 153.4 | 26.9 | -82.5% |
Palantir Technologies Inc. has traded in a 188x–398x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~218x. Cellebrite DI Ltd. has traded in a 7x–341x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsara Inc. (IOT) | -0.45 | -0.28 | +37.8% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | -0.89 | 0.63 | +170.8% |
| MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) | -6.34 | -1.73 | +72.7% |
| Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) | -0.01 | 0.31 | +3200.0% |
| Teradata Corporation (TDC) | 0.95 | 1.16 | +22.1% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Samsara Inc. generated $111M FCF in 2025 (+155% vs 2021). Palantir Technologies Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+554% vs 2021).
IOT vs PLTR vs MDB vs CLBT vs TDC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC a better buy right now?
Teradata Corporation (TDC) offers the better valuation at 27.1x trailing P/E (12.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Samsara Inc. (IOT) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC?
On trailing P/E, Teradata Corporation (TDC) is the cheapest at 27.1x versus Palantir Technologies Inc. at 217.8x. On forward P/E, Teradata Corporation is actually cheaper at 12.0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) delivered a total return of +453.0%, compared to -25.3% for Teradata Corporation (TDC). A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth approximately $55K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1344% versus IOT's +17.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus Palantir Technologies Inc.'s 1.97β — meaning PLTR is approximately 139% more volatile than CLBT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MongoDB, Inc. (MDB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Teradata Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC?
Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.3% net margin versus -12.4% for Samsara Inc. — meaning it keeps 36.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31.6% versus -15.2% for IOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLBT leads at 84.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teradata Corporation (TDC) trades at 12.0x forward P/E versus 106.7x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 94.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOT: 57.2% to $45.42.
07Which pays a better dividend — IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IOT or PLTR or MDB or CLBT or TDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cellebrite DI Ltd. (CLBT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.83)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLBT: +38.1%, IOT: +17.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IOT and PLTR and MDB and CLBT and TDC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.