LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$84M
5Y Perf.+1.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LSE vs XOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$620.85B
5Y Perf.+34.2%
LSE vs XOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LSE | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $84M | $620.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $141M | $323.90B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $28.84B |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 21.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 10.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $43.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $10.68B |
LSE vs XOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LSE
XOM
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leishen Energy Hold… (LSE) | 100 | 101.8 | +1.8% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 134.2 | +34.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSE vs XOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LSE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Exxon Mobil Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
LSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 2.28x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 14.8x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play
XOM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs LSE's -0.6%
- -4.5% revenue growth vs LSE's -5.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XOM | -4.5% revenue growth vs LSE's -5.5% |
| Value | LSE | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 14.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | LSE | 10.6% margin vs XOM's 8.9% |
| Stability / Safety | LSE | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 16.3%) |
| Dividends |