Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) vs Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GRAB | 20.5% revenue growth vs MAPS's -1.9% |
| Value | MAPS | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 38.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | GRAB | 7.9% net margin vs MAPS's 4.4% |
| Stability / Safety | MAPS | Beta 0.86 vs GRAB's 1.41, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MAPS | 11.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; GRAB pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GRAB | -13.0% vs MAPS's -49.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MAPS | 4.1% ROA vs GRAB's 2.2%, ROIC 11.1% vs 3.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
WM Technology operates a leading online marketplace and software platform for the legal cannabis industry, connecting consumers with retailers and brands. It generates revenue primarily through subscription software fees from cannabis businesses (roughly 60%) and advertising services (roughly 40%) on its Weedmaps platform. The company's key advantage is its first-mover position and network effects in the fragmented cannabis market — its marketplace has become the dominant discovery tool for consumers while its software suite creates sticky relationships with retailers.
Grab is a Southeast Asian superapp that offers ride-hailing, food delivery, and digital financial services through a single mobile platform. It generates revenue primarily from its mobility segment — which includes ride-hailing and taxi services — and its deliveries segment — mainly food and grocery delivery — with financial services and enterprise offerings contributing smaller portions. The company's key advantage is its dominant first-mover position across Southeast Asia, creating a powerful network effect where its massive user base attracts more drivers and merchants, which in turn draws more users.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
MAPS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). GRAB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GRAB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 18.8x MAPS's $179M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.9% (GRAB) to 4.4% (MAPS). On growth, GRAB holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $179M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $285M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $267M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +95.0% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | -0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | +18.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.3% | — |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, MAPS trades at a 87% valuation discount to GRAB's 66.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAPS's 0.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GRAB's 40.6x.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $16.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $15.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.49x | 66.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.35x | 40.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.18x | 4.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 2.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.32x | 124.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAPS delivers a 5.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $4 for GRAB. MAPS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GRAB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAPS scores 7/9 vs GRAB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.1% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.25x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52M | $3.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.39x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GRAB five years ago would be worth $3,274 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $279 for MAPS. Over the past 12 months, GRAB leads with a -13.0% total return vs MAPS's -49.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GRAB at 9.5% vs MAPS's -15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -16.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.0% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.5% | +31.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -67.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | -64.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.4% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
MAPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRAB's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GRAB currently trades 63.7% from its 52-week high vs MAPS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.41x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.41 | $6.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.4% | +63.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.6 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 905K | 43.1M |
Analyst Outlook
MAPS is the only dividend payer here at 11.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MAPSWM Technology, In… | GRABGrab Holdings Lim… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Dec 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) | 100 | 7.44 | -92.6% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 100 | 37.09 | -62.9% |
Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) returned -67% over 5 years vs WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS)'s -97%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) | $101M | $185M | +82.0% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | $-845M | $3.4B | +498.8% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) | 14.2% | 4.1% | -70.8% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | 4.4% | 8.0% | +79.3% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) | 2.08 | 0.08 | -96.2% |
| Grab Holdings Limit… (GRAB) | -0.95 | 0.06 | +106.7% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
WM Technology, Inc. generated $25M FCF in 2024 (+65% vs 2021). Grab Holdings Limited generated $134M FCF in 2025 (+113% vs 2021).
MAPS vs GRAB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAPS or GRAB a better buy right now?
WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) offers the better valuation at 8.5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAPS or GRAB?
On trailing P/E, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) is the cheapest at 8.5x versus Grab Holdings Limited at 66.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAPS or GRAB?
Over the past 5 years, Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) delivered a total return of -67.3%, compared to -97.2% for WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS). A $10,000 investment in GRAB five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GRAB returned -64.5% versus MAPS's -93.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAPS or GRAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.86β versus Grab Holdings Limited's 1.41β — meaning GRAB is approximately 64% more volatile than MAPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 30% for Grab Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MAPS or GRAB?
Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is the more profitable company, earning 8.0% net margin versus 4.1% for WM Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAPS leads at 8.0% versus 6.0% for GRAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAPS leads at 95.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MAPS or GRAB?
In this comparison, MAPS (11.8% yield) pays a dividend. GRAB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MAPS or GRAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WM Technology, Inc. (MAPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.86), 11.8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAPS: -93.2%, GRAB: -64.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MAPS and GRAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MAPS is a small-cap deep-value stock; GRAB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MAPS pays a dividend while GRAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.