Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) vs JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) vs Bank of America Corporation (BAC) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | JPM | 14.6% revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9% |
| Value | MUFG | Lower P/E (0.1x vs 11.5x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.75 |
| Quality / Margins | JPM | 21.6% net margin vs MUFG's 15.0% |
| Stability / Safety | BAC | Beta 0.99 vs MUFG's 1.01, lower leverage |
| Dividends | BAC | 2.5% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MUFG's 1.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MUFG | +49.6% vs BAC's +10.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JPM | 1.3% ROA vs MUFG's 0.5%, ROIC 5.4% vs 2.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is one of the world's largest banking and financial services conglomerates, operating primarily through its core subsidiary MUFG Bank. It generates revenue from traditional banking activities — commercial lending, retail banking, and investment banking — with significant contributions from its global corporate banking and asset management divisions. The company's key advantage is its dominant position in Japan's financial system combined with a vast international network that provides deep client relationships and cross-border banking capabilities.
JPMorgan Chase is a global financial services giant that operates as a universal bank offering consumer banking, investment banking, commercial banking, and asset management services. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from lending activities (about 50% of total revenue) and non-interest income from investment banking fees, trading, asset management, and card services. The company's key competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, diversified revenue streams, and fortress balance sheet—which together create significant barriers to entry and provide stability through economic cycles.
Bank of America is one of the world's largest financial institutions providing comprehensive banking and financial services to consumers, businesses, and institutions. It generates revenue primarily through net interest income from its massive loan portfolio — about 60% of total revenue — supplemented by fees from investment banking, wealth management, and trading activities. The company's key advantage is its massive scale and nationwide branch network — the second-largest in the U.S. — which creates a stable deposit base and cross-selling opportunities across its diverse financial services ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 3 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MUFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
MUFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.43T annually — 65.9x BAC's $188.8B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MUFG's 15.0%.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.43T | $270.8B | $188.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.58T | $81.3B | $36.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.90T | $58.0B | $30.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$119.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +58.6% | +55.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.5% | +27.7% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +21.6% | +16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | -15.5% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 29% valuation discount to MUFG's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MUFG offers better value at 0.58x vs JPM's 1.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210.9B | $809.7B | $379.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84.7B | $1.09T | $513.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.25x | 15.21x | 13.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.10x | 13.93x | 11.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.58x | 1.17x | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.46x | 13.15x | 14.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 2.99x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 2.51x | 1.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 30.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $9 for MUFG. BAC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MUFG's 4.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MUFG scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.5% | +16.1% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +5.4% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +8.2% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.11x | 2.18x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19.69T | $281.8B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109.10T | $469.3B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $89.40T | $751.1B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.47x | 0.74x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in MUFG five years ago would be worth $37,466 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,219 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, MUFG leads with a +49.6% total return vs BAC's +10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MUFG at 39.8% vs BAC's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | -7.3% | -10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.6% | +15.7% | +10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.5% | +119.7% | +54.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.7% | +114.5% | +52.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +384.8% | +497.7% | +355.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +30.0% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BAC is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MUFG's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUFG currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs BAC's 86.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.00x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.15 | $337.25 | $57.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.46 | $202.16 | $33.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +89.0% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 48.1 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 9.0M | 30.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MUFG as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.1% upside for BAC (target: $60) vs 11.9% for JPM (target: $336). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.54% vs MUFG's 1.57%.
| Metric | MUFGMitsubishi UFJ Fi… | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | BACBank of America C… |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $336.10 | $60.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 60 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | +1.7% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 14 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $45.78 | $5.13 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +3.5% | +5.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) | 100 | 506.67 | +406.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 72.13 | 263.46 | +265.3% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 273.29 | +173.3% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) returned +275% over 5 years vs Bank of America Cor… (BAC)'s +52%. A $10,000 investment in MUFG 5 years ago would be worth $37,466 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) | $4.2T | $12.4T | +193.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | $106.4B | $270.8B | +154.5% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | $93.7B | $188.8B | +101.5% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s revenue grew from $4.2T (2016) to $12.4T (2025) — a 12.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) | 22.5% | 15.0% | -33.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 23.2% | 21.6% | -7.1% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 19.0% | 16.2% | -14.7% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s net margin went from 22% (2016) to 15% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) | 0.1 | 0.1 | +0.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 16.9 | 12.1 | -28.4% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 18.9 | 14.4 | -23.8% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. has traded in a 0x–0x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has traded in a 10x–17x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi UFJ Fina… (MUFG) | 68.51 | 159.47 | +132.8% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 6.19 | 19.75 | +219.1% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 1.5 | 3.82 | +154.7% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s EPS grew from $68.51 (2016) to $159.47 (2025) — a 10% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. generated $-450B FCF in 2025 (-101% vs 2021). JPMorgan Chase & Co. generated $-42B FCF in 2024 (-154% vs 2021).
MUFG vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MUFG or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 13.0x trailing P/E (11.5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MUFG or JPM or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 13.0x versus Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. at 18.3x. On forward P/E, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0.1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0.00x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s 1.07x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MUFG or JPM or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) delivered a total return of +274.7%, compared to +52.2% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). A $10,000 investment in MUFG five years ago would be worth approximately $37K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +497.7% versus BAC's +355.5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MUFG or JPM or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.99β versus Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.'s 1.01β — meaning MUFG is approximately 2% more volatile than BAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 121% versus 4% for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — MUFG or JPM or BAC?
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21.6% net margin versus 15.0% for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27.7% versus 18.5% for BAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 58.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is MUFG or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.00x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s 1.07x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG) trades at 0.1x forward P/E versus 13.9x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 13.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAC: 21.1% to $60.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — MUFG or JPM or BAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the highest yield at 2.5%, versus 1.6% for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG).
08Is MUFG or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.00), 1.7% yield, +497.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +497.7%, BAC: +355.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MUFG and JPM and BAC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: MUFG is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.