Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Nano Labs Ltd (NA) vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TSM | 33.0% revenue growth vs NA's -48.2% |
| Quality / Margins | TSM | 45.1% net margin vs NA's -261.0% |
| Stability / Safety | NA | Beta 0.67 vs TSM's 1.44 |
| Dividends | TSM | 0.8% yield; 5-year raise streak; NA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TSM | +108.8% vs NA's -53.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TSM | 21.8% ROA vs NA's -4.3%, ROIC 42.7% vs -30.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Nano Labs is a fabless semiconductor company that designs high-performance computing chips for data centers and distributed computing applications. It generates revenue primarily from chip sales to enterprise customers — including high throughput computing chips, smart network interface cards, and vision computing chips — with additional income from software and technology licensing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise in high-performance computing architectures and its early-mover position in China's growing data center chip market.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company is the world's largest dedicated semiconductor foundry, manufacturing advanced chips for technology companies that design but don't produce their own silicon. It generates revenue primarily from wafer fabrication services — with high-performance computing and smartphone chips driving over 80% of sales — supplemented by packaging, testing, and mask-making services. Its competitive moat stems from unmatched manufacturing scale, technological leadership in advanced process nodes, and deep customer relationships that create switching costs for chip designers.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 158200.9x NA's $24M. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NA's -2.6%. On growth, TSM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $3.82T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$66M | $2.79T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $1.72T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$117M | $1.02T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | +59.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +50.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +45.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +26.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | +21.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +42.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.94T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $1.89T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.12x | 35.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.43x | 15.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.88x | 11.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSM delivers a 31.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NA. TSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NA's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSM scores 8/9 vs NA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.2% | +31.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.3% | +21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.4% | +42.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.3% | +33.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $166M | -$1.77T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $2.76T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $199M | $990.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.56x | 315.91x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TSM five years ago would be worth $29,677 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $245 for NA. Over the past 12 months, TSM leads with a +108.8% total return vs NA's -53.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSM at 63.5% vs NA's -36.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | +17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.2% | +108.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.3% | +336.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +196.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +1552.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.5% | +63.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSM's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSM currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NA's 9.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.48 | $390.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.75 | $134.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.4% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36K | 11.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TSM is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | NANano Labs Ltd | TSMTaiwan Semiconduc… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $408.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $90.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jul 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | 100 | 2.71 | -97.3% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 100 | 395.5 | +295.5% |
Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) returned +197% over 5 years vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)'s -98%. A $10,000 investment in TSM 5 years ago would be worth $29,677 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | $0.00 | $41M | — |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | $947.9B | $3.8T | +306.0% |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited's revenue grew from $947.9B (2016) to $3.8T (2025) — a 16.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -17.7% | -2.8% | +84.3% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 35.0% | 45.1% | +28.9% |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited's net margin went from 35% (2016) to 45% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 0.6 | 0.9 | +50.0% |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited has traded in a 0x–1x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Labs Ltd (NA) | -0.28 | -1.67 | -496.4% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 63.95 | 334.65 | +423.3% |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited's EPS grew from $63.95 (2016) to $334.65 (2025) — a 20% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Nano Labs Ltd generated $-176M FCF in 2024 (-379% vs 2021). Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited generated $1.1T FCF in 2025 (+318% vs 2021).
NA vs TSM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NA or TSM a better buy right now?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 35.1x trailing P/E (0.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NA or TSM?
Over the past 5 years, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) delivered a total return of +196.8%, compared to -97.6% for Nano Labs Ltd (NA). A $10,000 investment in TSM five years ago would be worth approximately $30K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSM returned +1552% versus NA's -97.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NA or TSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Labs Ltd (NA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.67β versus Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited's 1.44β — meaning TSM is approximately 116% more volatile than NA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 85% for Nano Labs Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NA or TSM?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.1% net margin versus -278.8% for Nano Labs Ltd — meaning it keeps 45.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50.8% versus -242.7% for NA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — NA or TSM?
In this comparison, TSM (0.8% yield) pays a dividend. NA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is NA or TSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.8% yield, +1552% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSM: +1552%, NA: -97.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between NA and TSM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. TSM pays a dividend while NA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.