Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) vs Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NTST | 30.0% revenue growth vs KIM's 14.2% |
| Value | KIM | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 63.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | KIM | 27.3% net margin vs NTST's 0.1% |
| Stability / Safety | NTST | Beta 0.16 vs KIM's 0.70 |
| Dividends | KIM | 4.3% yield, vs NTST's 4.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NTST | +44.5% vs KIM's +11.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KIM | 3.0% ROA vs NTST's 0.0%, ROIC 2.7% vs 2.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
NETSTREIT is a real estate investment trust that acquires and manages single-tenant net lease retail properties across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from long-term leases—typically 10+ years—with national retailers in e-commerce resistant sectors like grocery stores, pharmacies, and convenience stores. The company's competitive advantage lies in its disciplined acquisition strategy focused on essential retail tenants with strong credit profiles and its internal management structure that aligns interests with shareholders.
Kimco Realty is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use properties across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through collecting rent from retail tenants—with grocery stores serving as anchor tenants that drive consistent foot traffic—and earns additional income from property management and development services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its strategic focus on grocery-anchored centers in high-density metropolitan markets, which provides recession-resistant cash flow due to the essential nature of grocery retail.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
KIM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NTST leads in 1 (Financial Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
KIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 12.1x NTST's $176M. KIM is the more profitable business, keeping 27.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTST's 0.1%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $176M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $185,000 | $584M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $106M | $630M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.4% | +69.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +27.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.9% | +29.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.7% | +3.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.6% | -4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 42.8x trailing earnings, KIM trades at a 84% valuation discount to NTST's 259.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTST's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KIM's 19.4x.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $16.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $23.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 259.63x | 42.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 63.58x | 30.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.44x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.59x | 19.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.89x | 7.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.83x | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KIM delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $0 for NTST. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs KIM's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$14M | $7.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $689M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.04x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth $15,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,826 for NTST. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +44.5% total return vs KIM's +11.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KIM at 8.8% vs NTST's 4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +17.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +11.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.2% | +28.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | +51.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +23.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.8% | +8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KIM's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.16x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.13 | $23.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.00 | $17.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.2 | 76.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NTST as "Buy" and KIM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for KIM (target: $24) vs 1.1% for NTST (target: $21). For income investors, KIM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.33% vs NTST's 4.02%.
| Metric | NTSTNETSTREIT Corp. | KIMKimco Realty Corp… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $24.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.83 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Aug 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 104.68 | +4.7% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 100 | 170.6 | +70.6% |
Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) returned +51% over 5 years vs NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST)'s +38%. A $10,000 investment in KIM 5 years ago would be worth $15,116 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | $24M | $195M | +718.4% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | $1.2B | $2.0B | +74.0% |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | -85.2% | 3.5% | +104.2% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 32.4% | 20.2% | -37.7% |
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 286.3 | 220.5 | -23.0% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 20.9 | 42.6 | +103.8% |
NETSTREIT Corp. has traded in a 115x–286x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~260x. Kimco Realty Corporation has traded in a 7x–132x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~43x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | -0.84 | 0.08 | +109.5% |
| Kimco Realty Corpor… (KIM) | 0.79 | 0.55 | -30.4% |
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
NETSTREIT Corp. generated $110M FCF in 2025 (+256% vs 2021). Kimco Realty Corporation generated $681M FCF in 2024 (+10% vs 2021).
NTST vs KIM: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTST or KIM a better buy right now?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the better valuation at 42.8x trailing P/E (30.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTST or KIM?
On trailing P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the cheapest at 42.8x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 259.6x. On forward P/E, Kimco Realty Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTST or KIM?
Over the past 5 years, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) delivered a total return of +51.2%, compared to +38.3% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST). A $10,000 investment in KIM five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTST returned +41.7% versus KIM's +23.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTST or KIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.16β versus Kimco Realty Corporation's 0.70β — meaning KIM is approximately 325% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — NTST or KIM?
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) is the more profitable company, earning 20.2% net margin versus 3.5% for NETSTREIT Corp. — meaning it keeps 20.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KIM leads at 30.9% versus 25.7% for NTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NTST or KIM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) trades at 30.4x forward P/E versus 63.6x for NETSTREIT Corp. — 33.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KIM: 2.5% to $24.14.
07Which pays a better dividend — NTST or KIM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) offers the highest yield at 4.3%, versus 4.0% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST).
08Is NTST or KIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.16), 4.0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +41.7%, KIM: +23.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NTST and KIM?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.