Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Okta, Inc. (OKTA) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVDA65.5% revenue growth vs OKTA's 15.3%
ValueOKTALower P/E (21.1x vs 21.9x)
Quality / MarginsNVDA55.6% net margin vs OKTA's 6.9%
Stability / SafetyOKTABeta 1.16 vs NVDA's 1.73
DividendsNVDA0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; OKTA pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NVDA+41.9% vs OKTA's -19.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA58.1% ROA vs OKTA's 2.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.8%
Bottom line: NVDA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Okta, Inc. is the better choice for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

OKTAOkta, Inc.
Technology

Okta is a cloud-based identity and access management platform that helps organizations securely connect people to technology. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its identity cloud services — including single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, and lifecycle management — with enterprise customers paying annual contracts. The company's moat lies in its extensive network effects, as its platform becomes more valuable as more applications integrate with it, creating switching costs for customers.

NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Technology

NVIDIA designs and sells graphics processing units (GPUs) and accelerated computing platforms that power artificial intelligence, gaming, and professional visualization applications. The company generates revenue primarily through its Data Center segment — which includes AI chips and systems — accounting for over 70% of sales, supplemented by its Gaming GPU business and professional visualization offerings. NVIDIA's competitive moat stems from its CUDA software ecosystem — which locks developers into its hardware architecture — and its years of architectural leadership in parallel processing for AI workloads.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

OKTAOkta, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
97.9%$2.6B
Technology Service
2.1%$54M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

NVDA 3OKTA 1
Financial MetricsNVDA4/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsOKTA4/6 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyNVDA6/9 metrics
Total ReturnsNVDA6/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityTie1/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). OKTA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 76.0x OKTA's $2.8B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OKTA's 6.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.8B$215.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$207M$133.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$195M$120.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$898M$96.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.1%+71.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.9%+60.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.9%+55.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+31.6%+44.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.6%+73.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+156.0%+97.8%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 36.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 97% valuation discount to OKTA's 1208.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVDA's 32.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OKTA's 79.0x.

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Market CapShares × price$563M$4.31T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.1B$4.31T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1208.33x36.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.06x21.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.38x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple79.03x32.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.22x19.94x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.98x27.52x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.77x44.54x
OKTA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $3 for OKTA. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OKTA's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OKTA scores 7/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.8%+76.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+58.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.8%+81.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.0%+97.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.15x0.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$543M$807M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$409M$10.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$952M$11.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense55.00x545.03x
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $128,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,687 for OKTA. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +41.9% total return vs OKTA's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 96.9% vs OKTA's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.3%-6.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-19.9%+41.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1.7%+663.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-73.1%+1181.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+208.4%+22525.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+0.6%+96.9%
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

OKTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs OKTA's 56.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.16x1.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$127.57$212.19
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$68.77$86.62
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+56.8%+83.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.247.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.0M136.2M
Evenly matched — OKTA and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates OKTA as "Buy" and NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.9% upside for NVDA (target: $271) vs 47.0% for OKTA (target: $107).

MetricOKTAOkta, Inc.NVDANVIDIA Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$106.60$271.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts5179
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.9%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
Okta, Inc. (OKTA)10066.05-34.0%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)1002,686.11+2586.1%

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) returned +1.2K% over 5 years vs Okta, Inc. (OKTA)'s -73%. A $10,000 investment in NVDA 5 years ago would be worth $128,116 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Okta, Inc. (OKTA)$161M$2.6B+1523.1%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)$6.9B$215.9B+3025.0%

NVIDIA Corporation's revenue grew from $6.9B (2017) to $215.9B (2026) — a 46.6% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Okta, Inc. (OKTA)-46.7%1.1%+102.3%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)24.1%55.6%+130.6%

NVIDIA Corporation's net margin went from 24% (2017) to 56% (2026).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)75.636.2-52.1%

NVIDIA Corporation has traded in a 28x–291x P/E range over 10 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20172026Change
Okta, Inc. (OKTA)-0.920.06+106.5%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)0.064.9+7556.3%

NVIDIA Corporation's EPS grew from $0.06 (2017) to $4.90 (2026) — a 62% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2022
$87M
$8B
2023
$63M
$4B
2024
$488M
$27B
2025
$730M
$61B
2026
$97B
Okta, Inc. (OKTA)NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Okta, Inc. generated $730M FCF in 2025 (+558% vs 2021). NVIDIA Corporation generated $97B FCF in 2026 (+1960% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

OKTA vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is OKTA or NVDA a better buy right now?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 36.2x trailing P/E (21.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Okta, Inc. (OKTA) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — OKTA or NVDA?

On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 36.2x versus Okta, Inc. at 1208.3x. On forward P/E, Okta, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21.1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — OKTA or NVDA?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1181%, compared to -73.1% for Okta, Inc. (OKTA). A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth approximately $128K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +225.3% versus OKTA's +208.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — OKTA or NVDA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Okta, Inc. (OKTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.16β versus NVIDIA Corporation's 1.73β — meaning NVDA is approximately 49% more volatile than OKTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 15% for Okta, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — OKTA or NVDA?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.6% net margin versus 1.1% for Okta, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60.4% versus -2.8% for OKTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OKTA leads at 76.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is OKTA or NVDA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Okta, Inc. (OKTA) trades at 21.1x forward P/E versus 21.9x for NVIDIA Corporation — 0.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 52.9% to $271.00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — OKTA or NVDA?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is OKTA or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Okta, Inc. (OKTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.16), +208.4% 10Y return). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a higher beta of 1.73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OKTA: +208.4%, NVDA: +225.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between OKTA and NVDA?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

OKTA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
🚀
Stocks Like

NVDA

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat OKTA and NVDA on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(OKTA: 11.6% · NVDA: 73.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(OKTA: 6.9% · NVDA: 55.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(OKTA: 1208.3x · NVDA: 36.2x)