Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) vs Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | YSG | 0.8% revenue growth vs OLPX's -7.8% |
| Value | YSG | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 19.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | OLPX | -1.2% net margin vs YSG's -11.8% |
| Stability / Safety | YSG | Beta 0.93 vs OLPX's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | YSG | +16.8% vs OLPX's +11.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OLPX | -0.3% ROA vs YSG's -11.9%, ROIC 5.1% vs -10.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Olaplex is a premium hair care company that sells patented bond-building products designed to repair and strengthen damaged hair. It generates revenue through three main channels: professional sales to salons (~30%), specialty retail partnerships (~45%), and direct-to-consumer e-commerce (~25%). The company's key competitive advantage is its patented bis-aminopropyl diglycol dimaleate technology — a unique bond-building molecule that competitors cannot legally replicate.
Yatsen Holding is a Chinese beauty company that develops and sells color cosmetics, skincare, and beauty products under multiple brands including Perfect Diary, Little Ondine, and Galénic. It generates revenue primarily through direct-to-consumer online sales — via its own e-commerce platforms and third-party marketplaces — complemented by physical retail stores across China. The company's competitive advantage lies in its data-driven product development, strong digital marketing capabilities, and multi-brand portfolio that targets different consumer segments across China's beauty market.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
YSG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). OLPX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
YSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 9.7x OLPX's $419M. OLPX is the more profitable business, keeping -1.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to YSG's -11.8%. On growth, YSG holds the edge at +50.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $419M | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $68M | -$60M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$479M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +78.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | -11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.8% | +50.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +40.7% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 54.95x | -4.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.05x | 2.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.46x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 5.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.57x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OLPX delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-16 for YSG. YSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OLPX's 0.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OLPX scores 5/9 vs YSG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.6% | -15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | -11.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | -10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | -11.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $64M | -$668M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $586M | $817M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $650M | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.79x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in OLPX five years ago would be worth $657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $476 for YSG. Over the past 12 months, YSG leads with a +16.8% total return vs OLPX's +11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YSG at -14.4% vs OLPX's -31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +5.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.0% | +16.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.3% | -37.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -95.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | -95.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -31.1% | -14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
YSG is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OLPX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OLPX currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs YSG's 38.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.84 | $11.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $3.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +38.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 61.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 92K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates OLPX as "Hold" and YSG as "Hold".
| Metric | OLPXOlaplex Holdings,… | YSGYatsen Holding Li… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Sep 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) | 100 | 6.45 | -93.6% |
| Yatsen Holding Limi… (YSG) | 100 | 22.46 | -77.5% |
Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) returned -93% over 5 years vs Yatsen Holding Limi… (YSG)'s -95%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) | $148M | $423M | +185.2% |
| Yatsen Holding Limi… (YSG) | $660M | $3.4B | +421.4% |
Yatsen Holding Limited's revenue grew from $660M (2018) to $3.4B (2024) — a 31.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) | 41.1% | 4.6% | -88.8% |
| Yatsen Holding Limi… (YSG) | -6.3% | -20.9% | -230.4% |
Yatsen Holding Limited's net margin went from -6% (2018) to -21% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) | 85.7 | 59 | -31.2% |
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 15x–86x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~55x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Olaplex Holdings, I… (OLPX) | 0.09 | 0.03 | -68.8% |
| Yatsen Holding Limi… (YSG) | -0.05 | -7 | -13157.6% |
Yatsen Holding Limited's EPS grew from $-0.05 (2018) to $-7.00 (2024).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. generated $142M FCF in 2024 (-28% vs 2021). Yatsen Holding Limited generated $-301M FCF in 2024 (+75% vs 2021).
OLPX vs YSG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OLPX or YSG a better buy right now?
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) offers the better valuation at 54.9x trailing P/E (19.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OLPX or YSG?
On forward P/E, Yatsen Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2.5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OLPX or YSG?
Over the past 5 years, Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) delivered a total return of -93.4%, compared to -95.2% for Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG). A $10,000 investment in OLPX five years ago would be worth approximately $657 today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OLPX returned -93.4% versus YSG's -95.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OLPX or YSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.93β versus Olaplex Holdings, Inc.'s 1.40β — meaning OLPX is approximately 50% more volatile than YSG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 74% for Olaplex Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — OLPX or YSG?
Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.6% net margin versus -20.9% for Yatsen Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 4.6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLPX leads at 15.8% versus -12.4% for YSG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YSG leads at 77.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is OLPX or YSG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) trades at 2.5x forward P/E versus 19.1x for Olaplex Holdings, Inc. — 16.5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — OLPX or YSG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is OLPX or YSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Yatsen Holding Limited (YSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.93)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (YSG: -95.2%, OLPX: -93.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between OLPX and YSG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.