Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NBIS | 350.9% revenue growth vs PINS's 15.8% |
| Value | PINS | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 964.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | NBIS | 19.0% net margin vs PINS's 9.9% |
| Stability / Safety | PINS | Beta 1.49 vs NBIS's 2.48, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NBIS | +194.9% vs PINS's -52.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PINS | 7.6% ROA vs NBIS's 0.8%, ROIC 6.2% vs -13.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Pinterest is a visual discovery platform where users find inspiration for everything from recipes to home decor through personalized image and video pins. It generates revenue primarily through advertising — selling promoted pins and shopping ads to brands — with advertising accounting for nearly all of its revenue. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique intent-based discovery model where users actively seek inspiration, creating a high-intent advertising environment distinct from social media feeds.
Nebius Group is a technology company that builds full-stack infrastructure for the global AI industry, including cloud platforms, GPU clusters, and developer tools. It generates revenue primarily through its Nebius AI cloud platform—which serves intensive AI workloads—alongside data services from Toloka AI, edtech from TripleTen, and autonomous driving technology from Avride. The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated full-stack approach to AI infrastructure—combining hardware, cloud services, and specialized tools—and its established R&D expertise across multiple AI domains.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PINS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NBIS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PINS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 7.9x NBIS's $534M. NBIS is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINS's 9.9%. On growth, NBIS holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $534M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $339M | -$287M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $417M | $102M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | -$2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +68.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | -113.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +19.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.7% | -79.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 28.8x trailing earnings, PINS trades at a 97% valuation discount to NBIS's 964.7x P/E.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $23.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $651M | $24.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.80x | 964.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.97x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.04x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 43.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.55x | 5.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.12x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $2 for NBIS. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBIS's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBIS scores 7/9 vs PINS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | -8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$749M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $969M | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $221M | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | -30.21x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NBIS five years ago would be worth $53,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,180 for PINS. Over the past 12 months, NBIS leads with a +194.9% total return vs PINS's -52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBIS at 74.4% vs PINS's -11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -33.8% | +18.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -52.4% | +194.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | +430.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.2% | +430.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | +430.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.1% | +74.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PINS is the less volatile stock with a 1.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBIS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBIS currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.93 | $141.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.84 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.0% | +75.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.2 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.0M | 11.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PINS as "Buy" and NBIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.2% upside for PINS (target: $25) vs 33.1% for NBIS (target: $141).
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | NBISNebius Group N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.33 | $141.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +66.2% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Nov 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 68.71 | -31.3% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 100.7 | 440.8 | +337.7% |
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) returned +431% over 5 years vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)'s -78%. A $10,000 investment in NBIS 5 years ago would be worth $53,060 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | $473M | $4.2B | +792.8% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | $1.2B | $530M | -57.1% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s revenue grew from $1.2B (2016) to $530M (2025) — a -9.0% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -27.5% | 9.9% | +135.9% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 9.0% | 19.2% | +114.4% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s net margin went from 9% (2016) to 19% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 88.7 | 42.4 | -52.2% |
Pinterest, Inc. has traded in a 11x–89x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -0.29 | 0.61 | +310.3% |
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 0.34 | 0.11 | -67.6% |
Nebius Group N.V.'s EPS grew from $0.34 (2016) to $0.11 (2025) — a -12% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Pinterest, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+68% vs 2021). Nebius Group N.V. generated $-4B FCF in 2025 (-677% vs 2021).
PINS vs NBIS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINS or NBIS a better buy right now?
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) offers the better valuation at 28.8x trailing P/E (10.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINS or NBIS?
On trailing P/E, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is the cheapest at 28.8x versus Nebius Group N.V. at 964.7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINS or NBIS?
Over the past 5 years, Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) delivered a total return of +430.6%, compared to -78.2% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). A $10,000 investment in NBIS five years ago would be worth approximately $53K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBIS returned +430.6% versus PINS's -28.0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINS or NBIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.49β versus Nebius Group N.V.'s 2.48β — meaning NBIS is approximately 67% more volatile than PINS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 106% for Nebius Group N.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — PINS or NBIS?
Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) is the more profitable company, earning 19.2% net margin versus 9.9% for Pinterest, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINS leads at 7.6% versus -112.5% for NBIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PINS leads at 80.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PINS or NBIS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PINS: 44.2% to $25.33.
07Which pays a better dividend — PINS or NBIS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is PINS or NBIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) carries a higher beta of 2.48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PINS: -28.0%, NBIS: +430.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PINS and NBIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 250%
- Net Margin > 11%