Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) vs trivago N.V. (TRVG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TRVG | 19.1% revenue growth vs PINS's 15.8% |
| Value | PINS | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 16.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | PINS | 9.9% net margin vs TRVG's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | TRVG | Beta 1.21 vs PINS's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRVG | -30.7% vs PINS's -50.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PINS | 7.6% ROA vs TRVG's 3.1%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Pinterest is a visual discovery platform where users find inspiration for everything from recipes to home decor through personalized image and video pins. It generates revenue primarily through advertising — selling promoted pins and shopping ads to brands — with advertising accounting for nearly all of its revenue. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique intent-based discovery model where users actively seek inspiration, creating a high-intent advertising environment distinct from social media feeds.
Trivago operates a hotel and accommodation meta-search platform that compares prices across booking sites. It makes money primarily through cost-per-click advertising — when users click on hotel listings, trivago gets paid by online travel agencies and hotel partners. Its key advantage is brand recognition in hotel search and a massive database of accommodation options across 53 localized websites in 31 languages.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TRVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). PINS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PINS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 7.7x TRVG's $549M. PINS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRVG's 2.0%. On growth, TRVG holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.2B | $549M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $339M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $417M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +97.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +26.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -84.7% | +191.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, TRVG trades at a 43% valuation discount to PINS's 29.2x P/E.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $68M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $670M | -$44M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.20x | 16.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.11x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.10x | -6.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.58x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.13x | 17.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for TRVG. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRVG's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PINS scores 6/9 vs TRVG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.6% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$749M | -$95M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $969M | $131M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $221M | $36M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.38x | 90.00x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TRVG five years ago would be worth $2,627 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,138 for PINS. Over the past 12 months, TRVG leads with a -30.7% total return vs PINS's -50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINS at -10.7% vs TRVG's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.8% | -30.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.7% | -34.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | -73.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -90.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.7% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TRVG is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINS's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRVG currently trades 50.4% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 44.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.93 | $5.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.84 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.6% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.5 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.7M | 50K |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | PINSPinterest, Inc. | TRVGtrivago N.V. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 46 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +65.3% | +2.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 110 | +10.0% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 31.54 | -68.5% |
trivago N.V. (TRVG) returned -74% over 5 years vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)'s -79%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | $473M | $4.2B | +792.8% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | $754M | $549M | -27.2% |
trivago N.V.'s revenue grew from $754M (2016) to $549M (2025) — a -3.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -27.5% | 9.9% | +135.9% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -6.7% | 2.0% | +130.4% |
trivago N.V.'s net margin went from -7% (2016) to 2% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 88.7 | 42.4 | -52.2% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 52.4 | 19.3 | -63.2% |
Pinterest, Inc. has traded in a 11x–89x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x. trivago N.V. has traded in a 19x–73x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -0.29 | 0.61 | +310.3% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -1.05 | 0.15 | +114.3% |
trivago N.V.'s EPS grew from $-1.05 (2016) to $0.15 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Pinterest, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+68% vs 2021). trivago N.V. generated $3M FCF in 2025 (-89% vs 2021).
PINS vs TRVG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PINS or TRVG a better buy right now?
trivago N.V. (TRVG) offers the better valuation at 16.6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PINS or TRVG?
On trailing P/E, trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the cheapest at 16.6x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 29.2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PINS or TRVG?
Over the past 5 years, trivago N.V. (TRVG) delivered a total return of -73.7%, compared to -78.6% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). A $10,000 investment in TRVG five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINS returned -27.0% versus TRVG's -90.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PINS or TRVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.21β versus Pinterest, Inc.'s 1.49β — meaning PINS is approximately 23% more volatile than TRVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for trivago N.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — PINS or TRVG?
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus 2.0% for trivago N.V. — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINS leads at 7.6% versus 0.3% for TRVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRVG leads at 97.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PINS or TRVG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PINS or TRVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRVG: -90.3%, PINS: -27.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PINS and TRVG?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: PINS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRVG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 13%
- Gross Margin > 58%