Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Permian Resources Corporation (PR) vs Apple Inc. (AAPL) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AAPL | 6.4% revenue growth vs PR's -100.0% |
| Value | PR | Lower P/E (16.3x vs 31.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AAPL | 27.0% net margin vs PR's 24.0% |
| Stability / Safety | AAPL | Beta 1.28 vs PR's 1.34 |
| Dividends | PR | 3.3% yield, vs AAPL's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PR | +34.1% vs AAPL's +9.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AAPL | 31.1% ROA vs PR's 5.2%, ROIC 64.5% vs 8.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Permian Resources is an independent oil and gas company focused on developing crude oil and liquids-rich natural gas reserves in the Delaware Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. It generates revenue primarily from oil sales (roughly 70% of total revenue), with natural gas and natural gas liquids making up the remainder. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated, high-quality acreage position in the core of the Delaware Basin — one of the most productive and cost-competitive oil regions in the United States.
Apple is a technology giant that designs and sells premium consumer electronics — most famously the iPhone — along with related software and services. It generates revenue primarily from hardware sales (roughly 80% of total) and a fast-growing services segment (around 20%) that includes the App Store, subscriptions, and licensing. Its key competitive advantage is a powerful ecosystem that locks users into its hardware, software, and services through seamless integration and high switching costs.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AAPL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $435.6B annually — 111.8x PR's $3.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 27.0% (AAPL) to 24.0% (PR). On growth, AAPL holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $435.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $152.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $935M | $117.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $123.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.2% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +27.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +28.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +15.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.2% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, PR trades at a 60% valuation discount to AAPL's 35.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PR's 0.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAPL's 27.5x.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $3.88T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.97T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.29x | 35.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.44x | 27.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 9.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 53.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.43x | 39.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 133.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $134 in annual profit, vs $8 for PR. PR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 7/9 vs PR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +133.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +31.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +64.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $89.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $154M | $33.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $123.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.62x | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth $49,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,049 for AAPL. Over the past 12 months, PR leads with a +34.1% total return vs AAPL's +9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PR at 22.5% vs AAPL's 21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | -2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.1% | +9.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.8% | +81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.6% | +110.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +1027.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PR's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PR currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs AAPL's 91.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.58 | $288.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.01 | $169.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +91.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 40.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PR as "Buy" and AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for AAPL (target: $303) vs 4.6% for PR (target: $19). For income investors, PR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.35% vs AAPL's 0.39%.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | AAPLApple Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.13 | $303.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 109 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 100 | 664.14 | +564.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 395.1 | +295.1% |
Permian Resources C… (PR) returned +391% over 5 years vs Apple Inc. (AAPL)'s +110%. A $10,000 investment in PR 5 years ago would be worth $49,064 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | $99M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | $215.6B | $416.2B | +93.0% |
Permian Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $99M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR. Apple Inc.'s revenue grew from $215.6B (2016) to $416.2B (2025) — a 7.6% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | -2.3% | 19.7% | +958.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 21.2% | 26.9% | +27.0% |
Apple Inc.'s net margin went from 21% (2016) to 27% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 61.9 | 11 | -82.2% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 18.4 | 36.4 | +97.8% |
Permian Resources Corporation has traded in a 6x–77x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. Apple Inc. has traded in a 13x–41x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~35x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | -3.55 | 1.28 | +136.1% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 2.08 | 7.46 | +258.7% |
Permian Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-3.55 (2016) to $1.28 (2025). Apple Inc.'s EPS grew from $2.08 (2016) to $7.46 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Permian Resources Corporation generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+1717% vs 2021). Apple Inc. generated $99B FCF in 2025 (+6% vs 2021).
PR vs AAPL: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PR or AAPL a better buy right now?
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the better valuation at 14.3x trailing P/E (16.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Permian Resources Corporation (PR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PR or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the cheapest at 14.3x versus Apple Inc. at 35.4x. On forward P/E, Permian Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16.3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PR or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) delivered a total return of +390.6%, compared to +110.5% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth approximately $49K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1027% versus PR's +99.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PR or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.28β versus Permian Resources Corporation's 1.34β — meaning PR is approximately 5% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 167% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — PR or AAPL?
Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26.9% net margin versus 24.0% for Permian Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 26.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PR leads at 37.5% versus 32.0% for AAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PR or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) trades at 16.3x forward P/E versus 31.1x for Apple Inc. — 14.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AAPL: 14.7% to $303.11.
07Which pays a better dividend — PR or AAPL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the highest yield at 3.3%, versus 0.4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL).
08Is PR or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.28), +1027% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1027%, PR: +99.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PR and AAPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (PR (Energy) and AAPL (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced. In terms of investment character: PR is a small-cap deep-value stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. PR pays a dividend while AAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.