Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY) vs General Motors Company (GM) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GM | -1.3% revenue growth vs PSNY's -14.5% |
| Quality / Margins | GM | 1.8% net margin vs PSNY's -89.0% |
| Stability / Safety | GM | Beta 0.89 vs PSNY's 1.34 |
| Dividends | GM | 0.9% yield; 4-year raise streak; PSNY pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PSNY | +20.4% vs GM's +61.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GM | 1.2% ROA vs PSNY's -62.4%, ROIC 1.3% vs -109.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Polestar is a premium electric vehicle manufacturer that designs, develops, and sells high-performance electric cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales—with its Polestar 2 sedan as the current volume driver—and through future planned models like the Polestar 3 SUV and Polestar 4 coupe SUV. The company benefits from its strategic partnership with Volvo Cars and Geely, which provides manufacturing expertise, shared technology platforms, and established distribution networks.
General Motors is a global automotive manufacturer that designs, builds, and sells vehicles under brands like Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales — with North America contributing about 80% of automotive revenue — supplemented by financing operations through GM Financial and connected services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale and manufacturing efficiency, established dealer network, and growing investments in electric vehicles and autonomous driving technology through its Cruise subsidiary.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PSNY leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GM is the larger business by revenue, generating $185.0B annually — 72.5x PSNY's $2.6B. GM is the more profitable business, keeping 1.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PSNY's -89.0%. On growth, PSNY holds the edge at +24.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $185.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.4B | $17.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.3B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $11.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -32.5% | +6.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -95.8% | +1.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -89.0% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.7% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.2% | -5.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -115.4% | -135.3% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $71.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.4B | $180.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.00x | 24.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 6.43x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GM scores 6/9 vs PSNY's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -109.3% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.3B | $109.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $739M | $20.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $130.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.73x | 3.79x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PSNY five years ago would be worth $23,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,284 for GM. Over the past 12 months, PSNY leads with a +2035.8% total return vs GM's +61.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSNY at 63.6% vs GM's 27.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.5% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2035.8% | +61.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +337.6% | +106.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.8% | +52.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.8% | +194.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.6% | +27.4% |
Risk & Volatility
GM is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSNY's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSNY currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs GM's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.49 | $87.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.50 | $41.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.1% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.7 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 220K | 6.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PSNY as "Sell" and GM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for GM (target: $90) vs -35.6% for PSNY (target: $15). GM is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | PSNYPolestar Automoti… | GMGeneral Motors Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $89.93 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar Automotive… (PSNY) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 100 | 141.27 | +41.3% |
Polestar Automotive… (PSNY) returned +133% over 5 years vs General Motors Comp… (GM)'s +53%. A $10,000 investment in PSNY 5 years ago would be worth $23,280 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar Automotive… (PSNY) | $92M | $2.0B | +2101.2% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | $166.4B | $185.0B | +11.2% |
General Motors Company's revenue grew from $166.4B (2016) to $185.0B (2025) — a 1.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar Automotive… (PSNY) | -2.1% | -100.8% | -4603.9% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 5.7% | 1.5% | -74.3% |
General Motors Company's net margin went from 6% (2016) to 1% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2018 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 24.9 | +315.0% |
General Motors Company has traded in a 5x–25x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~24x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar Automotive… (PSNY) | -0.99 | -0.97 | +2.0% |
| General Motors Comp… (GM) | 6 | 3.27 | -45.5% |
General Motors Company's EPS grew from $6.00 (2016) to $3.27 (2025) — a -7% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC generated $-1B FCF in 2024 (-205% vs 2021). General Motors Company generated $11B FCF in 2025 (+260% vs 2021).
PSNY vs GM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSNY or GM a better buy right now?
General Motors Company (GM) offers the better valuation at 24.1x trailing P/E (6.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate General Motors Company (GM) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PSNY or GM?
Over the past 5 years, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC (PSNY) delivered a total return of +132.8%, compared to +52.8% for General Motors Company (GM). A $10,000 investment in PSNY five years ago would be worth approximately $23K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GM returned +194.7% versus PSNY's +132.8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PSNY or GM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Motors Company (GM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.89β versus Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC's 1.34β — meaning PSNY is approximately 52% more volatile than GM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which has better profit margins — PSNY or GM?
General Motors Company (GM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.5% net margin versus -100.8% for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC — meaning it keeps 1.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GM leads at 1.6% versus -89.1% for PSNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GM leads at 6.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is PSNY or GM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GM: 14.3% to $89.93.
06Which pays a better dividend — PSNY or GM?
In this comparison, GM (0.9% yield) pays a dividend. PSNY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PSNY or GM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, General Motors Company (GM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.89), 0.9% yield, +194.7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GM: +194.7%, PSNY: +132.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PSNY and GM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. GM pays a dividend while PSNY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.