Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Range Resources Corporation (RRC) vs ConocoPhillips (COP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RRC | 32.8% revenue growth vs COP's 9.3% |
| Value | RRC | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 23.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | COP | 13.3% net margin vs RRC's 9.6% |
| Stability / Safety | RRC | Beta 0.83 vs COP's 0.99, lower leverage |
| Dividends | COP | 2.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RRC's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | COP | +17.7% vs RRC's +12.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RRC | 8.9% ROA vs COP's 6.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Range Resources Corporation is an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (~70% of revenue), natural gas liquids (~20%), and oil and condensate (~10%) to utilities, midstream companies, and industrial users. The company's key advantage is its large, low-cost position in the prolific Marcellus Shale — one of North America's most productive natural gas basins — with extensive acreage and established infrastructure.
ConocoPhillips is a global independent exploration and production company that finds, produces, and sells crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It generates revenue primarily from selling hydrocarbons produced from its diverse portfolio — including unconventional shale plays in North America, conventional assets worldwide, and oil sands in Canada — with no refining or marketing operations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its low-cost position, large-scale resource base, and operational expertise across multiple geographies and resource types.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
COP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). RRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
COP is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.7B annually — 8.7x RRC's $6.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.3% (COP) to 9.6% (RRC). On growth, RRC holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $59.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $23.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $658M | $7.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $926M | $16.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.3% | -38.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, RRC trades at a 16% valuation discount to COP's 17.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, COP's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RRC's 9.2x.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $139.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $156.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.07x | 17.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.88x | 23.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 6.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.29x | 2.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.58x | 8.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $12 for COP. RRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COP's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RRC scores 8/9 vs COP's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $16.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $204,000 | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $23.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.99x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth $42,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,904 for COP. Over the past 12 months, COP leads with a +17.7% total return vs RRC's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RRC at 16.2% vs COP's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +20.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.1% | +149.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.2% | +306.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +6.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COP's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COP currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs RRC's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.50 | $113.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.32 | $79.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 62.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RRC as "Hold" and COP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 3.8% upside for RRC (target: $43) vs 2.9% for COP (target: $117). For income investors, COP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.94% vs RRC's 0.87%.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | COPConocoPhillips |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.83 | $116.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 61 | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $3.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +3.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 1,346.39 | +1246.4% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 206.76 | +106.8% |
Range Resources Cor… (RRC) returned +323% over 5 years vs ConocoPhillips (COP)'s +149%. A $10,000 investment in RRC 5 years ago would be worth $42,313 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | $1.4B | $3.1B | +128.9% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | $23.9B | $59.7B | +149.8% |
Range Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $1.4B (2016) to $3.1B (2025) — a 9.6% CAGR. ConocoPhillips's revenue grew from $23.9B (2016) to $59.7B (2025) — a 10.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -38.3% | 21.1% | +155.1% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -15.1% | 13.3% | +187.8% |
Range Resources Corporation's net margin went from -38% (2016) to 21% (2025). ConocoPhillips's net margin went from -15% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 12.7 | 12.9 | +1.6% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 11.7 | 14.8 | +26.5% |
Range Resources Corporation has traded in a 5x–33x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x. ConocoPhillips has traded in a 8x–15x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -2.75 | 2.74 | +199.6% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | -2.9 | 6.34 | +318.6% |
Range Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-2.75 (2016) to $2.74 (2025). ConocoPhillips's EPS grew from $-2.90 (2016) to $6.34 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Range Resources Corporation generated $590M FCF in 2025 (+57% vs 2021). ConocoPhillips generated $17B FCF in 2025 (+44% vs 2021).
RRC vs COP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRC or COP a better buy right now?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) offers the better valuation at 15.1x trailing P/E (11.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ConocoPhillips (COP) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRC or COP?
On trailing P/E, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the cheapest at 15.1x versus ConocoPhillips at 17.9x. On forward P/E, Range Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRC or COP?
Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +323.1%, compared to +149.0% for ConocoPhillips (COP). A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth approximately $42K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +306.3% versus RRC's +80.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRC or COP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.83β versus ConocoPhillips's 0.99β — meaning COP is approximately 19% more volatile than RRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 36% for ConocoPhillips — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — RRC or COP?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the more profitable company, earning 21.1% net margin versus 13.3% for ConocoPhillips — meaning it keeps 21.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COP leads at 19.8% versus 16.1% for RRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COP leads at 35.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RRC or COP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) trades at 11.9x forward P/E versus 23.0x for ConocoPhillips — 11.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRC: 3.8% to $42.83.
07Which pays a better dividend — RRC or COP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the highest yield at 2.9%, versus 0.9% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC).
08Is RRC or COP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.99), 2.9% yield, +306.3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COP: +306.3%, RRC: +80.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RRC and COP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.