Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Range Resources Corporation (RRC) vs Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EXE | 187.2% revenue growth vs RRC's 32.8% |
| Value | RRC | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 12.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | EXE | 15.0% net margin vs RRC's 9.6% |
| Stability / Safety | EXE | Beta 0.49 vs RRC's 0.83 |
| Dividends | EXE | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs RRC's 0.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | RRC | +12.2% vs EXE's +11.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RRC | 8.9% ROA vs EXE's 6.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Range Resources Corporation is an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company focused on the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling natural gas (~70% of revenue), natural gas liquids (~20%), and oil and condensate (~10%) to utilities, midstream companies, and industrial users. The company's key advantage is its large, low-cost position in the prolific Marcellus Shale — one of North America's most productive natural gas basins — with extensive acreage and established infrastructure.
Expand Energy Corporation is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on unconventional natural gas resources in the United States. It generates revenue primarily from natural gas sales — with additional contributions from oil and natural gas liquids — through its extensive portfolio of approximately 5,000 wells across key shale plays like the Marcellus and Haynesville formations. The company's competitive advantage lies in its large-scale, low-cost position in premier natural gas basins and its operational expertise in unconventional resource development.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
EXE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). RRC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
EXE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 1.8x RRC's $6.9B. EXE is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRC's 9.6%. On growth, RRC holds the edge at +6.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.9B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $5.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $658M | $1.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $926M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +18.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.5% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +63.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.3% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, EXE trades at a 5% valuation discount to RRC's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EXE's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RRC's 9.2x.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.8B | $25.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.0B | $25.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.07x | 14.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.88x | 12.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 5.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.14x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.29x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.58x | 13.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RRC delivers a 15.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $10 for EXE.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.2% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | -$616M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $204,000 | $616M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.91x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth $42,313 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,500 for EXE. Over the past 12 months, RRC leads with a +12.2% total return vs EXE's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RRC at 16.2% vs EXE's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.9% | -1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | +11.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +323.1% | +185.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.2% | +197.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
EXE is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRC's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RRC currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs EXE's 85.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.50 | $126.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.32 | $91.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RRC as "Hold" and EXE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for EXE (target: $138) vs 3.8% for RRC (target: $43). For income investors, EXE offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs RRC's 0.87%.
| Metric | RRCRange Resources C… | EXEExpand Energy Cor… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.83 | $137.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 61 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.36 | $3182.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | +0.4% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 100 | 353.04 | +253.0% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 104.37 | 249.86 | +139.4% |
Range Resources Cor… (RRC) returned +323% over 5 years vs Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE)'s +185%. A $10,000 investment in RRC 5 years ago would be worth $42,313 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | $1.4B | $3.1B | +128.9% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | $7.9B | $12.1B | +54.0% |
Range Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $1.4B (2016) to $3.1B (2025) — a 9.6% CAGR. Expand Energy Corporation's revenue grew from $7.9B (2016) to $12.1B (2025) — a 4.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -38.3% | 21.1% | +155.1% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -55.8% | 15.0% | +126.9% |
Range Resources Corporation's net margin went from -38% (2016) to 21% (2025). Expand Energy Corporation's net margin went from -56% (2016) to 15% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 6 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | 12.7 | 12.9 | +1.6% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | 1.2 | 14.6 | +1116.7% |
Range Resources Corporation has traded in a 5x–33x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x. Expand Energy Corporation has traded in a 1x–15x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range Resources Cor… (RRC) | -2.75 | 2.74 | +199.6% |
| Expand Energy Corpo… (EXE) | -1,278 | 7.57 | +100.6% |
Range Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-2.75 (2016) to $2.74 (2025). Expand Energy Corporation's EPS grew from $-1278.00 (2016) to $7.57 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Range Resources Corporation generated $590M FCF in 2025 (+57% vs 2021). Expand Energy Corporation generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+75% vs 2021).
RRC vs EXE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RRC or EXE a better buy right now?
Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) offers the better valuation at 14.3x trailing P/E (12.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RRC or EXE?
On trailing P/E, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the cheapest at 14.3x versus Range Resources Corporation at 15.1x. On forward P/E, Range Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 11.9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RRC or EXE?
Over the past 5 years, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) delivered a total return of +323.1%, compared to +185.0% for Expand Energy Corporation (EXE). A $10,000 investment in RRC five years ago would be worth approximately $42K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXE returned +197.4% versus RRC's +80.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RRC or EXE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus Range Resources Corporation's 0.83β — meaning RRC is approximately 69% more volatile than EXE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — RRC or EXE?
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) is the more profitable company, earning 21.1% net margin versus 15.0% for Expand Energy Corporation — meaning it keeps 21.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXE leads at 16.8% versus 16.1% for RRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXE leads at 80.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RRC or EXE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Range Resources Corporation (RRC) trades at 11.9x forward P/E versus 12.0x for Expand Energy Corporation — 0.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXE: 27.7% to $137.80.
07Which pays a better dividend — RRC or EXE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) offers the highest yield at 100.0%, versus 0.9% for Range Resources Corporation (RRC).
08Is RRC or EXE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Expand Energy Corporation (EXE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 100.0% yield, +197.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXE: +197.4%, RRC: +80.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RRC and EXE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.