Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) vs Prologis, Inc. (PLD) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SCCF | 91.9% revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% |
| Value | PLD | Lower P/E (42.6x vs 391.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | PLD | 36.7% net margin vs SCCF's -328.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SCCF | Beta 0.04 vs PLD's 0.85 |
| Dividends | PLD | 2.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SCCF's 1.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SCCF | +27.7% vs PLD's +18.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PLD | 3.3% ROA vs SCCF's -6.7%, ROIC 3.8% vs -2.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Sachem Capital is a mortgage real estate investment trust that provides short-term, first mortgage loans to real estate investors for property acquisition and development. It generates revenue primarily from interest income on its loan portfolio — roughly 90% of total revenue — with additional income from loan origination fees and servicing. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized focus on the underserved short-term lending market for residential and commercial property investors, where it has developed deep underwriting expertise.
Prologis is a global owner and operator of logistics real estate — primarily warehouses and distribution centers — serving e-commerce and supply chain customers. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from long-term leases to logistics companies, retailers, and manufacturers, with property management and development services providing additional income. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale — owning nearly 1 billion square feet of prime logistics space in key global markets — and its deep relationships with major logistics and e-commerce players.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SCCF leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 887.5x SCCF's $10M. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SCCF's -3.3%. On growth, SCCF holds the edge at +82.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -194.3% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.6% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.1% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $132.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $162.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.27x | 35.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 391.67x | 42.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.49x | 16.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.13x | 2.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 87.47x | 26.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLD delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SCCF. PLD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCF's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLD scores 5/9 vs SCCF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -18.4% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.7% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.66x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $283M | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $301M | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 5.27x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth $16,053 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,161 for SCCF. Over the past 12 months, SCCF leads with a +27.7% total return vs PLD's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SCCF at 9.4% vs PLD's 7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.8% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.1% | +24.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +60.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +340.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +7.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SCCF is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.69 | $143.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.94 | $85.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.4 | 67.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PLD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs SCCF's 1.48%.
| Metric | SCCFSachem Capital Co… | PLDPrologis, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $136.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 22 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 100 | 94.77 | -5.2% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 103.04 | +3.0% |
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) returned +61% over 5 years vs Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF)'s +22%. A $10,000 investment in PLD 5 years ago would be worth $16,053 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | $3M | $58M | +1963.4% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | $2.2B | $8.2B | +273.3% |
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not's revenue grew from $3M (2015) to $58M (2024) — a 40.0% CAGR. Prologis, Inc.'s revenue grew from $2.2B (2015) to $8.2B (2024) — a 15.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 82.8% | -68.8% | -183.1% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 39.6% | 45.5% | +15.0% |
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not's net margin went from 83% (2015) to -69% (2024). Prologis, Inc.'s net margin went from 40% (2015) to 45% (2024).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 21.1 | 26.4 | +25.1% |
Prologis, Inc. has traded in a 21x–51x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~36x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sachem Capital Corp… (SCCF) | 0.2 | -0.93 | -564.5% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 1.64 | 4.01 | +144.5% |
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not's EPS grew from $0.20 (2015) to $-0.93 (2024) — a NaN% CAGR. Prologis, Inc.'s EPS grew from $1.64 (2015) to $4.01 (2024) — a 10% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not generated $13M FCF in 2024 (-46% vs 2021). Prologis, Inc. generated $5B FCF in 2024 (+97% vs 2021).
SCCF vs PLD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SCCF or PLD a better buy right now?
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) offers the better valuation at 35.6x trailing P/E (42.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prologis, Inc. (PLD) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SCCF or PLD?
On forward P/E, Prologis, Inc. is actually cheaper at 42.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SCCF or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) delivered a total return of +60.5%, compared to +21.6% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF). A $10,000 investment in PLD five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +340.5% versus SCCF's +21.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SCCF or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.04β versus Prologis, Inc.'s 0.85β — meaning PLD is approximately 2019% more volatile than SCCF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 166% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — SCCF or PLD?
Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45.5% net margin versus -68.8% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — meaning it keeps 45.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53.8% versus -30.9% for SCCF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCF leads at 100.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SCCF or PLD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Prologis, Inc. (PLD) trades at 42.6x forward P/E versus 391.7x for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not — 349.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — SCCF or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Prologis, Inc. (PLD) offers the highest yield at 2.6%, versus 1.5% for Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF).
08Is SCCF or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp. 7.125% Not (SCCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.04), 1.5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCF: +21.6%, PLD: +340.5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SCCF and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.