Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) vs GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) vs Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) vs Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) vs Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GEV | 8.9% revenue growth vs BNRG's -100.0% |
| Quality / Margins | GEV | 12.8% net margin vs SMR's -5.9% |
| Stability / Safety | BNRG | Beta 1.10 vs SMR's 2.36 |
| Dividends | GEV | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; SMR, FLNC, NRGV, BNRG pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLNC | +171.7% vs BNRG's -97.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GEV | 7.8% ROA vs BNRG's -56.8%, ROIC 27.9% vs -150.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
NuScale Power designs and sells small modular nuclear reactors for electricity generation and industrial heat applications. It generates revenue primarily through engineering, procurement, and construction contracts for its modular reactor systems, with future recurring revenue expected from long-term service agreements. The company's key advantage is its proprietary, passively safe reactor design — which is smaller, scalable, and factory-built — offering a standardized nuclear solution with lower upfront capital requirements than traditional large-scale plants.
GE Vernova is a diversified energy technology company that provides power generation equipment and grid solutions across multiple energy sources. It makes money primarily through three segments: Power (gas, nuclear, and hydro turbines), Wind (onshore and offshore wind turbines), and Electrification (grid equipment and power conversion systems). The company's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive energy portfolio—spanning traditional and renewable technologies—and its deep expertise in large-scale power infrastructure projects.
Fluence Energy is a global provider of energy storage systems and AI-powered digital applications for renewable energy integration. It generates revenue primarily through selling battery storage hardware (Gridstack, Sunstack, Edgestack) and providing related services like engineering, maintenance, and energy storage-as-a-service contracts. The company benefits from its joint venture ownership by Siemens and AES Corporation — which provides deep industry expertise, global scale, and established customer relationships in the utility sector.
Energy Vault develops gravity-based energy storage systems that use custom bricks and cranes to store and release electricity. The company makes money primarily through selling its EVx gravity storage platforms and related software solutions to utilities and large energy users. Its key advantage is proprietary gravity storage technology that offers longer duration storage—up to 24 hours—compared to lithium-ion batteries, using low-cost materials like soil and waste materials.
Brenmiller Energy develops and sells thermal energy storage systems that use crushed volcanic rock to store heat at high temperatures for industrial and utility applications. The company generates revenue primarily from selling its proprietary bGen TES systems and related services to industrial customers and power producers. Its key advantage lies in the proprietary rock-based storage technology — which offers durability, scalability, and the ability to provide dispatchable heat or steam on demand using low-cost materials.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 5 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
GEV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FLNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
GEV and BNRG operate at a comparable scale, with $38.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 12.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMR's -5.9%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +26.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $64M | $38.1B | $2.6B | $84M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$627M | $2.3B | -$12M | -$115M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$380M | $4.9B | -$52M | -$145M | -$7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$584M | $3.7B | -$195M | -$75M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.8% | +19.9% | +11.7% | +22.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.8% | +3.7% | -1.6% | -139.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +12.8% | -2.0% | -172.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +9.7% | -7.6% | -89.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +3.8% | +154.4% | +26.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.3% | +6.7% | -6.3% | +11.1% | +65.4% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $249M | $235.5B | $800M | $460M | $10M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$587M | $226.6B | $500M | $434M | $11M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -5.92x | 49.38x | -42.00x | -3.30x | -0.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 61.04x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 101.12x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.19x | 0.35x | 9.95x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 19.61x | 3.69x | 3.56x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 63.45x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-180 for NRGV. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BNRG's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs SMR's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.4% | +39.7% | -10.6% | -179.7% | -151.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.0% | +7.8% | -2.3% | -51.3% | -56.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +27.9% | -12.0% | -90.2% | -150.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -87.8% | +6.6% | -4.3% | -72.6% | -124.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.71x | 0.01x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$836M | -$8.8B | -$300M | -$26M | $722,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $836M | $8.8B | $691M | $27M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $391M | $1M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -8.49x | -1056.88x | -39.41x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $66,674 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8 for BNRG. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +171.7% total return vs BNRG's -97.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 88.2% vs BNRG's -86.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.2% | +28.6% | -32.5% | -38.7% | -62.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.2% | +161.0% | +171.7% | +120.6% | -97.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +24.2% | +566.7% | -16.8% | -10.2% | -99.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | +566.7% | -55.6% | -68.9% | -99.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.1% | +566.7% | -55.6% | -68.9% | -99.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.5% | +88.2% | -5.9% | -3.5% | -86.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BNRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMR's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs BNRG's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.36x | 1.59x | 2.25x | 2.17x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.42 | $894.93 | $33.51 | $6.35 | $52.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.08 | $252.25 | $3.46 | $0.60 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.4% | +97.6% | +46.4% | +47.2% | +2.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.5 | 73.4 | 32.9 | 39.4 | 26.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 23.6M | 2.5M | 4.9M | 3.0M | 466K |
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMR as "Buy", GEV as "Buy", FLNC as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.0% upside for SMR (target: $20) vs -8.3% for NRGV (target: $3). GEV is the only dividend payer here at 0.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SMRNuScale Power Cor… | GEVGE Vernova Inc. | FLNCFluence Energy, I… | NRGVEnergy Vault Hold… | BNRGBrenmiller Energy… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.17 | $834.72 | $21.08 | $2.75 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 27 | 27 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Apr 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 108.21 | 575.22 | +431.6% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 177.32 | +77.3% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 238.34 | +138.3% |
| Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG) | 100 | 4.25 | -95.7% |
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) returned +567% over 5 years vs Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG)'s -100%. A $10,000 investment in GEV 5 years ago would be worth $66,674 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | $373000.00 | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | $29.7B | $38.1B | +28.4% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | $92M | $2.3B | +2355.6% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | $0.00 | $46M | — |
| Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | -190.6% | -3.7% | +98.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -9.2% | 12.8% | +239.1% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -51.0% | -2.1% | +95.8% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | -53.7% | -2.9% | +94.5% |
| Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG) | -130.8% | -15.5% | +88.1% |
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| NuScale Power Corpo… (SMR) | -1.63 | -2.17 | -33.1% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | -10.06 | 17.69 | +275.8% |
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | -0.95 | -0.37 | +61.1% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | -8.23 | -0.91 | +88.9% |
| Brenmiller Energy L… (BNRG) | -20.86 | -1.29 | +93.8% |
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
NuScale Power Corporation generated $-871M FCF in 2025 (-761% vs 2021). GE Vernova Inc. generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+692% vs 2022).
SMR vs GEV vs FLNC vs NRGV vs BNRG: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG a better buy right now?
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) offers the better valuation at 49.4x trailing P/E (61.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) delivered a total return of +566.7%, compared to -99.9% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG). A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth approximately $67K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +566.7% versus BNRG's -99.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brenmiller Energy Ltd (BNRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.10β versus NuScale Power Corporation's 2.36β — meaning SMR is approximately 114% more volatile than BNRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 108% for Brenmiller Energy Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG?
GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12.8% net margin versus -594.6% for NuScale Power Corporation — meaning it keeps 12.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEV leads at 3.6% versus -984.0% for SMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMR leads at 66.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMR: 57.0% to $20.17.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG?
In this comparison, GEV (0.1% yield) pays a dividend. SMR, FLNC, NRGV, BNRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SMR or GEV or FLNC or NRGV or BNRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+566.7% 10Y return). Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a higher beta of 2.17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEV: +566.7%, NRGV: -68.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMR and GEV and FLNC and NRGV and BNRG?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.