Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Snap Inc. (SNAP) vs Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSNAP10.6% revenue growth vs MOMO's -12.0%
ValueSNAPBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsMOMO8.2% net margin vs SNAP's -7.8%
Stability / SafetyMOMOBeta 0.46 vs SNAP's 1.76
DividendsMOMO8.5% yield; SNAP pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MOMO-12.0% vs SNAP's -50.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MOMO5.2% ROA vs SNAP's -6.0%, ROIC 11.2% vs -10.6%
Bottom line: MOMO leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Snap Inc. is the better choice for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

SNAPSnap Inc.
Communication Services

Snap Inc. is a social media company best known for its Snapchat app, which enables visual communication through ephemeral photos and videos. It generates nearly all its revenue from digital advertising — primarily through Snap Ads and AR advertising — with a small portion from hardware sales like Spectacles. Its competitive advantage lies in its strong engagement with younger demographics and its pioneering work in augmented reality features that competitors struggle to replicate.

MOMOHello Group Inc.
Communication Services

Hello Group operates China's leading mobile social and entertainment platforms — primarily Momo and Tantan — that connect users through location-based matching, live streaming, and dating services. It generates revenue mainly from virtual gifting in live streaming (where viewers buy digital gifts for creators), premium subscriptions for enhanced features, and mobile marketing services. The company's competitive moat lies in its massive user network effects within China's social entertainment ecosystem and its deep understanding of local user preferences for interactive, video-based social experiences.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SNAPSnap Inc.
FY 2025
Advertising Revenue
87.4%$5.2B
Other Revenue
12.6%$745M
MOMOHello Group Inc.
FY 2024
Live Video Service
49.5%$4.8B
Value-added Services
49.4%$4.8B
Mobile Marketing
1.1%$105M
Other Services
0.0%$3M
Mobile Games
0.0%$432,000

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

MOMO 4SNAP 1
Financial MetricsMOMO3/5 metrics
Valuation MetricsSNAP3/4 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyMOMO5/9 metrics
Total ReturnsMOMO6/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityMOMO2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

MOMO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SNAP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.5B annually — 1.8x SNAP's $5.9B. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAP's -7.8%. On growth, SNAP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.9B$10.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$372M$1.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$460M$854M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$437M$1.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.0%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.0%+12.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.8%+8.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+11.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%-2.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-139.6%
MOMO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$2.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$797M$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-18.11x8.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.1.14x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.99x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x1.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.82x0.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.69x11.40x
SNAP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MOMO delivers a 7.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SNAP. SNAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MOMO's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNAP scores 6/9 vs MOMO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.2%+7.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.0%+5.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.6%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.1%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$377M$459M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.0B$4.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$653M$4.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.70x14.22x
MOMO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth $5,960 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $772 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, MOMO leads with a -12.0% total return vs SNAP's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOMO at -3.0% vs SNAP's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.6%-2.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.1%-12.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.7%-8.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.3%-40.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.3%-9.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.9%-3.0%
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOMO currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs SNAP's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.76x0.46x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.59$9.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.65$5.12
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.9%+71.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.250.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded45.4M842K
MOMO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates SNAP as "Hold" and MOMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 51.7% upside for SNAP (target: $8) vs 22.4% for MOMO (target: $8). MOMO is the only dividend payer here at 8.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.MOMOHello Group Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.69$8.10
# AnalystsCovering analysts7116
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.83
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+63.9%+7.8%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockFeb 20Feb 26Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)10042.5-57.5%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)10023.31-76.7%

Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) returned -40% over 5 years vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)'s -92%.

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)$404M$5.9B+1366.4%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)$3.8B$10.6B+175.0%

Snap Inc.'s revenue grew from $404M (2016) to $5.9B (2025) — a 34.8% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)-127.2%-7.8%+93.9%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)26.3%9.8%-62.5%

Snap Inc.'s net margin went from -127% (2016) to -8% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 7 Years

Stock20172024Change
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)2.41.4-41.7%

Hello Group Inc. has traded in a 1x–3x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)-0.44-0.28+36.4%
Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)55.58+11.6%

Snap Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $-0.28 (2025).

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$223M
$1B
2022
$55M
$1B
2023
$35M
$2B
2024
$219M
$1B
2025
$437M
Snap Inc. (SNAP)Hello Group Inc. (MOMO)

Snap Inc. generated $437M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Hello Group Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2024 (-7% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

SNAP vs MOMO: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SNAP or MOMO a better buy right now?

Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) offers the better valuation at 8.1x trailing P/E (1.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SNAP or MOMO?

Over the past 5 years, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) delivered a total return of -40.4%, compared to -92.3% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). A $10,000 investment in MOMO five years ago would be worth approximately $6K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MOMO returned -9.5% versus SNAP's -79.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SNAP or MOMO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.46β versus Snap Inc.'s 1.76β — meaning SNAP is approximately 282% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 40% for Hello Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which has better profit margins — SNAP or MOMO?

Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 9.8% net margin versus -7.8% for Snap Inc. — meaning it keeps 9.8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 14.5% versus -9.0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNAP leads at 55.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

05

Is SNAP or MOMO more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNAP: 51.7% to $7.69.

06

Which pays a better dividend — SNAP or MOMO?

In this comparison, MOMO (8.5% yield) pays a dividend. SNAP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is SNAP or MOMO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.46), 8.5% yield). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 1.76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9.5%, SNAP: -79.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between SNAP and MOMO?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SNAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock. MOMO pays a dividend while SNAP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

SNAP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
💰
Stocks Like

MOMO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.3%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat SNAP and MOMO on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(SNAP: 10.2% · MOMO: -2.6%)