Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Snap Inc. (SNAP) vs Weibo Corporation (WB) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SNAP | 10.6% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3% |
| Value | WB | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | WB | 21.1% net margin vs SNAP's -7.8% |
| Stability / Safety | WB | Beta 0.57 vs SNAP's 1.76 |
| Dividends | WB | 7.2% yield; SNAP pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WB | +2.1% vs SNAP's -50.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WB | 5.7% ROA vs SNAP's -6.0%, ROIC 10.3% vs -10.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Snap Inc. is a social media company best known for its Snapchat app, which enables visual communication through ephemeral photos and videos. It generates nearly all its revenue from digital advertising — primarily through Snap Ads and AR advertising — with a small portion from hardware sales like Spectacles. Its competitive advantage lies in its strong engagement with younger demographics and its pioneering work in augmented reality features that competitors struggle to replicate.
Weibo is a Chinese social media platform where users create, share, and discover content—often described as China's Twitter. It generates revenue primarily from advertising and marketing services (~85% of revenue) and value-added services like virtual gifts and membership fees. Its competitive advantage lies in its entrenched position as China's leading microblogging platform with strong network effects and deep integration into Chinese digital life.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SNAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 3.4x WB's $1.8B. WB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAP's -7.8%. On growth, SNAP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$372M | $535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$460M | $372M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $437M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +78.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +33.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.2% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $797M | $913M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.11x | 8.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.82x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.69x | 1.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WB delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SNAP. SNAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs SNAP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.2% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.0% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +10.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.1% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$377M | $15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $653M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.70x | 5.11x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in WB five years ago would be worth $2,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $772 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +2.1% total return vs SNAP's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WB at -14.8% vs SNAP's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.6% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -50.1% | +2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.7% | -38.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.3% | -16.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.9% | -14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WB is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WB currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs SNAP's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.76x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.59 | $12.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.65 | $7.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.9% | +78.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.2 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45.4M | 894K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNAP as "Hold" and WB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.9% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 51.7% for SNAP (target: $8). WB is the only dividend payer here at 7.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SNAPSnap Inc. | WBWeibo Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.69 | $17.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 71 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.73 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +63.9% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 100 | 25.3 | -74.7% |
Weibo Corporation (WB) returned -77% over 5 years vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)'s -92%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | $404M | $5.9B | +1366.4% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | $656M | $1.8B | +167.6% |
Snap Inc.'s revenue grew from $404M (2016) to $5.9B (2025) — a 34.8% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | -127.2% | -7.8% | +93.9% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 16.5% | 17.1% | +4.1% |
Snap Inc.'s net margin went from -127% (2016) to -8% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 66.3 | 8.2 | -87.6% |
Weibo Corporation has traded in a 8x–66x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~9x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap Inc. (SNAP) | -0.44 | -0.28 | +36.4% |
| Weibo Corporation (WB) | 0.48 | 1.16 | +141.7% |
Snap Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $-0.28 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Snap Inc. generated $437M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Weibo Corporation generated $578M FCF in 2024 (-11% vs 2021).
SNAP vs WB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNAP or WB a better buy right now?
Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 8.8x trailing P/E (5.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNAP or WB?
Over the past 5 years, Weibo Corporation (WB) delivered a total return of -76.9%, compared to -92.3% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). A $10,000 investment in WB five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WB returned -16.1% versus SNAP's -79.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNAP or WB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weibo Corporation (WB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.57β versus Snap Inc.'s 1.76β — meaning SNAP is approximately 208% more volatile than WB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SNAP or WB?
Weibo Corporation (WB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.1% net margin versus -7.8% for Snap Inc. — meaning it keeps 17.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WB leads at 28.2% versus -9.0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is SNAP or WB more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 67.9% to $17.18.
06Which pays a better dividend — SNAP or WB?
In this comparison, WB (7.2% yield) pays a dividend. SNAP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SNAP or WB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.57), 7.2% yield). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 1.76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WB: -16.1%, SNAP: -79.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SNAP and WB?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SNAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WB is a small-cap deep-value stock. WB pays a dividend while SNAP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 32%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 12%
- Dividend Yield > 2.8%