Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Snap Inc. (SNAP) vs Weibo Corporation (WB) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSNAP10.6% revenue growth vs WB's -0.3%
ValueWBBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsWB21.1% net margin vs SNAP's -7.8%
Stability / SafetyWBBeta 0.57 vs SNAP's 1.76
DividendsWB7.2% yield; SNAP pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WB+2.1% vs SNAP's -50.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WB5.7% ROA vs SNAP's -6.0%, ROIC 10.3% vs -10.6%
Bottom line: WB leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Snap Inc. is the better choice for growth and revenue expansion. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

SNAPSnap Inc.
Communication Services

Snap Inc. is a social media company best known for its Snapchat app, which enables visual communication through ephemeral photos and videos. It generates nearly all its revenue from digital advertising — primarily through Snap Ads and AR advertising — with a small portion from hardware sales like Spectacles. Its competitive advantage lies in its strong engagement with younger demographics and its pioneering work in augmented reality features that competitors struggle to replicate.

WBWeibo Corporation
Communication Services

Weibo is a Chinese social media platform where users create, share, and discover content—often described as China's Twitter. It generates revenue primarily from advertising and marketing services (~85% of revenue) and value-added services like virtual gifts and membership fees. Its competitive advantage lies in its entrenched position as China's leading microblogging platform with strong network effects and deep integration into Chinese digital life.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SNAPSnap Inc.
FY 2025
Advertising Revenue
87.4%$5.2B
Other Revenue
12.6%$745M
WBWeibo Corporation
FY 2024
Advertising And Marketing
85.4%$1.5B
Value Added Services
14.6%$256M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

WB 4SNAP 0
Financial MetricsWB4/5 metrics
Valuation MetricsTie2/4 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyWB6/9 metrics
Total ReturnsWB6/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityWB2/2 metrics
Analyst Outlook0/0 metrics

WB leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Financial Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.

Financial Metrics (TTM)

SNAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 3.4x WB's $1.8B. WB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNAP's -7.8%. On growth, SNAP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.9B$1.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$372M$535M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$460M$372M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$437M$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.0%+78.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.0%+29.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.8%+21.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+33.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.2%+1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.9%
WB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$898M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$797M$913M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-18.11x8.82x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x0.51x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.82x0.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.69x1.55x
Evenly matched — SNAP and WB each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WB delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-20 for SNAP. SNAP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WB's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WB scores 7/9 vs SNAP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-20.2%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.0%+5.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.6%+10.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-8.1%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.53x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$377M$15M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.0B$1.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$653M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.70x5.11x
WB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in WB five years ago would be worth $2,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $772 for SNAP. Over the past 12 months, WB leads with a +2.1% total return vs SNAP's -50.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WB at -14.8% vs SNAP's -19.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-37.6%-2.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-50.1%+2.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-48.7%-38.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.3%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-79.3%-16.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-19.9%-14.8%
WB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WB is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNAP's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WB currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs SNAP's 47.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.76x0.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.59$12.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.65$7.10
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+47.9%+78.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10028.250.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded45.4M894K
WB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates SNAP as "Hold" and WB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.9% upside for WB (target: $17) vs 51.7% for SNAP (target: $8). WB is the only dividend payer here at 7.16% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSNAPSnap Inc.WBWeibo Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.69$17.18
# AnalystsCovering analysts7122
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.73
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+63.9%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockFeb 20Feb 26Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)10042.5-57.5%
Weibo Corporation (WB)10025.3-74.7%

Weibo Corporation (WB) returned -77% over 5 years vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)'s -92%.

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)$404M$5.9B+1366.4%
Weibo Corporation (WB)$656M$1.8B+167.6%

Snap Inc.'s revenue grew from $404M (2016) to $5.9B (2025) — a 34.8% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)-127.2%-7.8%+93.9%
Weibo Corporation (WB)16.5%17.1%+4.1%

Snap Inc.'s net margin went from -127% (2016) to -8% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years

Stock20172024Change
Weibo Corporation (WB)66.38.2-87.6%

Weibo Corporation has traded in a 8x–66x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~9x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Snap Inc. (SNAP)-0.44-0.28+36.4%
Weibo Corporation (WB)0.481.16+141.7%

Snap Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.44 (2016) to $-0.28 (2025).

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$223M
$646M
2022
$55M
$367M
2023
$35M
$636M
2024
$219M
$578M
2025
$437M
Snap Inc. (SNAP)Weibo Corporation (WB)

Snap Inc. generated $437M FCF in 2025 (+96% vs 2021). Weibo Corporation generated $578M FCF in 2024 (-11% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

SNAP vs WB: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SNAP or WB a better buy right now?

Weibo Corporation (WB) offers the better valuation at 8.8x trailing P/E (5.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Weibo Corporation (WB) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SNAP or WB?

Over the past 5 years, Weibo Corporation (WB) delivered a total return of -76.9%, compared to -92.3% for Snap Inc. (SNAP). A $10,000 investment in WB five years ago would be worth approximately $2K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WB returned -16.1% versus SNAP's -79.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SNAP or WB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Weibo Corporation (WB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.57β versus Snap Inc.'s 1.76β — meaning SNAP is approximately 208% more volatile than WB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 53% for Weibo Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which has better profit margins — SNAP or WB?

Weibo Corporation (WB) is the more profitable company, earning 17.1% net margin versus -7.8% for Snap Inc. — meaning it keeps 17.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WB leads at 28.2% versus -9.0% for SNAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WB leads at 78.9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

05

Is SNAP or WB more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WB: 67.9% to $17.18.

06

Which pays a better dividend — SNAP or WB?

In this comparison, WB (7.2% yield) pays a dividend. SNAP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is SNAP or WB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Weibo Corporation (WB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.57), 7.2% yield). Snap Inc. (SNAP) carries a higher beta of 1.76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WB: -16.1%, SNAP: -79.3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between SNAP and WB?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: SNAP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WB is a small-cap deep-value stock. WB pays a dividend while SNAP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

📊
Stocks Like

SNAP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 32%
Run This Screen
🛡️
Stocks Like

WB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat SNAP and WB on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(SNAP: 10.2% · WB: 1.6%)