Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare trivago N.V. (TRVG) vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TRVG | 19.1% revenue growth vs PINS's 15.8% |
| Value | PINS | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 16.6x) |
| Quality / Margins | PINS | 9.9% net margin vs TRVG's 2.0% |
| Stability / Safety | TRVG | Beta 1.21 vs PINS's 1.49 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TRVG | -29.8% vs PINS's -52.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PINS | 7.6% ROA vs TRVG's 3.1%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.0% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Trivago operates a hotel and accommodation meta-search platform that compares prices across booking sites. It makes money primarily through cost-per-click advertising — when users click on hotel listings, trivago gets paid by online travel agencies and hotel partners. Its key advantage is brand recognition in hotel search and a massive database of accommodation options across 53 localized websites in 31 languages.
Pinterest is a visual discovery platform where users find inspiration for everything from recipes to home decor through personalized image and video pins. It generates revenue primarily through advertising — selling promoted pins and shopping ads to brands — with advertising accounting for nearly all of its revenue. Its competitive advantage lies in its unique intent-based discovery model where users actively seek inspiration, creating a high-intent advertising environment distinct from social media feeds.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TRVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). PINS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PINS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 7.7x TRVG's $549M. PINS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRVG's 2.0%. On growth, TRVG holds the edge at +26.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $549M | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $339M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $417M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.3% | +80.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +7.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +29.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.6% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +191.7% | -84.7% |
Valuation Metrics
At 16.6x trailing earnings, TRVG trades at a 42% valuation discount to PINS's 28.8x P/E.
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$44M | $651M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.62x | 28.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -6.52x | 2.04x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.90x | 1.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PINS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for TRVG. PINS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRVG's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PINS scores 6/9 vs TRVG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.0% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$95M | -$749M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $131M | $969M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $221M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 90.00x | 1.38x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TRVG five years ago would be worth $2,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,180 for PINS. Over the past 12 months, TRVG leads with a -29.8% total return vs PINS's -52.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINS at -11.1% vs TRVG's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -33.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.8% | -52.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.5% | -29.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | -78.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | -28.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | -11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
TRVG is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINS's 1.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRVG currently trades 50.4% from its 52-week high vs PINS's 44.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.83 | $39.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.71 | $13.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +44.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.8 | 32.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 16.0M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | TRVGtrivago N.V. | PINSPinterest, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +66.2% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 30.53 | -69.5% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 100 | 108.86 | +8.9% |
trivago N.V. (TRVG) returned -73% over 5 years vs Pinterest, Inc. (PINS)'s -78%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | $754M | $549M | -27.2% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | $473M | $4.2B | +792.8% |
trivago N.V.'s revenue grew from $754M (2016) to $549M (2025) — a -3.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -6.7% | 2.0% | +130.4% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -27.5% | 9.9% | +135.9% |
trivago N.V.'s net margin went from -7% (2016) to 2% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2019 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 52.4 | 19.3 | -63.2% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | 88.7 | 42.4 | -52.2% |
trivago N.V. has traded in a 19x–73x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~17x. Pinterest, Inc. has traded in a 11x–89x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~29x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | -1.05 | 0.15 | +114.3% |
| Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) | -0.29 | 0.61 | +310.3% |
trivago N.V.'s EPS grew from $-1.05 (2016) to $0.15 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
trivago N.V. generated $3M FCF in 2025 (-89% vs 2021). Pinterest, Inc. generated $1B FCF in 2025 (+68% vs 2021).
TRVG vs PINS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TRVG or PINS a better buy right now?
trivago N.V. (TRVG) offers the better valuation at 16.6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) a "Buy" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TRVG or PINS?
On trailing P/E, trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the cheapest at 16.6x versus Pinterest, Inc. at 28.8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TRVG or PINS?
Over the past 5 years, trivago N.V. (TRVG) delivered a total return of -73.4%, compared to -78.2% for Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). A $10,000 investment in TRVG five years ago would be worth approximately $3K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PINS returned -28.0% versus TRVG's -90.3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TRVG or PINS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.21β versus Pinterest, Inc.'s 1.49β — meaning PINS is approximately 23% more volatile than TRVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for trivago N.V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — TRVG or PINS?
Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) is the more profitable company, earning 9.9% net margin versus 2.0% for trivago N.V. — meaning it keeps 9.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PINS leads at 7.6% versus 0.3% for TRVG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRVG leads at 97.3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TRVG or PINS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TRVG or PINS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, trivago N.V. (TRVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRVG: -90.3%, PINS: -28.0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TRVG and PINS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: TRVG is a small-cap deep-value stock; PINS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 13%
- Gross Margin > 58%