Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LOW | 3.1% revenue growth vs TTSH's -3.0% |
| Value | TTSH | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 21.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | LOW | 7.7% net margin vs TTSH's -1.3% |
| Stability / Safety | LOW | Beta 0.61 vs TTSH's 0.80 |
| Dividends | LOW | 1.8% yield; 16-year raise streak; TTSH pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LOW | +8.3% vs TTSH's -55.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LOW | 12.3% ROA vs TTSH's -1.5%, ROIC 76.2% vs -1.9% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Tile Shop is a specialty retailer of natural stone and man-made tiles along with installation materials and accessories for residential and commercial projects. It generates revenue primarily from tile sales—including marble, travertine, porcelain, and ceramic—which account for the bulk of sales, supplemented by setting materials, tools, and delivery services. The company's competitive advantage lies in its specialized expertise, curated product selection, and physical store footprint that provides hands-on customer service and design consultation.
Lowe's is a major home improvement retailer that sells products for construction, maintenance, repair, remodeling, and decorating through its physical stores and online channels. It generates revenue primarily from retail sales of national brand-name merchandise and private label products — with professional customers representing a growing segment — along with installation services and extended protection plans. The company's competitive advantage lies in its extensive store network, strong brand recognition, and scale advantages in procurement and distribution.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
LOW leads in 5 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TTSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
LOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $86.3B annually — 256.2x TTSH's $337M. LOW is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTSH's -1.3%. On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $337M | $86.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $12.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $6.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +10.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $133M | $148.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $258M | $154.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.50x | 22.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.23x | 20.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.40x | 1.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.68x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOW scores 6/9 vs TTSH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.5% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +76.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +33.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.55x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $125M | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $982M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $7.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 8.90x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $17,610 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,997 for TTSH. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +8.3% total return vs TTSH's -55.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOW at 10.6% vs TTSH's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.2% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.7% | +8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.6% | +35.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.0% | +76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.9% | +335.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.0% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
LOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTSH's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 90.3% from its 52-week high vs TTSH's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.75 | $293.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.96 | $206.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.2% | +90.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 269K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTSH as "Hold" and LOW as "Buy". LOW is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | LOWLowe's Companies,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $289.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 100 | 183.78 | +83.8% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 242.31 | +142.3% |
Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) returned +76% over 5 years vs Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH)'s -40%. A $10,000 investment in LOW 5 years ago would be worth $17,610 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | $324M | $337M | +3.9% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | $65.0B | $86.3B | +32.7% |
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s revenue grew from $324M (2016) to $337M (2025) — a 0.4% CAGR. Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s revenue grew from $65.0B (2016) to $86.3B (2025) — a 3.2% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 5.7% | -1.3% | -123.4% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 4.8% | 7.7% | +62.2% |
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s net margin went from 6% (2016) to -1% (2025). Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s net margin went from 5% (2016) to 8% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 45.7 | 131 | +186.7% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 22.7 | 20.4 | -10.1% |
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. has traded in a 14x–131x P/E range over 7 years; current trailing P/E is ~-34x. Lowe's Companies, Inc. has traded in a 17x–32x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~22x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 0.36 | -0.1 | -127.8% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 3.47 | 11.85 | +241.5% |
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.36 (2016) to $-0.10 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR. Lowe's Companies, Inc.'s EPS grew from $3.47 (2016) to $11.85 (2025) — a 15% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. generated $0M FCF in 2025 (-100% vs 2021). Lowe's Companies, Inc. generated $8B FCF in 2025 (-7% vs 2021).
TTSH vs LOW: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTSH or LOW a better buy right now?
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 22.3x trailing P/E (21.0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTSH or LOW?
On forward P/E, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15.2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTSH or LOW?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) delivered a total return of +76.1%, compared to -40.0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH). A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth approximately $18K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +335.9% versus TTSH's -63.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTSH or LOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.61β versus Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.'s 0.80β — meaning TTSH is approximately 31% more volatile than LOW relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — TTSH or LOW?
Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more profitable company, earning 7.7% net margin versus -1.3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOW leads at 11.8% versus -1.7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is TTSH or LOW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH) trades at 15.2x forward P/E versus 21.0x for Lowe's Companies, Inc. — 5.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — TTSH or LOW?
In this comparison, LOW (1.8% yield) pays a dividend. TTSH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is TTSH or LOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.61), 1.8% yield, +335.9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +335.9%, TTSH: -63.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between TTSH and LOW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. LOW pays a dividend while TTSH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.