Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) vs Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | INR | 60.2% revenue growth vs WDS's -1.5% |
| Value | INR | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 29.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | WDS | 24.1% net margin vs INR's -0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | WDS | Beta 0.82 vs INR's 1.05, lower leverage |
| Dividends | WDS | 5.1% yield; INR pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | WDS | +40.1% vs INR's -7.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WDS | 9.5% ROA vs INR's -0.2%, ROIC 6.3% vs 10.1% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Woodside Energy Group is an Australian oil and gas company that explores for, develops, and produces hydrocarbons — primarily liquefied natural gas (LNG) and crude oil — from assets across Australia, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. It generates revenue by selling LNG (its largest segment), pipeline gas, crude oil, condensate, and liquefied petroleum gas, with LNG exports to Asia being the dominant earnings driver. The company's competitive advantage lies in its ownership of large-scale, low-cost LNG production assets in Australia — particularly the North West Shelf and Pluto projects — which benefit from proximity to major Asian energy markets.
Infinity Natural Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on developing shale resources in the Appalachian Basin. It generates revenue primarily from selling crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids extracted from its Utica and Marcellus shale acreage in Ohio and Pennsylvania. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated acreage position in prolific shale plays — particularly its approximately 63,000 net acres in the Utica Shale — which provides operational scale and resource density.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
WDS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). INR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
WDS is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.2B annually — 84.8x INR's $308M. WDS is the more profitable business, keeping 24.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INR's -0.6%. On growth, INR holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26.2B | $308M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18.6B | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6.3B | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | -$124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +53.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | -4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -40.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.1% | +15.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.1% | -80.8% |
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, INR trades at a 69% valuation discount to WDS's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WDS's 5.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than INR's 4486.8x.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.9B | $751.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46.9B | $751.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.42x | 4.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.82x | 6.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.99x | 4486.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.00x | 2899.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-0 for INR. WDS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INR's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INR scores 6/9 vs WDS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | -0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.5% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +10.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.7B | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.7B | $261M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 109.20x | -0.49x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
Over the past 12 months, WDS leads with a +40.1% total return vs INR's -7.7%.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.1% | +12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.1% | -7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | — |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.0% | — |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.3% | — |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.8% | — |
Risk & Volatility
WDS is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INR's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WDS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs INR's 83.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.51 | $19.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.26 | $11.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.6 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 777K | 153K |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates WDS as "Hold" and INR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.7% upside for WDS (target: $28) vs 20.5% for INR (target: $20). WDS is the only dividend payer here at 5.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | WDSWoodside Energy G… | INRInfinity Natural … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.05 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Feb 25 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 100 | 114.26 | +14.3% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | ∞ | ∞ | NaN% |
Infinity Natural Re… (INR) returned +InfinityK% over 5 years vs Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS)'s +40%. A $10,000 investment in INR 5 years ago would be worth $∞ today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | $4.1B | $13.0B | +218.6% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | $143M | $259M | +80.9% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's revenue grew from $4.1B (2016) to $13.0B (2025) — a 13.7% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 21.3% | 20.9% | -1.7% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 47.6% | 19.0% | -60.0% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's net margin went from 21% (2016) to 21% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 20.9 | 11 | -47.4% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd has traded in a 6x–65x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Woodside Energy Gro… (WDS) | 1.04 | 1.42 | +36.5% |
| Infinity Natural Re… (INR) | 1.16 | 3.72 | +220.7% |
Woodside Energy Group Ltd's EPS grew from $1.04 (2016) to $1.42 (2025) — a 4% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generated $-782M FCF in 2025 (-167% vs 2021). Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. generated $-78M FCF in 2024 (-156% vs 2022).
WDS vs INR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is WDS or INR a better buy right now?
Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) offers the better valuation at 4.5x trailing P/E (6.1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — WDS or INR?
On trailing P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) is the cheapest at 4.5x versus Woodside Energy Group Ltd at 14.4x. On forward P/E, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6.1x.
03Which is safer — WDS or INR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.82β versus Infinity Natural Resources, Inc.'s 1.05β — meaning INR is approximately 27% more volatile than WDS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 51% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — WDS or INR?
Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the more profitable company, earning 20.9% net margin versus 19.0% for Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20.9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INR leads at 36.2% versus 29.8% for WDS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INR leads at 52.1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is WDS or INR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Infinity Natural Resources, Inc. (INR) trades at 6.1x forward P/E versus 29.8x for Woodside Energy Group Ltd — 23.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDS: 36.7% to $28.00.
06Which pays a better dividend — WDS or INR?
In this comparison, WDS (5.1% yield) pays a dividend. INR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is WDS or INR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.82), 5.1% yield). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between WDS and INR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. WDS pays a dividend while INR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.