Compare Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) vs Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) Stock

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 154.8x trailing P/E (36.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 17.8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) delivered a total return of +90.7%, compared to -27.1% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). A $10,000 investment in ZETA five years ago would be worth approximately $19K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZETA returned +90.7% versus SRAD's -27.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.80β versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s 2.05β — meaning ZETA is approximately 156% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500.

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 3.1% net margin versus -2.4% for Zeta Global Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 3.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRAD leads at 12.2% versus 0.4% for ZETA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZETA leads at 60.6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) trades at 17.8x forward P/E versus 36.7x for Sportradar Group AG — 18.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SRAD: 75.2% to $32.00.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.80)). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) carries a higher beta of 2.05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -27.1%, ZETA: +90.7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.