Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) vs Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZK | 46.9% revenue growth vs BABA's 5.9% |
| Value | ZK | Lower P/E (2.3x vs 3.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | BABA | 12.2% net margin vs ZK's -3.7% |
| Stability / Safety | ZK | Beta 0.68 vs BABA's 0.90 |
| Dividends | BABA | 1.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; ZK pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | BABA | +10.2% vs ZK's -0.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | BABA | 6.5% ROA vs ZK's -5.4% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Zeekr Intelligent Technology is a premium electric vehicle manufacturer that designs, produces, and sells battery electric passenger cars and SUVs. It generates revenue primarily from vehicle sales—including its flagship Zeekr 001 and 009 models—alongside sales of electric powertrain components and battery packs. The company benefits from its vertical integration with parent company Geely's manufacturing scale and its focus on the premium segment of China's rapidly growing EV market.
Alibaba is a Chinese e-commerce and technology conglomerate that operates digital marketplaces connecting buyers and sellers. It generates revenue primarily from its core commerce segments — China Commerce (~65%) and International Commerce (~10%) — along with cloud services (~10%) and logistics through Cainiao. Its key competitive advantage is its massive ecosystem network effect, where its platforms like Taobao and Tmall create a self-reinforcing cycle of merchants and consumers that's difficult for competitors to replicate.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
BABA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ZK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 11.2x ZK's $90.6B. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ZK's -3.7%. On growth, ZK holds the edge at +36.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90.6B | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.7B | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3.3B | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.4% | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.8% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $2.66T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.7B | $2.67T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.98x | 18.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.26x | 3.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 104.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 18.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.61x | 233.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs ZK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.8B | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.8B | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.6B | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.40x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in ZK five years ago would be worth $9,459 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,154 for BABA. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +10.2% total return vs ZK's -0.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 19.2% vs ZK's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.4% | +10.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +69.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | -38.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +116.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | +19.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ZK is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZK currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs BABA's 74.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.32 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.91 | $95.73 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.2% | +74.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 33.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 10.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ZK as "Buy" and BABA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.9% upside for BABA (target: $189) vs 24.4% for ZK (target: $33). BABA is the only dividend payer here at 1.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ZKZEEKR Intelligent… | BABAAlibaba Group Hol… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.25 | $188.62 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +0.5% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 24 | Dec 25 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 100 | 94.52 | -5.5% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 210.86 | +110.9% |
ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) returned -5% over 5 years vs Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA)'s -38%.
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | $3.2B | $75.9B | +2283.4% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | $101.1B | $996.3B | +885.1% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's revenue grew from $101.1B (2016) to $996.3B (2025) — a 28.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 3.3% | -8.5% | -360.1% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 70.7% | 13.1% | -81.5% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's net margin went from 71% (2016) to 13% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 8.8 | 2.7 | -69.3% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited has traded in a 2x–9x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~18x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZEEKR Intelligent T… (ZK) | 0.42 | -27.3 | -6600.0% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 34 | 53.6 | +57.6% |
Alibaba Group Holding Limited's EPS grew from $34.00 (2016) to $53.60 (2025) — a 5% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited generated $1B FCF in 2024 (+1615% vs 2021). Alibaba Group Holding Limited generated $78B FCF in 2025 (-57% vs 2021).
ZK vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ZK or BABA a better buy right now?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) offers the better valuation at 18.4x trailing P/E (3.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ZK or BABA?
On forward P/E, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited is actually cheaper at 2.3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ZK or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) delivered a total return of -5.4%, compared to -38.5% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). A $10,000 investment in ZK five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +116.1% versus ZK's -5.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ZK or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.68β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 0.90β — meaning BABA is approximately 32% more volatile than ZK relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — ZK or BABA?
Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the more profitable company, earning 13.1% net margin versus -8.5% for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 13.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BABA leads at 14.1% versus -8.5% for ZK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BABA leads at 40.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ZK or BABA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding Limited (ZK) trades at 2.3x forward P/E versus 3.4x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 1.2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BABA: 30.9% to $188.62.
07Which pays a better dividend — ZK or BABA?
In this comparison, BABA (1.2% yield) pays a dividend. ZK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ZK or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.90), 1.2% yield, +116.1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BABA: +116.1%, ZK: -5.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ZK and BABA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. BABA pays a dividend while ZK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.