Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 16.2x · EV/EBITDA 11.2x · ROE 35.6%. (2007–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.2B | $4.5B | $4.2B | $1.0B | $768M | $197M | $168M | $217M | $108M | $73M | $62M |
| Enterprise Value | $2.2B | $4.5B | $4.2B | $1.1B | $836M | $249M | $210M | $275M | $129M | $73M | $73M |
| P/E Ratio → | 16.17 | 30.40 | 21.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 4.41 | 8.76 | 9.79 | 3.92 | 4.98 | 2.43 | 3.98 | 7.41 | 6.36 | 3.23 | 5.84 |
| P/B Ratio | 4.98 | 9.36 | 11.96 | 7.49 | 5.05 | 1.39 | 1.90 | 8.30 | 5.46 | 1.82 | — |
| P/FCF | 80.81 | 160.56 | 37.91 | 265.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 44.61 | 88.64 | 35.17 | 115.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 8.74 | 9.74 | 4.27 | 5.42 | 3.07 | 4.97 | 9.38 | 7.62 | 3.22 | 6.81 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.23 | 22.35 | 28.24 | 36.79 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 11.70 | 23.50 | 29.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 160.29 | 37.71 | 288.67 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 57.4% | 57.4% | 51.5% | 34.4% | 22.9% | 1.4% | -45.2% | -34.6% | -148.4% | -28.1% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 37.5% | 37.5% | 32.6% | 8.4% | -25.5% | -72.1% | -153.8% | -141.1% | -354.9% | -172.7% | -162.6% |
| Net Profit Margin | 28.8% | 28.8% | 46.4% | -10.9% | -42.8% | -88.5% | -179.4% | -164.5% | -387.1% | -192.3% | -183.1% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 35.6% | 35.6% | 81.6% | -19.7% | -45.0% | -62.5% | -132.4% | -210.1% | -218.8% | -243.9% | — |
| ROA | 26.4% | 26.4% | 48.3% | -8.3% | -21.1% | -29.6% | -45.3% | -44.7% | -66.8% | -66.5% | -82.3% |
| ROIC | 36.0% | 36.0% | 37.7% | 7.3% | -14.3% | -27.1% | -45.5% | -49.5% | -111.0% | -128.0% | -216.7% |
| ROCE | 38.8% | 38.8% | 39.0% | 7.4% | -14.2% | -26.9% | -43.2% | -43.1% | -67.8% | -70.8% | -108.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 1.05 | 1.02 | 0.73 | 1.11 | 3.23 | 2.24 | 1.07 | — |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.56 | 4.72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -0.02 | -0.06 | 0.67 | 0.45 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 2.21 | 1.09 | -0.00 | — |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.04 | -0.04 | -0.14 | 3.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | -0.28 | -0.19 | 23.58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 26.69 | 26.69 | 10.02 | -0.13 | -2.42 | -4.49 | -5.32 | -4.37 | -10.90 | -12.32 | -7.71 |
Net cash position: cash ($88M) exceeds total debt ($80M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 6.71 | 6.71 | 5.97 | 5.16 | 6.89 | 6.87 | 7.71 | 6.12 | 4.63 | 6.69 | 1.93 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.74 | 3.74 | 2.90 | 1.69 | 2.73 | 2.77 | 3.62 | 2.34 | 2.69 | 5.35 | 1.48 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.86 | 1.03 | 2.20 | 1.68 | 2.80 | 1.91 | 2.36 | 4.57 | 1.36 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.82 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.44 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.45 |
| Inventory Turnover | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.73 | 0.64 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 2.27 | 2.31 | 1.27 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 113.35 | 42.79 | 38.76 | 36.73 | 128.86 | 114.44 | 43.15 | 29.92 | 62.22 | 34.85 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 6.2% | 3.3% | 4.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 1.2% | 0.6% | 2.6% | 0.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 1.4% | 0.7% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $245M | $243M | $224M | $198M | $140M | $86M | $54M | $45M | $23M | $12M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 19 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying ADMA stock.
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is 16.2x. The historical average is 25.8x.
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 11.2x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 29.1x.
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is 35.6%. This is above the typical threshold of 15-20% considered good for most companies. The historical average is -99.3%.
Based on historical data, ADMA Biologics, Inc. is trading at a P/E of 16.2x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ADMA Biologics, Inc. has 57.4% gross margin and 37.5% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
ADMA Biologics, Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Single-site manufacturing concentration
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margin Expansion Reflects Mix Shift
Gross margin climbed from 47.8% in 2024Q1 to 69.4% in 2026Q2, a 21.6-point surge, as reported in financial statements, signaling a structural shift toward premium ASCENIV sales.
The 69.4% gross margin in 2026Q2, up from 47.8% in 2024Q1, indicates that ADMA's product mix is increasingly weighted toward high-margin ASCENIV, which appears to be the primary profit engine. Operating margin expanded to 42.2% in 2026Q2 from 26.7% in 2024Q1, reflecting operating leverage as SG&A grew slower than revenue. However, the 2024Q4 net margin spike to 95.2% was driven by a one-time tax benefit, so the 30.4% net margin in 2026Q2 is a more sustainable baseline, though investors should monitor plasma cost volatility and batch timing.
ROIC Inflects on Margin Gains
ROIC improved from 6.9% in 2024Q1 to 8.4% in 2026Q2, with a peak of 12.0% in 2024Q2, based on reported figures, indicating that margin expansion is translating into higher returns on invested capital.
ROIC has trended upward from 6.9% in 2024Q1 to 8.4% in 2026Q2, though it remains below the 12.0% peak in 2024Q2, suggesting that recent debt-financed buybacks have expanded the capital base. The improvement is driven primarily by margin expansion rather than asset turnover, which has declined from 0.31 in 2024Q3 to 0.18 in 2026Q2, reflecting the long plasma manufacturing cycle. ROE of 9.5% in 2026Q2 is modest but improving, and the trajectory suggests that ADMA is compounding returns as it scales its specialty plasma model.
Working Capital Cycle Lengthens
Cash conversion cycle stretched to 589 days in 2026Q2 from 276 days in 2024Q3, as per financial statements, driven by a surge in inventory days to 551, reflecting the long plasma production cycle.
The CCC lengthened from 276 days in 2024Q3 to 589 days in 2026Q2, primarily due to DIO rising from 269 to 551 days, which reflects the 6-12 month manufacturing cycle for plasma-derived products. DSO also increased from 31 to 100 days over the same period, suggesting slower collections or a change in payer mix, while DPO rose from 23 to 62 days, indicating some supplier leverage. This working capital intensity explains the gap between net income and operating cash flow, and investors should monitor whether inventory builds are strategic or indicative of demand softness.
Leverage Rises with Debt-Funded Buybacks
D/E jumped from 0.17 in 2025Q4 to 0.50 in 2026Q2, with total debt at $203.8M, as reported in balance sheet data, reflecting a strategic but rapid increase in financial leverage.
ADMA's D/E rose from 0.17 in 2025Q4 to 0.50 in 2026Q2, driven by $203.8M in total debt, which appears to have funded $130.2M in buybacks in 2026Q1. Despite the increase, interest coverage remains comfortable at 15.67 in 2026Q2, down from 38.88 in 2025Q4 but still well above the 5.88 level in 2024Q1. The leverage increase is notable but appears manageable given the company's strong margins and cash flow, though investors should monitor whether further debt-financed buybacks could strain the balance sheet.
Liquidity Cushion Remains Substantial
Current ratio stood at 6.97 in 2026Q2, with cash of $136.0M, as per balance sheet data, providing a robust buffer against operational shocks despite the long inventory cycle.
The current ratio of 6.97 in 2026Q2, down from 7.13 in 2025Q3 but still high, indicates that ADMA has ample short-term assets to cover liabilities, even with inventory days at 551. Quick ratio of 3.81 suggests that even excluding inventory, liquidity is strong, though the inventory-heavy balance sheet means that a write-down could impact the current ratio. The $136.0M cash position, combined with positive FCF, suggests that ADMA can fund its operations and capital expenditures without near-term liquidity stress.
P/E Misleads on Plasma Model
The P/E of 15.68 appears low, but it obscures the lumpy earnings from batch releases and one-time tax benefits, as reported in financial statements, making EV/EBITDA a more reliable metric.
The trailing P/E of 15.68 is distorted by the 2024Q4 one-time tax benefit that inflated net income, making the forward P/E of 11.81 more indicative of ongoing earnings power. However, the most commonly misapplied ratio is P/E, because plasma-derived product earnings are subject to batch timing and inventory valuation assumptions, which can cause quarterly net income to deviate from cash generation. EV/EBITDA of 10.89 is a better measure, as it normalizes for capital structure and non-cash items, and it aligns with the company's high fixed-cost, long-cycle manufacturing model.