Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -10.1x · EV/EBITDA 24.0x · ROE -308.1%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.7B | $2.5B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $520M | $954M | $817M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise Value | $9.1B | $8.9B | $6.5B | $5.8B | $5.0B | $5.8B | $6.0B | $7.0B | $5.1B | $6.1B | $7.9B |
| P/E Ratio → | -10.06 | — | — | — | — | — | 10.07 | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.47 | 0.54 |
| P/B Ratio | — | — | 5.35 | 3.24 | 0.89 | 1.36 | 1.02 | 1.93 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.11 |
| P/FCF | 161.60 | 153.19 | — | — | — | — | 41.30 | — | — | 11.82 | 71.87 |
| P/OCF | 12.23 | 11.60 | 6.89 | 8.05 | 158.48 | — | 3.97 | 6.25 | 6.16 | 4.92 | 6.30 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 2.85 | 2.18 | 2.01 | 1.83 | 2.12 | 2.00 | 1.72 | 1.44 | 1.59 | 1.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 24.05 | 23.68 | 16.05 | 15.95 | 16.11 | 45.58 | 23.12 | 20.55 | — | 28.88 | 16.18 |
| EV / EBIT | 527.30 | — | 102.95 | 216.64 | — | 72.77 | — | — | 87.69 | 39.76 | 28.01 |
| EV / FCF | — | 540.03 | — | — | — | — | 305.75 | — | — | 40.08 | 246.82 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | 20.6% | 27.1% | 26.0% | 18.7% | 17.8% | 23.2% | 21.6% | 30.3% | 32.5% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 0.5% | 1.6% | 0.6% | -1.6% | -7.9% | -3.2% | -1.1% | -16.9% | -7.0% | -0.7% |
| Net Profit Margin | -8.4% | -8.4% | -6.8% | -6.6% | -8.7% | -3.6% | 2.7% | -6.6% | -15.0% | -14.8% | -9.5% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -308.1% | -308.1% | -65.2% | -38.2% | -37.1% | -13.2% | 10.9% | -31.2% | -41.5% | -31.7% | -17.8% |
| ROA | -4.3% | -4.3% | -3.4% | -3.3% | -3.9% | -1.5% | 1.2% | -3.9% | -7.5% | -6.8% | -4.2% |
| ROIC | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.7% | 0.3% | -0.6% | -2.8% | -1.2% | -0.6% | -8.4% | -3.0% | -0.3% |
| ROCE | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.4% | -0.8% | -3.6% | -1.6% | -0.8% | -9.7% | -3.6% | -0.4% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | — | — | 26.42 | 11.66 | 8.38 | 7.47 | 6.99 | 8.39 | 4.12 | 2.97 | 2.81 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 17.70 | 17.70 | 13.98 | 13.09 | 15.72 | 40.84 | 21.45 | 17.28 | — | 21.41 | 11.91 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | — | 24.98 | 10.98 | 7.69 | 6.97 | 6.52 | 8.04 | 3.73 | 2.82 | 2.70 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 16.96 | 16.96 | 13.22 | 12.32 | 14.44 | 38.12 | 20.00 | 16.57 | — | 20.36 | 11.47 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 386.85 | — | — | — | — | 264.45 | — | — | 28.26 | 174.96 |
| Interest Coverage | -0.05 | -0.05 | 0.26 | 0.11 | -0.16 | 0.43 | -0.49 | -0.09 | 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.73 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 3.62 | 3.62 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| Quick Ratio | 3.62 | 3.62 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 0.99 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.82 | 1.82 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.70 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.29 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.30 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.53 | 0.47 | 0.51 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.50 | 0.46 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.31 | 18.12 | 21.42 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 7.91 | 6.35 | 6.16 | 7.41 | 6.80 | 13.19 | 12.02 | 13.88 | 12.21 | 12.20 |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9.9% | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.6% | 0.7% | — | — | — | — | 2.4% | — | — | 8.5% | 1.4% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.5% | 2.2% | 1.8% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $234M | $228M | $225M | $190M | $185M | $184M | $186M | $187M | $186M | $186M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 24 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BKD stock.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -10.1x. The historical average is 10.1x.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.'s current EV/EBITDA is 24.0x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 24.7x.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -308.1%. The historical average is -29.1%.
Based on historical data, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. is trading at a P/E of -10.1x. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. has 20.6% gross margin and 0.5% operating margin.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 17.7x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative net margins
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
Margins Remain Structurally Thin
Brookdale's gross margin averaged roughly 26% through 2025 but collapsed to -1.2% in 2025Q4, while operating margin swung to 11.9% in 2026Q2, per financial statements, indicating volatile cost absorption.
The 2026Q2 operating margin of 11.9% appears to be a positive outlier, as the trailing twelve-month net margin remains deeply negative at -8.4%, suggesting that one-time gains or cost timing may have driven the quarter. The gross margin volatility, from 27.4% in 2025Q3 to -1.2% in 2025Q4, reflects erratic cost recognition and persistent labor and lease cost pressures. Investors should monitor whether the 2026Q2 margin improvement is sustainable or a temporary reprieve from structural cost burdens.
ROIC Recovery Still Elusive
ROIC turned positive at 2.1% in 2026Q2, up from -0.8% in 2025Q3, but remains far below the cost of capital, as reported in quarterly data, indicating limited value creation.
The improvement in ROIC from negative territory to 2.1% is encouraging but still insufficient to cover Brookdale's high cost of debt and equity, given its leverage. The company's asset-heavy model, with PPE constituting roughly 88% of total assets, requires substantial capital to generate modest returns, as seen in the 0.12 asset turnover. This suggests that Brookdale is not yet compounding returns on invested capital, and the recent positive quarter may not signal a durable trend.
Working Capital Efficiency Stable
DSO remained steady at 6-8 days over the past ten quarters, while DPO hovered around 11-14 days, per financial statements, indicating a stable but tight working capital cycle.
The stable DSO suggests efficient collection of resident fees, but the low DPO relative to DSO implies limited supplier leverage, which may reflect the service-intensive nature of the business. The cash conversion cycle is not fully calculable due to missing DIO data, but the available metrics indicate that working capital is not a major source of cash flow volatility. However, the recent positive working capital swing of $54.6M in 2026Q2 contributed to operating cash flow, highlighting the need to monitor for reversals.
Leverage Spikes as Equity Erodes
Debt-to-equity soared from 12.63 in 2024Q1 to over 50 before equity turned negative, while D/EBITDA peaked at 134.22 in 2025Q3, based on balance sheet data, indicating severe balance sheet strain.
The dramatic increase in leverage, with total debt rising to $5.5B by 2026Q2, has outpaced EBITDA generation, leaving interest coverage below 1 in most quarters. The negative equity position of -$29.0M in 2026Q2 underscores the cumulative losses that have impaired the capital structure. While the reported total debt of $1.3B in 2026Q2 may reflect a reclassification, the overall trend suggests that Brookdale's debt service is becoming less comfortable, and refinancing risk remains elevated.
Liquidity Buffer Thin but Stable
Current ratio improved to 1.14 in 2026Q2 from 0.79 in 2024Q2, with cash rising to $370.4M, as per balance sheet data, but the quick ratio remains identical, indicating no inventory cushion.
The improvement in the current ratio suggests a modest liquidity cushion, but the ratio remains barely above 1, leaving little room for stress. The quick ratio equals the current ratio, reflecting the absence of inventory, which is typical for a service business. However, given the high fixed costs and labor intensity, a severe occupancy decline could quickly erode this buffer, as seen in the 2025Q3 quarter when the current ratio fell to 0.84.
EV/EBITDA Misleads on Leverage
EV/EBITDA of 25.65 appears elevated, but with negative equity and volatile EBITDA, this multiple obscures the true leverage and cash flow generation, as reported in financial data.
The EV/EBITDA multiple is commonly applied to senior living operators, but for Brookdale, it is distorted by the company's negative equity and the volatility of EBITDA, which swung from negative in 2025Q3 to positive in 2026Q2. A more appropriate metric would be EV/EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, and rent), which normalizes for the heavy lease obligations that are fundamental to the business. Investors should also consider the quality of earnings, as the recent positive net income may be driven by non-cash items or one-time gains, rather than sustainable operations.