Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio -0.7x · EV/EBITDA N/A · ROE -654.4%. (2021–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $154M | $203M | $1.5B | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $111M | $160M | $1.5B | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | -0.70 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 3.99 | 5.26 | 981.05 | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 3.69 | 5.21 | 62.90 | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 4.13 | 982.01 | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 12.9% | 12.9% | 62.7% | 5.2% | 21.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -237.6% | -237.6% | -3065.3% | -999.2% | -1307.4% | — |
| Net Profit Margin | -535.6% | -535.6% | -3937.9% | -2271.5% | -2724.0% | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | -654.4% | -654.4% | -221.0% | -281.2% | -98.5% | -0.0% |
| ROA | -274.8% | -274.8% | -101.2% | -190.7% | -66.9% | -0.0% |
| ROIC | -652.6% | -652.6% | -91.5% | -55.2% | -35.7% | — |
| ROCE | -197.1% | -197.1% | -126.2% | -191.3% | -34.4% | -0.0% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.68 | — | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | -1.12 | 0.06 | 0.68 | — | -0.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | -13.91 |
| Interest Coverage | — | — | — | -0.99 | -0.88 | — |
Net cash position: cash ($46M) exceeds total debt ($2M)
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 2.23 | 2.23 | 0.05 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 2.67 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.99 | 1.99 | 0.05 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 2.67 |
| Cash Ratio | 1.06 | 1.06 | 0.00 | — | 0.24 | 2.20 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.38 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.20 | — |
| Inventory Turnover | 3.32 | 3.32 | — | 0.56 | 0.70 | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | 346.68 | 12.92 | 30.19 | 200.51 | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $104M | $102M | $102M | $404M | $421M |
Unsustainable cash burn rate
Based on reported figures, BZAI trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 4.25, a multiple that appears disconnected from the company's negative net margins and suggests investors are pricing in aggressive future growth rather than current fundamental performance or established earnings power.
The lack of a meaningful P/E or EV/EBITDA multiple reflects the company's pre-profitability status, forcing reliance on top-line multiples that may overstate value if growth fails to scale. Investors should monitor whether this valuation premium can be sustained as the market shifts focus from narrative-driven growth to tangible path-to-profitability milestones.
As reported in financial statements, the company's ROIC of -115.9% in 2025Q1 highlights a severe inability to generate returns on invested capital, indicating that current R&D and operational spending are significantly eroding shareholder value rather than building a sustainable competitive advantage.
The persistent negative returns suggest that the company's proprietary GSP architecture has yet to achieve the commercial scale required to offset its heavy fixed-cost base. This trend warrants further investigation into whether the current capital allocation strategy is capable of ever reaching a positive return threshold.
According to recent SEC filings, the company's cash conversion cycle has exhibited extreme volatility, swinging from -1470 days in 2025Q1 to 47 days in 2025Q4, which suggests significant challenges in managing inventory and supplier leverage during its current phase of commercial deployment.
The erratic nature of these metrics implies that the company's operational processes are not yet standardized, likely due to lumpy, project-based revenue recognition. Such instability in working capital management may continue to pressure liquidity until the company achieves a more predictable, recurring revenue stream.
Based on the provided quarterly data, the current ratio has fluctuated wildly between 0.05 and 2.46, indicating that the company's ability to meet short-term obligations is highly sensitive to the timing of external capital infusions rather than internal cash generation.
This reliance on external financing to maintain liquidity creates a vulnerable balance sheet profile, particularly in a high-interest-rate environment. Investors should monitor the company's cash runway closely, as any delay in project-based revenue could necessitate dilutive capital raises to sustain operations.
The 2385% YoY revenue growth is a metric frequently misapplied to this business model, as it obscures the underlying lack of margin discipline and likely reflects lumpy, non-recurring engineering fees rather than a sustainable, scalable product-led growth trajectory.
Analysts should prioritize gross margin expansion and AI Studio seat adoption over top-line growth, as the latter can be artificially inflated by one-time contracts. Focusing on revenue growth alone risks ignoring the fundamental value destruction occurring at the gross and operating margin levels.
Includes 30+ ratios · 5 years · Updated daily
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
See how regular investing compounds over time.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying BZAI stock.
Blaize Holdings, Inc.'s current P/E ratio is -0.7x. This places it at the 50th percentile of its historical range.
Blaize Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity (ROE) is -654.4%. The historical average is -150.2%.
Based on historical data, Blaize Holdings, Inc. is trading at a P/E of -0.7x. This is at the 50th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. has 12.9% gross margin and -237.6% operating margin.