Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 31.7x · EV/EBITDA 13.8x · ROE 9.7%. (2001–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $37.6B | $32.3B | $29.3B | $30.3B | $28.4B | $32.8B | $30.0B | $28.7B | $27.8B | $27.5B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise Value | $37.7B | $33.4B | $36.2B | $40.2B | $21.7B | $31.9B | $30.3B | $6.1B | $1.9B | $375M | $-4849982805 |
| P/E Ratio → | 31.66 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
| P/S Ratio | 5.22 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| P/B Ratio | 3.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 2.16 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| P/FCF | 24.71 | 0.65 | 0.58 | 1.24 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 8.98 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.84 | 0.60 |
| P/OCF | 15.81 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.38 |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.02 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.80 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.47 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.06 |
| EV / EBIT | 25.21 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.46 | 0.69 | 0.70 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.01 | -0.10 |
| EV / FCF | — | 0.67 | 0.72 | 1.65 | 0.51 | 0.81 | 9.06 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.12 |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 36.5% | 35.9% | 36.0% | 36.6% | 35.5% | 34.0% | 35.3% | 35.2% | 35.5% | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 20.7% | 20.7% | 20.5% | 20.9% | 21.7% | 21.5% | 20.4% | 21.4% | 20.3% | 20.5% | 20.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 16.5% | 16.5% | 16.3% | 16.7% | 16.9% | 17.0% | 16.1% | 18.4% | 16.5% | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 9.7% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 9.4% | 9.3% | 17.7% | 16.8% | 8.5% | 9.3% | 10.4% | 10.8% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 7.1% | 7.0% | 13.4% | 13.5% | 7.0% | 7.7% | 8.7% | 8.9% |
| ROIC | 9.1% | 9.1% | 8.7% | 8.8% | 9.1% | 16.7% | 16.9% | 8.0% | 9.3% | 10.2% | 10.5% |
| ROCE | 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 10.4% | 19.4% | 19.9% | 9.4% | 11.0% | 12.0% | 12.3% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.03 | -0.02 | -0.00 | 0.02 | -0.06 | -0.07 | -0.07 | -0.08 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.11 | -0.08 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.30 | -0.33 | -0.35 | -0.36 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.40 | -0.16 | -0.02 | 0.08 | -0.47 | -0.70 | -0.83 | -0.71 |
| Interest Coverage | 136.86 | 136.86 | 142.12 | 148.36 | 180.48 | 212.32 | 208.89 | 12286.42 | 2557.63 | 2172.76 | 2469.69 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 1.52 | 1.50 | 1.37 | 1.14 | 1.42 | 1.49 | 1.32 | 1.36 |
| Quick Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.21 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.16 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 | 1.14 | 1.20 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.63 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.44 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 11.51 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.51 |
| Inventory Turnover | 9.74 | 9.74 | 10.40 | 10.31 | 9.30 | 9.54 | 310.28 | 5.90 | 7.95 | 13.47 | 16.04 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.2% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Payout Ratio | 100.8% | 100.8% | 99.2% | 98.7% | 98.3% | 93.8% | 98.1% | 105.5% | 104.8% | 98.6% | 106.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 3.2% | 119.6% | 127.2% | 121.8% | 128.5% | 109.0% | 111.3% | 114.4% | 127.7% | 141.1% | 163.5% |
| FCF Yield | 4.0% | 153.4% | 171.7% | 80.4% | 149.7% | 119.8% | 11.1% | 167.2% | 134.3% | 119.0% | 167.9% |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 3.2% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $775M | $777M | $777M | $777M | $777M | $776M | $777M | $777M | $777M | $777M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 25 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying CHT stock.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s current P/E ratio is 31.7x. The historical average is 0.6x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s current EV/EBITDA is 13.8x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 0.2x.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s return on equity (ROE) is 9.7%. The historical average is 12.1%.
Based on historical data, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. is trading at a P/E of 31.7x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s current dividend yield is 3.18% with a payout ratio of 100.8%.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. has 36.5% gross margin and 20.7% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.'s Debt/EBITDA ratio is 0.4x, indicating low leverage. A ratio below 2x is generally considered financially healthy.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Dividend coverage and valuation
Premium Multiple Anchored to Yield
CHT trades at 27.3x trailing earnings and 11.9x EV/EBITDA, a premium to regional peers, supported by a 3.7% dividend yield that remains competitive against Taiwan's low-rate environment, according to current market data.
The P/E of 27.3x is roughly double the peer median of 14.4x, suggesting the market is paying for stability and defensive cash flows rather than growth, given the modest 2.7% revenue expansion. The forward P/E of 0.83x is distorted by data anomalies and should be disregarded; instead, the PEG of 9.05x indicates that earnings growth is minimal relative to the multiple. The dividend yield of 3.7% is below the 4.4% offered by KT and 8.1% by TLK, but CHT's fortress balance sheet and government backing may justify a lower risk premium, though the valuation leaves little room for earnings disappointment.
Earned ROE Lags Authorized Return
CHT's quarterly ROE has held at 2.4%-2.6% over the past ten quarters, translating to an annualized ~10%, which appears below the typical authorized ROE for regulated telecoms, based on reported financial statements.
The stable but sub-10% annualized ROE suggests that CHT is earning close to its cost of equity but may not be generating excess returns above its regulatory allowed return, which is typically set around 8-10% for telecom incumbents. The consistency of ROE across quarters indicates effective cost management, but the lack of upward movement implies that 5G and ICT investments are not yet yielding returns above the allowed threshold. Investors should monitor whether the regulatory framework allows for returns on new investments, as the current ROE suggests limited regulatory outperformance.
Margins Stable Amid Cost Pressures
Operating margin has remained in a tight 17.6%-22.6% band over the last ten quarters, with 2026Q2 at 21.6%, indicating effective cost recovery despite rising depreciation from 5G and fiber investments, as reported in financial statements.
The stability of operating margins, despite a steady increase in D&A to $10.2B in 2026Q2, suggests that CHT is successfully passing through cost increases or offsetting them with operational efficiencies. The gross margin of 36.5% reflects the capital-intensive nature of the business, but the operating margin of 21.6% indicates that the company is able to cover its fixed costs and generate healthy profits. However, the recent dip in operating margin to 17.6% in 2025Q4 highlights potential quarterly volatility, possibly due to one-time items or timing of expenses, which warrants monitoring.
Fortress Balance Sheet with Minimal Debt
CHT's debt-to-capital ratio stands at 0.09, with interest coverage of 132.5x and FFO-to-debt of 230.3x, indicating exceptional credit quality and ample financial flexibility, based on reported figures.
The near-zero leverage is a defining characteristic of CHT, distinguishing it from global peers like SK Telecom (D/E 0.86) and PLDT (D/E 2.80). This fortress balance sheet provides a significant cushion against rising interest rates and allows the company to fund its CAPEX program internally without refinancing risk. The high interest coverage and FFO-to-debt ratios suggest that CHT could easily take on additional debt if needed, but the conservative capital structure may also indicate a lack of growth opportunities or a deliberate strategy to prioritize dividend stability over expansion.
Dividend Coverage Under Scrutiny
CHT's dividend yield of 3.7% is flagged as not well covered by earnings, with a payout ratio that may exceed net income, suggesting potential reliance on cash reserves to maintain distributions, according to external analyses.
The dividend payout ratio appears to be around 100% or higher based on the 2025Q3 and 2024Q3 data showing a 4.1% payout ratio, but this is likely a quarterly figure that annualizes to a higher percentage. The concern is that the dividend may be funded by cash reserves rather than operating earnings, which is unsustainable in the long term. However, CHT's strong cash generation (OCF of $20.6B in 2026Q2) and minimal debt provide a buffer, but investors should monitor whether the payout ratio remains elevated as CAPEX for network hardening increases.
Misapplied P/E to a Bond Proxy
The most commonly misapplied ratio for CHT is the P/E multiple, which is often compared to growth-oriented tech companies, but CHT's valuation should be anchored to its dividend yield and regulatory allowed return, as it functions as a bond proxy.
Using a standard P/E to value CHT obscures the fact that its earnings are highly predictable and regulated, and that the primary return driver is the dividend yield, not capital appreciation. A more appropriate metric is the dividend yield relative to Taiwan's 10-year government bond yield, which would highlight CHT's attractiveness as a fixed-income alternative. Additionally, the P/E is inflated by the low earnings base due to high depreciation from 5G investments, which may not reflect the true cash-generating ability of the business. Investors should focus on FFO and dividend coverage ratios instead of P/E when assessing CHT's value.