Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 22.1x · EV/EBITDA 10.6x · ROE 8.0%. (2012–2026 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.5B | $1.7B | $2.2B | $2.2B | $2.1B | $3.3B | $4.0B | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $9.7B | $698.3B | $694.0B | $630.8B | $500.5B | $422.6B | $335.0B | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 22.12 | 0.15 | 0.54 | 0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 1.72 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.08 | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 1.71 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.06 | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.53 | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 10.33 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.13 | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 5.02 | 7.15 | 7.76 | 6.40 | 7.12 | 6.95 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.58 | 7.90 | 9.56 | 9.93 | 8.58 | 8.81 | 7.99 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 15.52 | 8.80 | 11.49 | 12.33 | 12.05 | 17.45 | 10.95 | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44.08 | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 58.5% | 91.1% | 95.3% | 91.1% | 99.5% | 99.1% | 98.9% | 99.8% | 97.9% | 100.0% |
| Operating Margin | 43.4% | 43.4% | 53.5% | 56.5% | 54.2% | 57.6% | 62.1% | 66.9% | 72.7% | 57.7% | 58.9% |
| Net Profit Margin | 7.9% | 7.9% | 3.9% | 4.2% | -6.2% | -27.1% | -16.2% | -5.6% | 6.1% | 1.2% | 2.6% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 8.0% | 8.0% | 3.0% | 2.8% | -3.9% | -16.8% | -10.9% | -3.5% | 3.5% | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| ROA | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.4% | 0.4% | -0.7% | -2.8% | -1.6% | -0.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| ROIC | 5.4% | 5.4% | 4.9% | 5.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | 5.5% | 6.2% | 7.2% | 4.7% | 4.8% |
| ROCE | 8.2% | 8.2% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 8.5% | 9.9% | 6.3% | 6.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 5.40 | 5.40 | 5.59 | 5.39 | 4.53 | 3.54 | 5.43 | 4.53 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 2.12 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 8.65 | 8.65 | 10.09 | 10.32 | 9.20 | 9.34 | 8.38 | 8.18 | 7.10 | 11.19 | 10.49 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 4.92 | 5.28 | 5.17 | 4.21 | 3.32 | 5.11 | 4.36 | 3.67 | 3.01 | 1.65 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 7.88 | 7.88 | 9.53 | 9.90 | 8.55 | 8.74 | 7.89 | 7.88 | 6.85 | 10.54 | 8.13 |
| Debt / FCF | — | — | — | — | — | — | 43.55 | — | — | — | — |
| Interest Coverage | 1.22 | 1.22 | 100.96 | 1.19 | 76.00 | 45.77 | 64.43 | 0.98 | 1.19 | — | — |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.95 | 1.34 | 1.52 | 1.61 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 0.72 | 0.94 | 1.33 | 1.50 | 1.60 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 1.02 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.56 | 0.70 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.78 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
| Inventory Turnover | 4.35 | 4.35 | 2.06 | 2.28 | 5.83 | 0.40 | 0.51 | 0.87 | 0.11 | 3.41 | 0.29 |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | — | — | — | — | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2026 | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 4.5% | 649.6% | 185.4% | 165.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | — | — | — | — | — | — | 189.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 40.1% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $369M | $366M | $366M | $377M | $399M | $401M | $401M | $401M | $346M | $300M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 14 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying RNW stock.
ReNew Energy Global Plc's current P/E ratio is 22.1x. The historical average is 0.4x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
ReNew Energy Global Plc's current EV/EBITDA is 10.6x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 8.8x.
ReNew Energy Global Plc's return on equity (ROE) is 8.0%. The historical average is -0.9%.
Based on historical data, ReNew Energy Global Plc is trading at a P/E of 22.1x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
ReNew Energy Global Plc has 58.5% gross margin and 43.4% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
ReNew Energy Global Plc's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 8.6x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
High leverage and thin net margins
Premium Priced for Growth, Not Yield
RNW trades at 21.84x trailing earnings with no dividend, per reported data, a premium to renewable peers like CWEN (23.70x) and BEP (negative), reflecting growth expectations rather than income appeal.
The absence of a dividend yield, unlike CWEN's 8.9% and BEP's 12.1%, positions RNW as a pure growth vehicle in a sector where yield is typically a primary return driver. The P/E of 21.84x, while slightly below CWEN's 23.70x, is supported by a forward P/E of 0.50x, implying the market expects substantial earnings expansion. This valuation appears to price in continued capacity additions and margin improvement, but it leaves little room for execution missteps or rising financing costs.
Earned ROE Lags Authorized Levels
RNW's trailing ROE of 8.0% per reported figures falls short of typical renewable authorized returns, with quarterly ROE swinging from -3.0% to 4.0%, indicating regulatory lag and project ramp-up volatility.
The gap between earned ROE and the regulatory allowed return appears significant, as quarterly ROE averaged only 1.6% over the last ten quarters, per financial statements. This suggests that new capacity is not yet earning its authorized return, likely due to construction-in-progress not generating revenue and interest costs capitalizing during development. Investors should monitor whether ROE converges toward authorized levels as projects stabilize, which would validate the current valuation premium.
Margin Expansion Signals Effective Recovery
Operating margin surged to 46.2% in 2027Q1 from 29.6% in 2026Q4, per reported financials, indicating strong cost recovery and operational leverage, though net margin remains thin at 13.4% due to financing costs.
The sharp improvement in operating margin suggests that PPA pricing and cost recovery mechanisms are functioning effectively, with revenue growth of 43.3% YoY outpacing cost increases. However, the gap between operating margin (46.2%) and net margin (13.4%) highlights the heavy interest burden, with interest coverage at only 1.33x. This implies that while operational cost recovery is strong, financial costs are eroding a significant portion of earnings, a trend that could worsen if rates rise.
Debt-Funded Growth Strains Balance Sheet
Debt-to-capital remains elevated at 0.84, with debt-to-equity at 5.40x per reported figures, far above typical utility levels, while interest coverage of 1.33x in 2027Q1 indicates limited cushion for rate increases.
The capital structure is heavily debt-dependent, with equity growth of 24.7% since 2024Q4 largely from issuance rather than retained earnings, as ROE averaged only 1.6%. FFO-to-debt of 1.80% in 2027Q1 is exceptionally low, suggesting weak credit metrics that could constrain future borrowing capacity. This leverage appears to be a deliberate strategy to fund rapid capacity expansion, but it exposes the company to refinancing risk and interest rate sensitivity, which could compress net margins further.
No Payout, Full Reinvestment Mode
RNW pays no dividend, per reported data, with a payout ratio of zero, allowing full internal reinvestment into its CAPEX program, which averaged $25.3B per quarter over the last four quarters.
The absence of a dividend is consistent with a high-growth renewable developer prioritizing rate base expansion over shareholder distributions. This approach preserves cash for internal funding, but the FCF deficit of approximately $103B cumulative over ten quarters indicates that even full reinvestment is insufficient, necessitating external capital. Investors should view the lack of yield as a trade-off for growth, but the reliance on equity and debt issuance to fund the deficit raises questions about long-term shareholder value creation.
Growth Premium Over Yield Peers
RNW's P/E of 21.84x and EV/EBITDA of 10.55x, per reported data, sit below CWEN's 15.36x EV/EBITDA but above BEP's negative earnings, reflecting a growth-oriented profile versus income-focused peers.
Compared to CWEN and BEP, RNW offers no dividend yield, which is a significant differentiator in a sector where yield is a primary return component. However, its ROE of 8.0% exceeds both peers (CWEN 1.6%, BEP 0.4%), suggesting better earnings power despite higher leverage. The valuation premium appears justified by superior growth metrics, but it hinges on continued execution; any slowdown in capacity additions or margin compression could trigger a de-rating toward peer levels.
Misapplied P/E Ignores Growth Phase
Comparing RNW's P/E to mature utilities is misleading, as per reported data, because its earnings are depressed by heavy interest costs and project ramp-up, obscuring underlying operational strength.
The standard P/E ratio fails to capture RNW's value because net margin of 7.9% is artificially suppressed by financing costs, while operating margin of 46.2% reflects strong operational performance. A more appropriate metric is EV/EBITDA, which at 10.55x is lower than CWEN's 15.36x, indicating relative undervaluation on an enterprise basis. Additionally, investors should adjust for construction-in-progress that is not yet earning returns, as this inflates the asset base and depresses ROE, making P/B of 1.69x appear higher than the underlying earnings power justifies.