Latest Ratios: P/E Ratio 630.6x · EV/EBITDA 50.5x · ROE 3.5%. (2016–2025 historical series)
Price-based multiples — how expensive the stock is relative to earnings, sales, book value, and cash flow
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.2B | $1.1B | $992M | $950M | $736M | $662M | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enterprise Value | $1.4B | $1.4B | $1.2B | $1.3B | $997M | $815M | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/E Ratio → | 630.61 | 620.41 | — | 79.56 | 42.41 | 57.16 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/S Ratio | 24.62 | 24.23 | 17.25 | 31.71 | 24.05 | 33.10 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B Ratio | 6.63 | 6.52 | 5.46 | 4.13 | 3.38 | 3.68 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/FCF | 463.50 | 456.18 | 77.41 | 43.48 | 63.67 | 24.54 | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/OCF | 435.29 | 428.42 | 76.95 | 43.48 | 56.01 | 23.81 | — | — | — | — | — |
P/E links to full P/E history page with 30-year chart
Enterprise-value multiples — capital-structure-neutral measures of total business value
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | — | 29.91 | 21.60 | 42.83 | 32.56 | 40.72 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 50.53 | 49.88 | — | 83.87 | 44.69 | 55.34 | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBIT | 51.49 | 44.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / FCF | — | 562.95 | 96.93 | 58.73 | 86.21 | 30.19 | — | — | — | — | — |
Margins and return-on-capital ratios measuring operating efficiency
Full margin charts and quarterly trend are on the Earnings History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 97.8% | 97.8% | 61.1% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 99.8% | 89.5% | 97.5% |
| Operating Margin | 58.8% | 58.8% | -20.4% | 50.2% | 72.5% | 73.2% | 77.1% | 74.9% | 78.1% | 76.8% | 86.2% |
| Net Profit Margin | 13.4% | 13.4% | -68.8% | 53.0% | 68.3% | 66.6% | 68.9% | 60.9% | 77.4% | 76.8% | 86.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE | 3.5% | 3.5% | -19.2% | 7.1% | 10.5% | 10.2% | 11.0% | 9.2% | 14.5% | 11.7% | 10.7% |
| ROA | 1.3% | 1.3% | -7.1% | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.1% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.0% |
| ROIC | 4.8% | 4.8% | -1.8% | 2.2% | 4.1% | 4.1% | 4.7% | 5.7% | 8.2% | 7.4% | — |
| ROCE | 6.2% | 6.2% | -2.4% | 2.9% | 5.1% | 5.3% | 6.0% | 6.8% | 11.0% | 11.2% | 10.2% |
Solvency and debt-coverage ratios — lower is generally safer
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / Equity | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.31 | 1.08 | 1.71 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.19 | 0.30 |
| Debt / EBITDA | 9.85 | 9.85 | — | 22.60 | 12.74 | 13.21 | 13.70 | 7.33 | 3.49 | 2.07 | 2.72 |
| Net Debt / Equity | — | 1.53 | 1.38 | 1.45 | 1.20 | 0.85 | 1.48 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 0.17 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 9.46 | 9.46 | — | 21.78 | 11.68 | 10.36 | 11.79 | 4.88 | 3.48 | 1.88 | 2.21 |
| Debt / FCF | — | 106.77 | 19.52 | 15.25 | 22.54 | 5.65 | 12.59 | 4.76 | 4.98 | 1.95 | 2.08 |
| Interest Coverage | 1.25 | 1.25 | -0.42 | 0.52 | 1.03 | 1.40 | 1.81 | 2.60 | -0.02 | -0.04 | 6.21 |
Short-term solvency ratios and asset-utilisation metrics
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 1.79 | 5.76 | 486.66 | 76.84 | 6.39 | 4.29 |
| Quick Ratio | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.33 | 1.14 | 1.79 | 5.76 | 486.66 | 76.84 | 6.39 | 4.29 |
| Cash Ratio | 0.62 | 0.62 | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 1.67 | 0.62 | 74.39 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Asset Turnover | — | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Inventory Turnover | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Days Sales Outstanding | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Earnings, FCF, buyback, and dividend yields — total returns to shareholders
Full dividend history and growth charts are on the Dividend History page
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.7% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Payout Ratio | 150.6% | 150.6% | — | 137.9% | 90.0% | 92.1% | 88.5% | 156.3% | 87.3% | 119.3% | 127.2% |
| Metric | TTM | FY 2025 | FY 2024 | FY 2023 | FY 2022 | FY 2021 | FY 2020 | FY 2019 | FY 2018 | FY 2017 | FY 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | — | 1.3% | 2.4% | 1.7% | — | — | — | — | — |
| FCF Yield | 0.2% | 0.2% | 1.3% | 2.3% | 1.6% | 4.1% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback Yield | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total Shareholder Yield | 0.8% | 0.8% | 1.8% | 2.3% | 2.6% | 1.9% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Shares Outstanding | — | $47M | $47M | $44M | $38M | $26M | $22M | $19M | $15M | $12M | $11M |
Includes 30+ ratios · 10 years · Updated daily
Live VCP patterns, Cup & Handle overlays, support/resistance, and AI trade plans.
High-probability breakout stocks crossing their pivot across 5 pattern engines.
DCF models, multiple analysis, and analyst estimates.
10-year return with dividends reinvested.
Compare growth, multiples, and margins vs sector.
Quick answers to the most common questions about buying SCCD stock.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026's current P/E ratio is 630.6x. The historical average is 59.7x. This places it at the 100th percentile of its historical range.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026's current EV/EBITDA is 50.5x. This enterprise value multiple compares the company's total value (equity + debt - cash) to its EBITDA. The historical average is 58.4x.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026's return on equity (ROE) is 3.5%. The historical average is 6.9%.
Based on historical data, Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026 is trading at a P/E of 630.6x. This is at the 100th percentile of its historical P/E range. Compare with industry peers and growth rates for a complete picture.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026's current dividend yield is 0.82% with a payout ratio of 150.6%.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026 has 97.8% gross margin and 58.8% operating margin. Operating margin above 20% indicates strong pricing power and cost efficiency.
Sachem Capital Corp. 6.00% Notes Due 2026's Debt/EBITDA ratio is 9.8x, indicating high leverage. A ratio above 4x may signal elevated financial risk.
Key Metrics
Top Statement Risk
Persistent negative FFO and operational losses
Metrics are mathematically derived from official filings.
P/FFO Distorted by Negative Core Earnings
The P/FFO multiple for SCCD is reported at a range of 3.36x to 3.51x in 2026, a metric that is fundamentally misleading given the company's negative FFO per share of -$0.13 in each of the last two quarters, rendering standard valuation multiples inapplicable.
A P/FFO multiple in the 3x range typically signals deep value, but here it reflects a mathematical anomaly: the stock is trading at a positive price while core earnings are negative. The implied cap rate is unavailable without positive NOI, and the P/E ratio of 634.69 is equally distorted by minimal earnings. This valuation framework breaks down entirely when a REIT cannot generate consistent positive FFO, and investors should look to book value (P/B of 6.67) or asset coverage, though the declining equity base makes even that metric less reliable.
Volatile Margins Mask Operational Instability
Sachem's NOI margin shows extreme volatility, swinging from 98.4% in 2026Q1 to unavailable in 2026Q2, following a recovery from 22.9% in early 2025, a pattern that suggests the company's cost structure and revenue composition are highly unstable and dependent on unpredictable realizations from its mortgage portfolio.
The 98.4% NOI margin in 2026Q1 is superficially attractive but is reported on revenue that collapsed to zero the very next quarter. This volatility indicates that profitability is not driven by stable, recurring property income but likely by episodic gains or a narrow slice of performing assets. The negative FFO growth trend of -3.9% in 2026Q2, after a brief recovery, confirms that any margin improvement is not translating into sustainable core earnings growth.
Dividend Unsustainable Without External Funding
The FFO payout ratio is not computable for recent quarters due to negative FFO, and the 0.8% dividend yield appears to be funded by capital preservation or asset sales rather than core operations, as highlighted by the negative AFFO of -$0.13 per share reported in 2026Q1.
With AFFO negative, the dividend is not covered by cash flow from operations, forcing the company to rely on its balance sheet or market access to sustain payments. The historical FFO payout ratio of 116.6% in 2025Q2 already indicated over-distribution, and the current state of negative cash generation makes this a critical vulnerability. Investors should monitor whether the company reduces or suspends the dividend, as maintaining it under these conditions accelerates equity erosion.
Debt Retired but Equity Eroding
While the debt-to-gross-assets ratio has improved dramatically as total debt was fully retired by 2026Q2, the D/E ratio remains elevated at 1.80 in 2026Q1, reflecting an equity base that is shrinking due to cumulative losses rather than from a strengthening capital position.
The retirement of debt removes interest rate risk and refinancing concerns, but it appears to have been accomplished through asset liquidation given negative FFO. The interest coverage ratio is negative or near zero, which is now moot with no debt, but the underlying issue is the balance sheet's contraction. The shrinking equity means the company has a diminished buffer to absorb further losses from its mortgage or real estate portfolio, increasing the risk to noteholders and equity investors.
P/E Ratio: A Misleading Indicator of Value
The P/E ratio of 634.69 is the most commonly misapplied metric to this REIT, as it is inflated to an extreme level by minimal GAAP earnings, completely obscuring the negative operational reality of consistent FFO losses and a deteriorating asset base.
For REITs like Sachem, standard P/E is misleading because it is based on net income, which is heavily distorted by non-cash depreciation and potential gains/losses on investments. It suggests an astronomically expensive stock, whereas the company is actually trading at a fraction of its historical book value and generating no core profit. The correct adjustment is to use P/FFO or P/AFFO, but even these are currently invalid due to negative values. The only remaining sensible metric is price-to-book, but the declining equity trend makes that a deteriorating benchmark as well.