Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ACET vs CELC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ACET vs CELC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $75M | $4.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-109M | $-193M |
| Total Debt | $15M | $195M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $39M | $166M |
ACET vs CELC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) | 100 | 53.5 | -46.5% |
| Celcuity Inc. (CELC) | 100 | 1277.8 | +1177.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACET vs CELC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- EPS growth 20.3%
- 7.2% revenue growth vs CELC's -51.7%
- 3.0% margin vs CELC's -1.0%
CELC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.56
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs ACET's -92.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.56, current ratio 10.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CELC's -51.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs CELC's -1.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.56 vs ACET's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.3% vs CELC's +6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -50.2% ROA vs ACET's -65.4%, ROIC -80.4% vs -64.9% |
ACET vs CELC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACET vs CELC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACET leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACET and CELC operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$108M | -$186M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$109M | -$193M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$92M | -$173M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.1% | -12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ACET and CELC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $75M | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | -23.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 46.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACET leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACET delivers a -80.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-80 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CELC. ACET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CELC's 1.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CELC scores 3/9 vs ACET's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.4% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -65.4% | -50.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -64.9% | -80.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.7% | -54.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 1.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $39M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $195M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1866.49x | -5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CELC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CELC five years ago would be worth $33,516 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,839 for ACET. Over the past 12 months, ACET leads with a +932.2% total return vs CELC's +605.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CELC at 99.6% vs ACET's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | -11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +932.2% | +605.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +694.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.6% | +235.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.8% | +519.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +99.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACET and CELC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CELC is the less volatile stock with a 1.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACET's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACET currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs CELC's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.47 | $151.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $11.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.0% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.7 | 32.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACET as "Buy" and CELC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 123.6% upside for ACET (target: $18) vs 73.0% for CELC (target: $153).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $153.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACET leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CELC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ACET vs CELC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACET or CELC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Adicet Bio, Inc.
(ACET) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACET or CELC?
Over the past 5 years, Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) delivered a total return of +235. 2%, compared to -31. 6% for Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CELC returned +519. 7% versus ACET's -92. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACET or CELC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 56β versus Adicet Bio, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning ACET is approximately 34% more volatile than CELC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 194% for Celcuity Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ACET or CELC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Adicet Bio, Inc.
grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -33. 6% for Celcuity Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACET or CELC?
Adicet Bio, Inc.
(ACET) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Celcuity Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACET leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for CELC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACET leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ACET or CELC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ACET or CELC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Celcuity Inc.
(CELC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+519. 7% 10Y return). Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CELC: +519. 7%, ACET: -92. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ACET and CELC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.