ALNT vs CW

For growth investors, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the stronger pick with 12.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Allient Inc. (ALNT). Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) offers the better valuation at 58. 9x trailing P/E (49. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Allient Inc. (ALNT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the cheapest at 58.

9x versus Allient Inc. at 69. 2x. On forward P/E, Allient Inc. is actually cheaper at 36. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Curtiss-Wright Corporation wins at 2. 28x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x.

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +500.

9%, compared to +150. 2% for Allient Inc. (ALNT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CW returned +803. 7% versus ALNT's +314. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

38β versus Allient Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning ALNT is approximately 52% more volatile than CW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 65% for Allient Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is pulling ahead at 12.

1% versus 4. 6% for Allient Inc. (ALNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allient Inc. grew EPS 67. 1% year-over-year, compared to 22. 0% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CW leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

8% net margin versus 4. 0% for Allient Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CW leads at 18. 2% versus 8. 7% for ALNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CW leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 28x versus Allient Inc. 's 5. 32x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Allient Inc. (ALNT) trades at 36. 2x forward P/E versus 49. 8x for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CW: -2. 2% to $741. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Allient Inc. (ALNT) offers the highest yield at 0. 1%, versus 0. 1% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+803.

7% 10Y return). Allient Inc. (ALNT) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CW: +803. 7%, ALNT: +314. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ALNT (Technology) and CW (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.