Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CTEV vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Equipment & Services
CTEV vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $502M | $7.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $979M | $2.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-287M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 61.1% | 67.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.5x |
| Total Debt | $4.63B | $1.26B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $229M |
CTEV vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claritev Corporation (CTEV) | 100 | 140.2 | +40.2% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 78.7 | -21.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTEV vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTEV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.26
- Lower volatility, beta 2.26, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 2.26, current ratio 0.86x
HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 261.9% 10Y total return vs CTEV's 0.8%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs CTEV's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs CTEV's 3.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.6% margin vs CTEV's -29.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.26 vs HIMS's 2.53 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -27.1% vs HIMS's -41.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs CTEV's -5.8%, ROIC 8.6% vs 0.7% |
CTEV vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTEV vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CTEV and HIMS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 2.4x CTEV's $979M. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTEV's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $979M | $2.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $490M | $99M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$287M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | $76M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | +67.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -29.3% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +3.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CTEV leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CTEV's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 55.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $502M | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.1B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.70x | 69.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.37x | 55.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 3.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 16.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 105.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTEV scores 5/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.7% | +8.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.6B | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.6B | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.18x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $31,955 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,075 for CTEV. Over the past 12 months, CTEV leads with a -27.1% total return vs HIMS's -41.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 62.0% vs CTEV's 0.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.1% | -41.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | +324.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | +219.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | +261.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.3% | +62.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTEV and HIMS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTEV is the less volatile stock with a 2.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIMS currently trades 50.4% from its 52-week high vs CTEV's 39.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 2.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.07 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.50 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +50.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTEV as "Buy" and HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.4% upside for CTEV (target: $39) vs -20.8% for HIMS (target: $28).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.25 | $28.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
HIMS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CTEV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CTEV vs HIMS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTEV or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Claritev Corporation (CTEV). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) offers the better valuation at 69. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Claritev Corporation (CTEV) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CTEV or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +219. 5%, compared to +0. 8% for Claritev Corporation (CTEV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIMS returned +261. 9% versus CTEV's +0. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CTEV or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Claritev Corporation (CTEV) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
26β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 53β — meaning HIMS is approximately 12% more volatile than CTEV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — CTEV or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 3. 7% for Claritev Corporation (CTEV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Claritev Corporation grew EPS 83. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTEV or HIMS?
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -29. 4% for Claritev Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTEV leads at 4. 7% versus 4. 5% for HIMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIMS leads at 73. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTEV or HIMS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTEV or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+261. 9% 10Y return). Claritev Corporation (CTEV) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIMS: +261. 9%, CTEV: +0. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTEV and HIMS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTEV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.