Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
CWBC vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CWBC vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $494M | $2.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $194M | $1.39B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $38M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | 52.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $143M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $657M |
CWBC vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community West Banc… (CWBC) | 100 | 305.8 | +205.8% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 138.1 | +38.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWBC vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWBC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 344.4%
- 304.9% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 91.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 34.8%, current ratio 1.63x
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.15x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CWBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | PEG 2.76 vs 3.69 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CWBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs CWBC's 0.78 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs CWBC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.9% vs WAFD's +32.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CWBC's 0.5% |
CWBC vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CWBC vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWBC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 7.2x CWBC's $194M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 19.7% (CWBC) to 17.5% (WAFD).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $194M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $38M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $215M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.5% | +52.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +17.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.1% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CWBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, CWBC trades at a 9% valuation discount to WAFD's 14.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CWBC offers better value at 2.99x vs WAFD's 4.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $494M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $517M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.88x | 14.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.89x | 11.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.99x | 4.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.85x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.54x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.32x | 13.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWBC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CWBC delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. CWBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWBC scores 8/9 vs WAFD's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $24M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $143M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.06x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWBC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWBC five years ago would be worth $21,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,953 for WAFD. Over the past 12 months, CWBC leads with a +40.9% total return vs WAFD's +32.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWBC at 32.5% vs WAFD's 11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +17.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.9% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.6% | +37.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.4% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +304.9% | +91.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.5% | +11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CWBC's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.80 | $37.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.98 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.1 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 254K | 525K |
Analyst Outlook
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CWBC as "Buy" and WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.5% upside for CWBC (target: $30) vs -5.6% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, WAFD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.84% vs CWBC's 1.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.75 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.6% |
CWBC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAFD leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
CWBC vs WAFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWBC or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Community West Bancshares (CWBC) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Community West Bancshares (CWBC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWBC or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the cheapest at 12.
9x versus WaFd, Inc. at 14. 1x. On forward P/E, WaFd, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Community West Bancshares wins at 2. 76x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWBC or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) delivered a total return of +117.
4%, compared to +29. 5% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWBC returned +304. 9% versus WAFD's +91. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWBC or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Community West Bancshares's 0. 78β — meaning CWBC is approximately 18% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWBC or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Community West Bancshares grew EPS 344. 4% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWBC or WAFD?
Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
6% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWBC leads at 27. 0% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWBC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWBC or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 76x versus WaFd, Inc. 's 3. 69x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Community West Bancshares — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CWBC: 15. 5% to $29. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWBC or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 9% for Community West Bancshares (CWBC).
09Is CWBC or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Community West Bancshares (CWBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
78), 1. 9% yield, +304. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWBC: +304. 9%, WAFD: +91. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWBC and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CWBC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.