Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
NTCT logo
NTCT
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs NTCT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.90B
5Y Perf.+98.1%

FATN vs NTCT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
NTCT logoNTCT
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - Infrastructure
Market Cap$85M$2.90B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$859M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$96M
Gross Margin87.2%78.1%
Operating Margin18.7%12.8%
Forward P/E20.8x16.8x
Total Debt$6M$40M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$586M

FATN vs NTCTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
NTCT
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT)100198.1+98.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs NTCT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FATN and NTCT are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. NetScout Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Growth Play

FATN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 133.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
  • 17.9% revenue growth vs NTCT's 4.5%
  • 25.9% margin vs NTCT's 11.1%
Best for: growth exposure
NTCT
NetScout Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.07
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.85x
  • Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.85x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFATN logoFATN17.9% revenue growth vs NTCT's 4.5%
ValueNTCT logoNTCTLower P/E (16.8x vs 20.8x)
Quality / MarginsFATN logoFATN25.9% margin vs NTCT's 11.1%
Stability / SafetyNTCT logoNTCTBeta 1.07 vs FATN's 2.17, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NTCT logoNTCT+74.8% vs FATN's -33.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FATN logoFATN15.2% ROA vs NTCT's 4.2%, ROIC 11.9% vs 7.3%

FATN vs NTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc.
FY 2026
Service
56.9%$489M
Product
43.1%$370M

FATN vs NTCT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFATNLAGGINGNTCT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

NTCT is the larger business by revenue, generating $859M annually — 44.7x FATN's $19M. FATN is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTCT's 11.1%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$859M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$169M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$96M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$285M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+78.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%+12.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+11.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%+33.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%-1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%
FATN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 17.3x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 45% valuation discount to NTCT's 31.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NTCT's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FATN's 21.6x.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
Market CapShares × price$85M$2.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$85M$2.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.31x31.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x16.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.59x14.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.42x3.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.37x1.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.17x
NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FATN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FATN delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $6 for NTCT. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATN's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 7/9 vs FATN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+6.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%+4.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%+7.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+6.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351-$547M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$586M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$40M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x67.81x
FATN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FATN and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Over the past 12 months, NTCT leads with a +74.8% total return vs FATN's -33.0%.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+181.9%+51.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-33.0%+74.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+34.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+34.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+62.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.3%
Evenly matched — FATN and NTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NTCT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NTCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$43.80
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$20.39
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.6%+92.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.765.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M549K
NTCT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates FATN as "Buy" and NTCT as "Hold".

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NTCT logoNTCTNetScout Systems,…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts121
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.6%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

FATN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTCT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs NTCT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or NTCT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or NTCT?

On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus NetScout Systems, Inc. at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, NetScout Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is safer — FATN or NTCT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NetScout Systems, Inc.

(NTCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately 102% more volatile than NTCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 23% for FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FATN or NTCT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus 4. 5% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to 125. 7% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FATN leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FATN or NTCT?

FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 9% net margin versus 11. 1% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FATN leads at 18. 7% versus 13. 0% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FATN or NTCT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NetScout Systems, Inc.

(NTCT) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or NTCT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is FATN or NTCT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NetScout Systems, Inc.

(NTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07)). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FATN and NTCT?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.