Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Figma, Inc. (FIG) vs Shopify Inc. (SHOP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FIG | 41.0% revenue growth vs SHOP's 30.1% |
| Value | SHOP | Lower P/E (65.9x vs 118.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | SHOP | 10.7% net margin vs FIG's -124.5% |
| Stability / Safety | FIG | Beta 1.91 vs SHOP's 2.23 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHOP | +7.8% vs FIG's -74.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SHOP | 8.1% ROA vs FIG's -56.0%, ROIC 9.4% vs -95.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Figma is a cloud-based collaborative design platform that enables teams to create, prototype, and develop digital products together in real time. It generates revenue primarily through subscription plans — with tiered pricing for individuals, teams, and enterprises — and makes money from seat-based licensing of its design, whiteboarding, and developer tools. Its key competitive advantage is its browser-first collaborative architecture, which creates network effects as design teams and their developer counterparts adopt the platform together.
Shopify is a comprehensive commerce platform that enables businesses of all sizes to create online stores, manage sales across multiple channels, and handle operations like payments, shipping, and inventory. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees for its platform tiers — which account for about 30% of revenue — and merchant solutions like payment processing, shipping, and capital advances that make up the remaining 70%. The company's key advantage is its integrated ecosystem that combines easy-to-use store creation tools with a vast app marketplace and fulfillment network, creating high switching costs for merchants as they grow their businesses.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
SHOP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FIG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
SHOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 10.9x FIG's $1.1B. SHOP is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIG's -124.5%.
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $243M | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.4% | +48.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -122.2% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -124.5% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.0% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $157.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $156.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.92x | 128.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 118.03x | 65.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 104.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 13.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.56x | 11.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.66x | 78.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHOP delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-87 for FIG. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIG's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHOP scores 6/9 vs FIG's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.0% | +9.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.0% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -95.3% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.8% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$345M | -$1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $403M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SHOP five years ago would be worth $9,216 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,545 for FIG. Over the past 12 months, SHOP leads with a +7.8% total return vs FIG's -74.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHOP at 43.2% vs FIG's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.9% | -23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -74.6% | +7.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +193.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | -7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +5294.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
FIG is the less volatile stock with a 1.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHOP currently trades 66.3% from its 52-week high vs FIG's 20.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.91x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $142.92 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.85 | $69.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.6% | +66.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 48.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.6M | 10.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIG as "Hold" and SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.8% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 23.1% for FIG (target: $36).
| Metric | FIGFigma, Inc. | SHOPShopify Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.17 | $165.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | $505M | $1.1B | +109.1% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | $389M | $11.6B | +2868.2% |
Shopify Inc.'s revenue grew from $389M (2016) to $11.6B (2025) — a 45.8% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | 56.6% | -118.4% | -309.2% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | -9.1% | 10.7% | +217.3% |
Shopify Inc.'s net margin went from -9% (2016) to 11% (2025).
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 4 Years
| Stock | 2020 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 435.4 | 171.2 | -60.7% |
Shopify Inc. has traded in a 61x–435x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~128x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Figma, Inc. (FIG) | 0.59 | -3.71 | -732.7% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | -0.04 | 0.94 | +2332.8% |
Shopify Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.04 (2016) to $0.94 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Figma, Inc. generated $246M FCF in 2025 (-76% vs 2023). Shopify Inc. generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+314% vs 2021).
FIG vs SHOP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIG or SHOP a better buy right now?
Shopify Inc. (SHOP) offers the better valuation at 128.4x trailing P/E (65.9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shopify Inc. (SHOP) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIG or SHOP?
On forward P/E, Shopify Inc. is actually cheaper at 65.9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIG or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) delivered a total return of -7.8%, compared to -74.6% for Figma, Inc. (FIG). A $10,000 investment in SHOP five years ago would be worth approximately $9K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +52.9% versus FIG's -74.6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIG or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Figma, Inc. (FIG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.91β versus Shopify Inc.'s 2.23β — meaning SHOP is approximately 16% more volatile than FIG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Figma, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — FIG or SHOP?
Shopify Inc. (SHOP) is the more profitable company, earning 10.7% net margin versus -118.4% for Figma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10.7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12.7% versus -122.2% for FIG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIG leads at 82.4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FIG or SHOP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) trades at 65.9x forward P/E versus 118.0x for Figma, Inc. — 52.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 36.8% to $165.16.
07Which pays a better dividend — FIG or SHOP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FIG or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Figma, Inc. (FIG) carries a higher beta of 1.91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHOP: +52.9%, FIG: -74.6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FIG and SHOP?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.