Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
GRAF vs AMG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GRAF vs AMG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $312M | $9.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $717M |
| Gross Margin | — | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 38.8x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $699.00 | $586M |
GRAF vs AMG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graf Global Corp. (GRAF) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Affiliated Managers… (AMG) | 100 | 475.6 | +375.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GRAF vs AMG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, GRAF is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
AMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.8%, EPS growth 50.3%
- 128.3% 10Y total return vs GRAF's 14.1%
- PEG 0.26 vs GRAF's 2.34
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 38.8x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs GRAF's 4.0% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.7% vs GRAF's +3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs GRAF's 3.3%, ROIC 8.1% vs -0.6% |
GRAF vs AMG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMG and GRAF operate at a comparable scale, with $2.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $855M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $717M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$393,929 | $978M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +62.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +42.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.1% | +149.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, AMG trades at a 60% valuation discount to GRAF's 38.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMG offers better value at 0.40x vs GRAF's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $312M | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $312M | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.79x | 15.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.34x | 0.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMG delivers a 16.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for GRAF. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMG scores 8/9 vs GRAF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.5% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$699 | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $699 | $586M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMG leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, AMG leads with a +92.7% total return vs GRAF's +3.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.9% | +92.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +143.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +120.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.1% | +128.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +34.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GRAF and AMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GRAF is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMG's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMG currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs GRAF's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.85 | $355.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.26 | $179.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.6% | +99.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.7 | 73.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 315K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $402.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% |
AMG leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
GRAF vs AMG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GRAF or AMG a better buy right now?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. (AMG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GRAF or AMG?
On trailing P/E, Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Graf Global Corp. at 38. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GRAF or AMG?
Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMG returned +128.
3% versus GRAF's +14. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GRAF or AMG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning AMG is approximately -3883% more volatile than GRAF relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — GRAF or AMG?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
grew EPS 50. 3% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Graf Global Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GRAF or AMG?
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
(AMG) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Graf Global Corp. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMG leads at 31. 8% versus 0. 0% for GRAF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMG leads at 86. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — GRAF or AMG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is GRAF or AMG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graf Global Corp.
(GRAF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GRAF: +14. 1%, AMG: +128. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between GRAF and AMG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GRAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.