Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PASG vs RCKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
PASG vs RCKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $18M | $366M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-209M |
| Total Debt | $24M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $46M | $78M |
PASG vs RCKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 16.0 | -84.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PASG vs RCKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PASG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 33.1%
- 39.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 19.7%
- 3.7% margin vs RCKT's 2.6%
RCKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.94
- -89.0% 10Y total return vs PASG's -98.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.94, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 6.38x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.6% revenue growth vs RCKT's 19.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs RCKT's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.94 vs PASG's 3.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.4% vs PASG's -28.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -59.6% ROA vs PASG's -59.8%, ROIC -62.4% vs -141.9% |
PASG vs RCKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PASG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PASG and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$206M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$31M | -$180M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.4% | +25.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PASG and RCKT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $366M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | $313M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.39x | -1.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCKT delivers a -70.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-71 in annual profit, vs $-151 for PASG. RCKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PASG's 1.28x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -150.9% | -70.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -59.8% | -59.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.9% | -62.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.6% | -58.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $46M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $25M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -43.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCKT five years ago would be worth $779 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $195 for PASG. Over the past 12 months, RCKT leads with a +18.4% total return vs PASG's -28.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PASG at -32.9% vs RCKT's -47.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.2% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.4% | +18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.8% | -85.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -92.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -89.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.9% | -47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
RCKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PASG's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCKT currently trades 61.5% from its 52-week high vs PASG's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 1.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $5.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.94 | $2.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 55.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 86K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RCKT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PASG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
PASG vs RCKT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PASG or RCKT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PASG or RCKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) delivered a total return of -92. 2%, compared to -98. 1% for Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCKT returned -89. 0% versus PASG's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PASG or RCKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus Passage Bio, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning PASG is approximately 70% more volatile than RCKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 128% for Passage Bio, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PASG or RCKT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Passage Bio, Inc.
grew EPS 33. 1% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PASG or RCKT?
Passage Bio, Inc.
(PASG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PASG leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PASG leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PASG or RCKT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is PASG or RCKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(RCKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Passage Bio, Inc. (PASG) carries a higher beta of 3. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCKT: -89. 0%, PASG: -98. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PASG and RCKT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.