Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ROLR vs FLUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
ROLR vs FLUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $57M | $19.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $17.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-457M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -34.5% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $807K | $13.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $3.83B |
ROLR vs FLUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Roller Technol… (ROLR) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 52.1 | -47.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ROLR vs FLUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ROLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 19.5x)
- 5.9% margin vs FLUT's -2.7%
- +137.8% vs FLUT's -59.2%
FLUT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.94
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.95x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs ROLR's -26.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs FLUT's -2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs ROLR's 2.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +137.8% vs FLUT's -59.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC -119.9% vs 4.5% |
ROLR vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR vs FLUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ROLR and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 998.5x ROLR's $17M. ROLR is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLUT's -2.7%. On growth, FLUT holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $17.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$457M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.5% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -2.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.2% | +4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.3% | +17.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.6% | -22.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FLUT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $57M | $19.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.64x | -63.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.36x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 17.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ROLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ROLR delivers a 7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. ROLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLUT's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUT scores 4/9 vs ROLR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.9% | -4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -119.9% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -63.7% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $9.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $3.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $807,000 | $13.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -17.49x | 0.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ROLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, ROLR leads with a +137.8% total return vs FLUT's -59.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +190.0% | -49.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.8% | -59.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -42.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -42.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -8.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FLUT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUT is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ROLR's 2.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLUT currently trades 35.3% from its 52-week high vs ROLR's 18.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.73x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.68 | $313.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.16 | $91.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +18.9% | +35.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 63.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $192.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.8% |
FLUT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). ROLR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
ROLR vs FLUT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ROLR or FLUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — ROLR or FLUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus High Roller Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 73β — meaning ROLR is approximately 189% more volatile than FLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 138% for Flutter Entertainment plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — ROLR or FLUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -26. 6% for High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: High Roller Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 143. 9% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — ROLR or FLUT?
High Roller Technologies, Inc.
(ROLR) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 4% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUT leads at 6. 3% versus -27. 8% for ROLR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ROLR leads at 53. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — ROLR or FLUT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is ROLR or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94)). High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR) carries a higher beta of 2. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between ROLR and FLUT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ROLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.