Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
TACH logo
TACH
BN logo
BN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TACH vs BN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$287M
5Y Perf.-0.5%
BN
Brookfield Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$101.14B
5Y Perf.+9.7%

TACH vs BN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TACH logoTACH
BN logoBN
IndustryShell CompaniesAsset Management
Market Cap$287M$101.14B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$76.58B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$1.33B
Gross Margin35.3%
Operating Margin28.3%
Forward P/E16.4x
Total Debt$74.00$312.61B
Cash & Equiv.$25.00$16.24B

TACH vs BNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TACH
BN
StockJun 25Jun 26Return
Titan Acquisition C… (TACH)10099.5-0.5%
Brookfield Corporat… (BN)100109.7+9.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TACH vs BN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TACH and BN are tied at the top with 1 category each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Brookfield Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TACH
Titan Acquisition Corp.
The Banking Pick

TACH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in efficiency.

  • 3.8% ROA vs BN's 0.3%
Best for: efficiency
BN
Brookfield Corporation
The Banking Pick

BN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 290.7% 10Y total return vs TACH's 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.58, current ratio 1.14x
  • Beta 1.58, current ratio 1.14x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BN logoBN+15.1% vs TACH's +3.0%
Efficiency (ROA)TACH logoTACH3.8% ROA vs BN's 0.3%

TACH vs BN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTACHLAGGINGBN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

BN and TACH operate at a comparable scale, with $76.6B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$76.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$99,706$30.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$1.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$536,520-$7.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+35.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-9.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+199.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Valuation Metrics

TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Market CapShares × price$287M$101.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$287M$397.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-246.45x90.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.37x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
TACH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Profitability & Efficiency

TACH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

TACH delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $1 for BN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BN scores 5/9 vs TACH's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.4%+0.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.8%+0.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.88x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$49$296.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$25$16.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$74$312.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.34x
TACH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $17,216 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,297 for TACH. Over the past 12 months, BN leads with a +15.1% total return vs TACH's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 29.0% vs TACH's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+1.7%-2.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.0%+15.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+114.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+72.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.0%+290.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.0%+29.0%
BN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TACH is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BN's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TACH currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs BN's 91.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.02x1.58x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.00$49.57
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.04$37.93
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+94.5%+91.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.149.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded32K4.7M
TACH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricTACH logoTACHTitan Acquisition…BN logoBNBrookfield Corpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$56.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts9
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TACH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BN leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallTitan Acquisition Corp. (TACH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TACH vs BN: Frequently Asked Questions

7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TACH or BN a better buy right now?

Brookfield Corporation (BN) offers the better valuation at 90.

4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Brookfield Corporation (BN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — TACH or BN?

Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +72.

2%, compared to +3. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. (TACH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BN returned +290. 7% versus TACH's +3. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — TACH or BN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Titan Acquisition Corp.

(TACH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Brookfield Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning BN is approximately -6954% more volatile than TACH relative to the S&P 500.

04

Which has better profit margins — TACH or BN?

Brookfield Corporation (BN) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

7% net margin versus 0. 0% for Titan Acquisition Corp. — meaning it keeps 1. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 28. 6% versus 0. 0% for TACH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BN leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

05

Which pays a better dividend — TACH or BN?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

06

Is TACH or BN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Titan Acquisition Corp.

(TACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Brookfield Corporation (BN) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TACH: +3. 0%, BN: +290. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

07

What are the main differences between TACH and BN?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.