TRNS vs TISI

For growth investors, Transcat, Inc.

(TRNS) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) offers the better valuation at 160. 1x trailing P/E (51. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Transcat, Inc.

(TRNS) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -79. 7% for Team, Inc. (TISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRNS returned +769. 1% versus TISI's -94. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Team, Inc.

(TISI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Transcat, Inc. 's 1. 35β — meaning TRNS is approximately 277% more volatile than TISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 13% for Team, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Transcat, Inc.

(TRNS) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus 5. 2% for Team, Inc. (TISI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Team, Inc. grew EPS -35. 4% year-over-year, compared to -63. 7% for Transcat, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRNS leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Transcat, Inc.

(TRNS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -5. 5% for Team, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRNS leads at 4. 0% versus 1. 7% for TISI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRNS leads at 32. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Team, Inc.

(TISI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TISI: -94. 0%, TRNS: +769. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TRNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TISI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.