VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+172.0%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisVET
MEG
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
VET vs MEG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MEG
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$566M
5Y Perf.-3.2%
VET vs MEG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  VET |  MEG |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $1.71B | $566M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.81B | $821M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-814M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 35.9% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 122.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.30B | $359M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $11M |
VET vs MEG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
VET
MEG
| Stock | Jul 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vermilion Energy In… (VET) | 100 | 272.0 | +172.0% |
| Montrose Environmen… (MEG) | 100 | 96.8 | -3.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VET vs MEG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: VET leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇VET emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
The Income Pick
VET carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta -0.18, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.18, Low D/E 58.6%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta -0.18, yield 4.1%, current ratio 0.84x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MEG
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
MEG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.3%, EPS growth 93.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.1%
- -30.1% 10Y total return vs VET's -39.7%
- 19.3% revenue growth vs VET's -15.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  MEG | 19.3% revenue growth vs VET's -15.0% |
| Value |  VET | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 122.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | MEG | 0.7% margin vs VET's -44.9% |
| Stability / Safety | VET | Lower D/E ratio (58.6% vs 79.6%) |
| Dividends | VET | 4.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MEG's 0.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | VET | +45.6% vs MEG's -33.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MEG | 0.6% ROA vs VET's -13.8%, ROIC 1.3% vs 3.5% |
VET vs MEG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
VET vs MEG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLVETLAGGINGMEG
MEGMontrose Environmenta…
2leads
VETVermilion Energy Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MEGMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MEG4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MEG6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
VET5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
VET2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
VET2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VET is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 2.2x MEG's $821M. MEG is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VET's -44.9%. On growth, MEG holds the edge at -5.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $821M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$814M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $301M | $72M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.9% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.9% | +0.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +8.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.4% | -5.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.9% | +45.3% |
MEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VET and MEG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, VET's 3.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MEG's 14.4x.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $566M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $913M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.68x | -111.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.20x | 122.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.92x | 14.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.35x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.32x | 6.21x |
Evenly matched — VET and MEG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MEG delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-34 for VET. VET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MEG's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MEG scores 4/9 vs VET's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.8% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.5% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $348M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $11M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $359M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.53x | 4.67x |
MEG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VET five years ago would be worth $14,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,136 for MEG. Over the past 12 months, VET leads with a +45.6% total return vs MEG's -33.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VET at 1.3% vs MEG's -28.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.7% | -37.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | -33.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.0% | -63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.4% | -68.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | -30.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | -28.2% |
VET leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VET is the less volatile stock with a -0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MEG's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VET currently trades 75.2% from its 52-week high vs MEG's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.18x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.82 | $32.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.00 | $14.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.9 | 25.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 444K |
VET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
VET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VET as "Hold" and MEG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 215.4% upside for MEG (target: $49) vs -3.7% for VET (target: $11). For income investors, VET offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs MEG's 0.76%.
| Metric | VETVermilion Energy … | MEGMontrose Environm… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.74 | $49.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +21.6% |
VET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
VET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). MEG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallVermilion Energy Inc. (VET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
VET vs MEG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VET or MEG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is the stronger pick with 19. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). Analysts rate Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VET or MEG?
Over the past 5 years, Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) delivered a total return of +41. 4%, compared to -68. 6% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MEG returned -30. 1% versus VET's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VET or MEG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 18β versus Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning MEG is approximately -1007% more volatile than VET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 80% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VET or MEG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is pulling ahead at 19. 3% versus -15. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. grew EPS 93. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1313. 3% for Vermilion Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MEG leads at 15. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VET or MEG?
Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.
(MEG) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 1% net margin versus -37. 0% for Vermilion Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VET leads at 9. 5% versus 1. 5% for MEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MEG leads at 34. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VET or MEG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 122. 1x for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. — 110. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MEG: 215. 4% to $49. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — VET or MEG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Vermilion Energy Inc. (VET) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG).
08Is VET or MEG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vermilion Energy Inc.
(VET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 18), 4. 1% yield). Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VET: -39. 7%, MEG: -30. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VET and MEG?
These companies operate in different sectors (VET (Energy) and MEG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: VET is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MEG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.