Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AARD vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
AARD vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $79M | $6.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $-506M |
| Total Debt | $441K | $72K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $902M |
AARD vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aardvark Therapeuti… (AARD) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 161.7 | +61.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AARD vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AARD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 4.4% margin vs IMVT's 2.6%
- -56.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%
IMVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.67
- EPS growth -1.5%
- 230.5% 10Y total return vs AARD's -74.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -22.2% revenue growth vs AARD's -150.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.4% margin vs IMVT's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.67 vs AARD's 2.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.6% vs AARD's -67.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -56.3% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2% |
AARD vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AARD and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$75M | -$532M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | -$506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | -$407M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -130.2% | -14.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AARD and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.38x | -11.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.74x | 7.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AARD delivers a -61.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-62 in annual profit, vs $-68 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AARD's 0.00x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -61.7% | -68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.3% | -62.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -70.0% | -68.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$47M | -$902M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $441,000 | $72,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,544 for AARD. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +103.6% total return vs AARD's -67.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.9% vs AARD's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -72.4% | +26.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.8% | +103.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +51.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +207.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.6% | +230.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | +14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
IMVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AARD's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs AARD's 20.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.94 | $36.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.35 | $14.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.3% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 32.8 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 155K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AARD as "Buy" and IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 705.8% upside for AARD (target: $29) vs 32.8% for IMVT (target: $44).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.33 | $43.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMVT leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
AARD vs IMVT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AARD or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (AARD) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AARD or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -74. 6% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +230. 5% versus AARD's -74. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AARD or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 67β versus Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 69β — meaning AARD is approximately 60% more volatile than IMVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 0% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AARD or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immunovant, Inc.
grew EPS -1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -177. 9% for Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AARD or IMVT?
Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (AARD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AARD leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AARD leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AARD or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AARD or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+230. 5% 10Y return). Aardvark Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (AARD) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMVT: +230. 5%, AARD: -74. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AARD and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.