Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
ABVX logo
ABVX
RCKT logo
RCKT
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
REGN logo
REGN
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ABVX
Abivax S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$6.33B
5Y Perf.+949.5%
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$300M
5Y Perf.-84.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+130.6%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+46.3%
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.60B
5Y Perf.-21.5%

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ABVX logoABVX
RCKT logoRCKT
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
REGN logoREGN
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBiotechnology
Market Cap$6.33B$300M$896.00B$355.61B$63.60B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$280.33B$49.28B$14.92B
Net Income (TTM)$-427M$-209M$57.05B$13.70B$4.42B
Gross Margin60.0%61.7%84.5%
Operating Margin25.9%29.3%24.3%
Forward P/E14.4x25.3x13.2x
Total Debt$32M$25M$942.38B$45.49B$2.71B
Cash & Equiv.$516M$78M$343.34B$10.27B$3.12B

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ABVX
RCKT
JPM
KO
REGN
StockOct 23Jun 26Return
Abivax S.A. (ABVX)1001049.5+949.5%
Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT)10015.2-84.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100230.6+130.6%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100146.3+46.3%
Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN)10078.5-21.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO and REGN are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. ABVX, RCKT, and JPM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ABVX
Abivax S.A.
The Long-Run Compounder

ABVX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 10.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
  • +12.8% vs RCKT's -10.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
RCKT
Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Leader

RCKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 19.7% revenue growth vs ABVX's -100.0%
Best for: growth
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
  • Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Best for: valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
  • Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs ABVX's -143.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
REGN
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
  • Beta 0.51, yield 0.6%, current ratio 4.13x
  • 29.6% margin vs ABVX's -3.9%
  • Beta 0.51 vs RCKT's 2.06, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRCKT logoRCKT19.7% revenue growth vs ABVX's -100.0%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsREGN logoREGN29.6% margin vs ABVX's -3.9%
Stability / SafetyREGN logoREGNBeta 0.51 vs RCKT's 2.06, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ABVX logoABVX+12.8% vs RCKT's -10.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs ABVX's -143.2%

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Biotech & Healthcare Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
ABVXAbivax S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCKTRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Collaboration Revenue
51.1%$7.3B
Product
44.0%$6.3B
Product and Service, Other
4.9%$703M

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGRCKT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and RCKT operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JPM's 20.4%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$280.3B$49.3B$14.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$327M-$206M$81.4B$15.5B$4.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$427M-$209M$57.0B$13.7B$4.4B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$250M-$180M$100.9B$12.6B$4.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+60.0%+61.7%+84.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.9%+29.3%+24.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.4%+27.8%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+36.0%+25.5%+27.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.1%+19.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-40.0%+25.0%+16.0%+18.2%-7.2%
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.8x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Market CapShares × price$6.3B$300M$896.0B$355.6B$63.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.8B$248M$1.50T$390.8B$63.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-17.96x-1.37x16.00x27.18x14.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.40x25.27x13.18x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x2.43x2.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.36x26.39x15.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.20x7.42x4.43x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.76x1.10x2.47x10.40x2.13x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.88x67.15x15.59x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for ABVX. ABVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.0%-70.8%+15.9%+41.1%+14.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-143.2%-59.6%+1.3%+13.1%+11.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-62.4%+4.5%+15.8%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-77.7%-58.1%+8.9%+17.3%+10.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–931575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.07x0.09x2.60x1.33x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$484M-$53M$599.0B$35.2B-$412M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$516M$78M$343.3B$10.3B$3.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$32M$25M$942.4B$45.5B$2.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.16x-43.58x0.74x10.70x108.44x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ABVX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ABVX five years ago would be worth $116,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, ABVX leads with a +1275.4% total return vs RCKT's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABVX at 126.6% vs RCKT's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-27.8%-20.5%-0.5%+20.3%-20.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+1275.4%-10.4%+21.8%+17.2%+18.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1063.3%-88.0%+138.2%+47.0%-18.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1063.3%-94.2%+118.2%+65.6%+16.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1063.3%-91.1%+465.8%+121.1%+68.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+126.6%-50.7%+33.6%+13.7%-6.4%
ABVX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCKT's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 50.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.05x2.06x0.94x-0.20x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$148.83$5.45$337.25$84.04$821.11
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.69$2.40$262.71$65.35$503.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+64.9%+50.5%+95.1%+98.3%+74.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.731.159.160.637.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M2.3M7.0M12.7M868K
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ABVX as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for RCKT (target: $5) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs REGN's 0.56%.

MetricABVX logoABVXAbivax S.A.RCKT logoRCKTRocket Pharmaceut…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…REGN logoREGNRegeneron Pharmac…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$131.22$5.00$339.75$86.13$836.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1219614848
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+2.5%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises15561
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.95$2.04$3.41
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.9%+0.2%+6.2%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). REGN leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ABVX vs RCKT vs JPM vs KO vs REGN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 8x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Abivax S. A. (ABVX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 8x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

Over the past 5 years, Abivax S.

A. (ABVX) delivered a total return of +1063%, compared to -94. 2% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABVX returned +1063% versus RCKT's -91. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning RCKT is approximately -1130% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abivax S. A. (ABVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus 1. 0% for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 26. 4% year-over-year, compared to -66. 1% for Abivax S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for RCKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RCKT: 81. 8% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), REGN (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ABVX, RCKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ABVX or RCKT or JPM or KO or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, RCKT: -91. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ABVX and RCKT and JPM and KO and REGN?

These companies operate in different sectors (ABVX (Healthcare) and RCKT (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and REGN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ABVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JPM, KO, REGN pay a dividend while ABVX, RCKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.